Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

38
The FTC has voted/issued a new rule banning non-compete agreements from being included in contracts effectively immediately (and not retroactively). (www.ftc.gov)
posted 2 years ago by redman012 2 years ago by redman012 +38 / -0
FTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompetes
Today, the Federal Trade Commission issued a final rule to promote competition by banning noncompetes nationwide, protecting the fundamen
www.ftc.gov
30 comments share
30 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
▲ 12 ▼
– realerfunction 12 points 2 years ago +12 / -0

offer your best employees better and they'll stay.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

this. and if you were a startup without the funds to up the ante, you can provide things like stock options to your employees. any startup worth their salts is planning on growing, so stock options in a startup have a lot of potential value. if the startup isn't planning on growing, then the employee should be abandoning ship anyway.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Ahaus667 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

That’s not how employee poaching works. You would have to double your R&D costs because any larger competitor will just keep upping the offer to clone the IP at a reduced price.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– dagthegnome 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

No start-up has the resources to offer employees the same deals they can get if a big corp wants to entice them. Especially if that same big corp is using their market clout to crush the start-up's profits.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

As someone who's done both, there is no amount of money I can be paid to put up with megacorp red tape, bullshit, and having X - Sqrt(X) of my "fellow" employees being fucking leeches on productivity.

Communists talk about the owners of production being leeches, but the kind of lazy DEI dindu slobs that manage to hold on to their jobs for decades without ever doing anything worth any value to anyone are the true leeches.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Then give them stock options that get paid out if the company ever goes public. If the company doesn't make it, you owe them nothing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dagthegnome 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

If you're an up-and-coming software engineer/ product designer / marketer etc living in a dense blue urban shithole like NY or SF with sky-high rents, are you going to go for the stock option, or are you going to take the job that's offering you a 6-figure salary right now?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I'm going to go for a job that isn't in NYC or SF. There is no salary high enough to convince me to live there.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– Ahaus667 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Sure, and if the business fails, the employees are liable correct? No? Oh wait, you’re a leftist who wants to socialize losses and privatize gains.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Oh fuck off. I'm probably one of the furthest to the right there is on this sub.

It's risk vs reward. If the company goes public/gets bought out by a bigger company, they will earn way more money than what they would have with that higher salary. Besides, those higher salaries don't exist when all of the companies collude with each other to keep salaries low and enforce non compete clauses like Google and Apple were busted for doing a few years ago.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy