fuck off with that ACAB shit. every jurisdiction is unique, some have dirty cops, some have corrupt cops, and some are actually enforcing the fucking law.
Even good cops claim to only protect and serve, not enforce the law. Bad cops use enforcing the law as an excuse to arbitrarily go after certain people for whatever reason. (personal corruption, state corruption, or laziness)
"To Protect and to Serve" was the winner of a fucking magazine contest the LAPD ran in February 1955 to determine what future motto to spray on their patrol cars. It has zero legal or even moral basis, as numerous US Supreme Court cases, such as Castle Rock v. Gonzalez, have shown.
It's an ideal that police want to feel like they're upholding, and expect us to believe. I'd argue they do have a moral obligation. The Uvalde police should've been lynched, regardless of legality.
Its that tomorrow, every single one of them could change to be evil and you couldn't do a damn thing about it. They'd be able to do so without issue, and probably even be promoted for it.
Its never that they all are, its that they all have the power to at any moment. And all that keeps them from doing so is their own individual morality.
Let's test this theory with a little thought experiment. If you shoot your local pedo Gary Plauche style, will you be arrested? If you try to disport a busload of illegals at gunpoint will you be arrested?
yes, and rightfully so. if you have a pedo in your neighborhood, report them to the fucking police. if there are illegal immigrants causing issues, report them to the police.
I know in my neighborhood, Justice would be served in both instances.
Imagine hating the police for doing their job. If you dont like the law, get it changed. Dont blame the police for just doing their job. Its like Pallys and BLM moved into this site.
fuck off with that ACAB shit. every jurisdiction is unique, some have dirty cops, some have corrupt cops, and some are actually enforcing the fucking law.
None of them enforce the law. They enforce the wishes of the establishment, law be damned.
Even good cops claim to only protect and serve, not enforce the law. Bad cops use enforcing the law as an excuse to arbitrarily go after certain people for whatever reason. (personal corruption, state corruption, or laziness)
"To Protect and to Serve" was the winner of a fucking magazine contest the LAPD ran in February 1955 to determine what future motto to spray on their patrol cars. It has zero legal or even moral basis, as numerous US Supreme Court cases, such as Castle Rock v. Gonzalez, have shown.
It's an ideal that police want to feel like they're upholding, and expect us to believe. I'd argue they do have a moral obligation. The Uvalde police should've been lynched, regardless of legality.
The problem isn't that all of them are evil.
Its that tomorrow, every single one of them could change to be evil and you couldn't do a damn thing about it. They'd be able to do so without issue, and probably even be promoted for it.
Its never that they all are, its that they all have the power to at any moment. And all that keeps them from doing so is their own individual morality.
All of them are zog bots
Not around Atlanta, they're not.
Let's test this theory with a little thought experiment. If you shoot your local pedo Gary Plauche style, will you be arrested? If you try to disport a busload of illegals at gunpoint will you be arrested?
yes, and rightfully so. if you have a pedo in your neighborhood, report them to the fucking police. if there are illegal immigrants causing issues, report them to the police.
I know in my neighborhood, Justice would be served in both instances.
Imagine hating the police for doing their job. If you dont like the law, get it changed. Dont blame the police for just doing their job. Its like Pallys and BLM moved into this site.
This you? Pick a lane faggot. Or do jews just shape-shift without conscious thought?