10,000 papers retracted, anyone have a source?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (18)
sorted by:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8
The name is right there at the top, as is the title of the article. I'm very surprised that you can't find it. It was the first Google result for 'nature papers retracted'
https://archive.ph/dSF1X
Archive. I don't know what I did wrong.
In before a certain guy yells at you for putting a screenshot as the post anyway.
the post was very clearly looking for source, totally different
I thought the title was joking about how "sources" will now be harder to find or believe, because so many are being retracted.
That was an unintended but welcome joke.
Reading is hard.
>INTEGRITY EXPERTS
TEGRITY
Unfortunately I can see the usual suspects using this as an opportunity to force retraction of research that's inconvenient to the agenda on the most tenuous of grounds.
I guess that's the source.
So the usual suspects are doubling down on cheating and plagiarizing.
Unironically Pakistani anti-gay research is pretty thorough and always based. They’ve had research related to fags and increased incidence of violence, groupthink, and response to propaganda. All of which are well documented and very intriguing
I have been hearing this all around, but haven't found a source yet.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03974-8
Thank you.
a lot are probably bullshit social-science papers.