There's video evidence of it is out literally MINUTES after it happened, before the story spin. I mean it's hilarious they are more worried about spinning the story to not show how diversity training almost killed one of their officers but it more pathetic than funny.
Have a contact who actually LIVES in Mannheim, had to check but fortunately they're fine, was home all day (being a gamer saves lives). They were telling me how they don't visit that part of the city because 'weirdos' frequent that area a lot but there are 'worse' areas..
There's video evidence of it is out literally MINUTES after it happened, before the story spin.
This is what happens all the time. Same with Kyle Rittenhouse. I had seen most of the videos by the next day. There's was never any legitimate case against him. Yet the media ignore the evidence and tell the story they want to tell.
That's how story spins work. Most people aren't constantly plugged in and able to see a bunch of videos of any happening immediately within the same day.
So by the time it even reaches their attention, its already been spun and the evidence buried so they never know how wrong it is.
Just imagine how bad it was before the internet. There is a gun youtuber Paul Harrell (who is dying of cancer) who says how he never trusted media because his dad was a Portland cop, and every week while watching the local news, his dad would say "that's not what happened, I was there."
There's video evidence of it is out literally MINUTES after it happened, before the story spin. I mean it's hilarious they are more worried about spinning the story to not show how diversity training almost killed one of their officers but it more pathetic than funny.
Have a contact who actually LIVES in Mannheim, had to check but fortunately they're fine, was home all day (being a gamer saves lives). They were telling me how they don't visit that part of the city because 'weirdos' frequent that area a lot but there are 'worse' areas..
This is what happens all the time. Same with Kyle Rittenhouse. I had seen most of the videos by the next day. There's was never any legitimate case against him. Yet the media ignore the evidence and tell the story they want to tell.
That's how story spins work. Most people aren't constantly plugged in and able to see a bunch of videos of any happening immediately within the same day.
So by the time it even reaches their attention, its already been spun and the evidence buried so they never know how wrong it is.
It's called manufacturing consent, and it's why democracy is a joke.
the fucking new york times did a play-by-play and couldn't spin it against him, but everyone else thought they could do it.
Just imagine how bad it was before the internet. There is a gun youtuber Paul Harrell (who is dying of cancer) who says how he never trusted media because his dad was a Portland cop, and every week while watching the local news, his dad would say "that's not what happened, I was there."
Who do you trust, uranilists or your own lying eyes?
Can you rephrase that sentence? Which part in particular was out within minutes?
The video of him stabbing people then the cop after the event. The attempt to spin it happened at least 2 hours AFTER this was all over social media.
I see, thanks.