As per previous article, there are emails between Hillary and her father wanting to bleed more money out of Crowder per month and how to do so by affecting his reputation. Specifically they wanted to assemble a team that knows how right wingers think and operate so they could best impact his image.
Secondly, the ring video that people keep bringing up? Turns out, Hillary deleted all other footage so no one else could retrieve them. Also didn't turn over all of them despite a court order.
Also, Hillary tried to remove Crowders dog, by claiming the dog was dangerous to the children and so Crowder couldn't have the children over while the dog was around.
These thing are always messy but this sounds like it's well over the top against Crowder.
I get that he can be a dick at work, he's the boss and keeps the pennies rolling in, but his personal life shouldn't be getting drawn into it.
The fact that his ex-wife is in a group with her father collecting actions to be taken again Steven and not responding to elements that should be responded to and communicating with this Jared person outside of where she should leaves a lot of room for abuse against Steven here.
The missing footage and attempts to remove Joe Louis from his life seem petty and vindictive.
Don't get me wrong if a shit-show from Hell bomb drops and Steven is Satan's spawn I'll be all for him going down big time, but anything short of that seems like a conspiracy and the whole “I just don’t want [Steven Crowder] anywhere near those kids,” part from Jared is bordering on calling him a child abuser (Pick whichever poison you want for that one).
It sounds like a typical case of not very nice people surrounding themselves with much worse people who'll take any opportunity to stab each other in the back.
Steven already seemed like a massive dick, but it seems that the ex and her family are also conniving bitches. I get wanting to do the best for your daughter, but there's just something slimy about weighing PR strategies like "stronger through a healthy and amicable divorce" vs "victim of a narcissist."
Don't get me wrong if a shit-show from Hell bomb drops and Steven is Satan's spawn I'll be all for him going down big time, but anything short of that seems like a conspiracy and the whole “I just don’t want [Steven Crowder] anywhere near those kids,” part from Jared is bordering on calling him a child abuser (Pick whichever poison you want for that one).
The weird thing is, that article from evilplushie reported that Jared and the ex had not communicated in nearly six years before he offered to help her with the divorce.
2lazy2try just clipped some footage from a Crowder undercover sting on a drag rally in which him and Not Gay Jared made out with each other... multiple times. Steven has confessed to a "bisexual phase" in the past. Couple that with the footage of spanking Bryan Callen in a BDSM "skit" and claims of teabagging (Mostly?) Not Gay Jared, it is likely there's a sexual component to this.
i mean as per geralds video, apparently it was a thing for jared to take out his dick and show it to steven ONLY in public settings for humor while crowder tries to stop from laughing
I'm shocked that people would collude together for money.
And it's a woman? My god man, that never happens at all. Except for all the times it ever has. Did you see the richest women in the world list, 99% of the list got their money from divorce?
Demand a prenup guys. It's a deal breaker from her, she's a ball breaker for you.
You can't limit divorce terms with a prenup. All prenups that try to fix divorce terms are tossed out on the grounds they are 'coercive.' The woman will always argue that she had no choice but to sign it (which is insane, but nevermind).
You can only exclude preexisting assets from the marriage and only if the funds are never touched for the entire duration of the marriage. If you have a separate bank account and one time you use it to buy a cup of coffee, it is now community property. Only assets sealed away completely in a trust or similar vehicle can be excluded. Money you make while married will always be considered 'hers'. Even if you try to say your business had nothing to do with her, they'll say her 'support' was what made you the money and give her a cut.
The purpose of prenups was originally to protect rich heiress's from having their family fortunes stolen by handsome losers. Attempts by men to use them to limit divorce settlements are viewed very harshly by the courts.
For an example, look at the Bezos divorce. Chickadee there claimed that she was so dumb that even with a lawyer's help, she was unable to know what a prenup was. She also claimed that she was the driving force behind Amazon's success.
Yep, textbook case. Eat a man's cum and she gets credit for everything he does. I've also heard of cases where men got married during college, and the courts declared that the college degree was owed to the women due to her awesome 'support' (because no man graduates without a wife??). Therefore the degree was half hers, and she was entitled to half of all his future earnings BEFORE asset division (so she gets 3/4 minimum).
So some cliff notes,
As per previous article, there are emails between Hillary and her father wanting to bleed more money out of Crowder per month and how to do so by affecting his reputation. Specifically they wanted to assemble a team that knows how right wingers think and operate so they could best impact his image.
Secondly, the ring video that people keep bringing up? Turns out, Hillary deleted all other footage so no one else could retrieve them. Also didn't turn over all of them despite a court order.
Also, Hillary tried to remove Crowders dog, by claiming the dog was dangerous to the children and so Crowder couldn't have the children over while the dog was around.
These thing are always messy but this sounds like it's well over the top against Crowder.
I get that he can be a dick at work, he's the boss and keeps the pennies rolling in, but his personal life shouldn't be getting drawn into it.
The fact that his ex-wife is in a group with her father collecting actions to be taken again Steven and not responding to elements that should be responded to and communicating with this Jared person outside of where she should leaves a lot of room for abuse against Steven here.
The missing footage and attempts to remove Joe Louis from his life seem petty and vindictive.
Don't get me wrong if a shit-show from Hell bomb drops and Steven is Satan's spawn I'll be all for him going down big time, but anything short of that seems like a conspiracy and the whole “I just don’t want [Steven Crowder] anywhere near those kids,” part from Jared is bordering on calling him a child abuser (Pick whichever poison you want for that one).
It's about the money. Note the message that says when sc agrees to their terms they can show him how to make it go away
It sounds like a typical case of not very nice people surrounding themselves with much worse people who'll take any opportunity to stab each other in the back.
Steven already seemed like a massive dick, but it seems that the ex and her family are also conniving bitches. I get wanting to do the best for your daughter, but there's just something slimy about weighing PR strategies like "stronger through a healthy and amicable divorce" vs "victim of a narcissist."
The weird thing is, that article from evilplushie reported that Jared and the ex had not communicated in nearly six years before he offered to help her with the divorce.
2lazy2try just clipped some footage from a Crowder undercover sting on a drag rally in which him and Not Gay Jared made out with each other... multiple times. Steven has confessed to a "bisexual phase" in the past. Couple that with the footage of spanking Bryan Callen in a BDSM "skit" and claims of teabagging (Mostly?) Not Gay Jared, it is likely there's a sexual component to this.
It's the keeping him away from the kids comment that gets me.
That's serious fighting talk.
i mean as per geralds video, apparently it was a thing for jared to take out his dick and show it to steven ONLY in public settings for humor while crowder tries to stop from laughing
Sounds a bit like two assholes calling one another the bigger asshole.
Rich people divorce? Ah yes, smell the manure.
WOMAN LOGIC:
Want the man to pay more.
Attack the man's source of income.
?
Magically get more money!
Imagine that, it's about the money.
I'm shocked that people would collude together for money.
And it's a woman? My god man, that never happens at all. Except for all the times it ever has. Did you see the richest women in the world list, 99% of the list got their money from divorce?
Demand a prenup guys. It's a deal breaker from her, she's a ball breaker for you.
You can't limit divorce terms with a prenup. All prenups that try to fix divorce terms are tossed out on the grounds they are 'coercive.' The woman will always argue that she had no choice but to sign it (which is insane, but nevermind).
You can only exclude preexisting assets from the marriage and only if the funds are never touched for the entire duration of the marriage. If you have a separate bank account and one time you use it to buy a cup of coffee, it is now community property. Only assets sealed away completely in a trust or similar vehicle can be excluded. Money you make while married will always be considered 'hers'. Even if you try to say your business had nothing to do with her, they'll say her 'support' was what made you the money and give her a cut.
The purpose of prenups was originally to protect rich heiress's from having their family fortunes stolen by handsome losers. Attempts by men to use them to limit divorce settlements are viewed very harshly by the courts.
For an example, look at the Bezos divorce. Chickadee there claimed that she was so dumb that even with a lawyer's help, she was unable to know what a prenup was. She also claimed that she was the driving force behind Amazon's success.
Yep, textbook case. Eat a man's cum and she gets credit for everything he does. I've also heard of cases where men got married during college, and the courts declared that the college degree was owed to the women due to her awesome 'support' (because no man graduates without a wife??). Therefore the degree was half hers, and she was entitled to half of all his future earnings BEFORE asset division (so she gets 3/4 minimum).
That's what hillary supporters are claiming too
Okay, we're all fucked.
There's a way to avoid it but it's an example of "grasping the nettle." I don't blame men for not trying.