There's video evidence of it is out literally MINUTES after it happened, before the story spin.
This is what happens all the time. Same with Kyle Rittenhouse. I had seen most of the videos by the next day. There's was never any legitimate case against him. Yet the media ignore the evidence and tell the story they want to tell.
That's how story spins work. Most people aren't constantly plugged in and able to see a bunch of videos of any happening immediately within the same day.
So by the time it even reaches their attention, its already been spun and the evidence buried so they never know how wrong it is.
Just imagine how bad it was before the internet. There is a gun youtuber Paul Harrell (who is dying of cancer) who says how he never trusted media because his dad was a Portland cop, and every week while watching the local news, his dad would say "that's not what happened, I was there."
This is what happens all the time. Same with Kyle Rittenhouse. I had seen most of the videos by the next day. There's was never any legitimate case against him. Yet the media ignore the evidence and tell the story they want to tell.
That's how story spins work. Most people aren't constantly plugged in and able to see a bunch of videos of any happening immediately within the same day.
So by the time it even reaches their attention, its already been spun and the evidence buried so they never know how wrong it is.
It's called manufacturing consent, and it's why democracy is a joke.
the fucking new york times did a play-by-play and couldn't spin it against him, but everyone else thought they could do it.
Just imagine how bad it was before the internet. There is a gun youtuber Paul Harrell (who is dying of cancer) who says how he never trusted media because his dad was a Portland cop, and every week while watching the local news, his dad would say "that's not what happened, I was there."