Many Japanese "queer" characters were always depicted as overly horny and disgusting, to the point that it's a running joke. The ones in One Piece being the best example.
The other type is cute boys that look like girls which are "otokonoko" which is what Vivian was referred to in the original JP version.
But it really didn't help when Yamato went into the men's bath at the end of that arc, literally saying that it was fine for her to be on that side because she was a man herself.
You're falling for their Begging The Question Fallacy: You're allowing their assumption that they even create these things to begin with. In reality, they're taking existing IPs, existing words, existing stories, and perverting them into something that supports their ideology. They aren't "writing a believable queer character" not because the "believable" part is false, but because the "writing" part is false. The core premise isn't valid, let alone secondary details to spawn from it.
To everyone else, I'd invite you to review our Community Rules and please remember that Nintendo Life is a welcoming, friendly community for ANYONE who loves video games and wants to share that passion.
"Unless you disagree with the establishment narrative, in which case you are unwelcome."
The character in question is Tony, Jeff’s best friend, and while Tony’s sexuality is never explicitly stated, the subtext is clear. He clings to Jeff, offers to clean his glasses, and frequently checks in on Jeff’s quest to save the world while worrying that he’s overbearing.
Wouldn't that make him Jeff's gay lover and thus make Jeff gay? Why are we saying the best friend is gay only?
"Ya'll can't behave" will be the "arbeit macht frei" of their re-education camps
Which is something that never do. Vivian is way too attractive in universe and girl looking to believably represent a tranny.
Their gay characters are never degenerate and horny enough to represent an actual homo.
This is just them writing propaganda pieces misrepresenting what they are to make people think they aren't a problem.
Many Japanese "queer" characters were always depicted as overly horny and disgusting, to the point that it's a running joke. The ones in One Piece being the best example.
The other type is cute boys that look like girls which are "otokonoko" which is what Vivian was referred to in the original JP version.
I'm surprised One Piece hasn't been banned yet
The most popular manga and anime in the world. One Piece is bigger than them.
they sure tried to push the "yamato is trans" thing HARD.
That they did.
But it really didn't help when Yamato went into the men's bath at the end of that arc, literally saying that it was fine for her to be on that side because she was a man herself.
You're falling for their Begging The Question Fallacy: You're allowing their assumption that they even create these things to begin with. In reality, they're taking existing IPs, existing words, existing stories, and perverting them into something that supports their ideology. They aren't "writing a believable queer character" not because the "believable" part is false, but because the "writing" part is false. The core premise isn't valid, let alone secondary details to spawn from it.
Well obviously. We are here where the core part goes without saying because we all know this is both a localizer issue and people out to subvert shit.
I was just pointing out that even in their cover story, its still laughably retarded.
"Unless you disagree with the establishment narrative, in which case you are unwelcome."
Wouldn't that make him Jeff's gay lover and thus make Jeff gay? Why are we saying the best friend is gay only?
Considering how they see Sam and Frodo, Cap and Bucky, etc, this doesn't surprise me one bit. Male platonic relationships are verboten.
¿Por Qué No Los Dos?
nobody wants your tranny nonsese, that's why you have to lie and sneak.
Go away, fag.