If that comment was really made by someone who spoke with a juror, yet more grounds for appeal (or in a just society, the conviction getting thrown out and everything being declared a mistrial). Jurors are specifically told not to discuss the case with anyone, and to not read or research anything related to the case. If a juror was discussing things outside the court, everything is null and void.
Don't forget the part where you kick them in the nuts until they sign confessions. I expect that part will be even more fun than watching them dance the hemp fandango at the end.
Imagine being such a libtarded little bitch that you shit all over the justice system to put the orange man in jail … and then handing him the means to reverse your efforts at the last minute.
Goes along with the NPC mindset. So many people are utterly incapable of anything beyond first order thinking (only thinking of the immediate consequences of their actions, not anything down the road). They were just focused on "Get Orange Man!" and the only immediate consequences are "Orange Man in jail, yay!" and "My cousin will love me for convicting Orange Man!". I doubt anyone on the jury thought beyond that at all.
I think part of it is that the whole judicial system in New York is so pozzed that they have no reason to believe that running their traps will get this tossed. I can't say I disagree with that assessment.
This thing feels weird. I suspect Merchan is playing up a shitposter from the Court Facebook page so he (but really other people) can say: 'we looked into it and there was no jury bullshit.' Then, when in a few months, a jury member blabs that they all knew they were going to convict from day one, the courts and the press can all say that the Judge already put this issue to rest.
I think they just want it in the news. More days talking about "felon" Trump.
They've got July 11th? when they sentence Trump to 136 years of jail, stayed immediately by appeals and then nothing until the election. The other cases aren't going to give them any good headlines before Nov.
Is anyone really shocked? We know knew the jury was taking orders, so of course they were talking to other people. The judge is just covering his own ass so this doesn't get thrown out on appeal.
Probably just a giggly little shithead communist trying to stir things up, but much like the guys who claim to be postal workers who throw out Republican mail ballots, you can infer 100% of their actual beliefs and they should be in jail because of that.
If that comment was really made by someone who spoke with a juror, yet more grounds for appeal (or in a just society, the conviction getting thrown out and everything being declared a mistrial). Jurors are specifically told not to discuss the case with anyone, and to not read or research anything related to the case. If a juror was discussing things outside the court, everything is null and void.
I don't want an appeal, I want the people making a mockery of the judicial system set on fire and I want it live-streamed.
"If you shout 'this is MAGA country' loud enough we'll douse the flames. Honest."
I'd like to see a Nuremberg type trial, with Merchan and Bragg going first.
Don't forget the part where you kick them in the nuts until they sign confessions. I expect that part will be even more fun than watching them dance the hemp fandango at the end.
You. I like you.
Imagine being such a libtarded little bitch that you shit all over the justice system to put the orange man in jail … and then handing him the means to reverse your efforts at the last minute.
Goes along with the NPC mindset. So many people are utterly incapable of anything beyond first order thinking (only thinking of the immediate consequences of their actions, not anything down the road). They were just focused on "Get Orange Man!" and the only immediate consequences are "Orange Man in jail, yay!" and "My cousin will love me for convicting Orange Man!". I doubt anyone on the jury thought beyond that at all.
I think part of it is that the whole judicial system in New York is so pozzed that they have no reason to believe that running their traps will get this tossed. I can't say I disagree with that assessment.
This thing feels weird. I suspect Merchan is playing up a shitposter from the Court Facebook page so he (but really other people) can say: 'we looked into it and there was no jury bullshit.' Then, when in a few months, a jury member blabs that they all knew they were going to convict from day one, the courts and the press can all say that the Judge already put this issue to rest.
I think they just want it in the news. More days talking about "felon" Trump.
They've got July 11th? when they sentence Trump to 136 years of jail, stayed immediately by appeals and then nothing until the election. The other cases aren't going to give them any good headlines before Nov.
What did that jury do for two days, because they sure as shit weren't debating the verdict?
Orgy?
yeah keep proving the entire trial was fake and gay from the start
Is anyone really shocked? We know knew the jury was taking orders, so of course they were talking to other people. The judge is just covering his own ass so this doesn't get thrown out on appeal.
Probably just a giggly little shithead communist trying to stir things up, but much like the guys who claim to be postal workers who throw out Republican mail ballots, you can infer 100% of their actual beliefs and they should be in jail because of that.