I commented before listing to Dr. Bhattacharya's podcast segment with her.
She does or did head the Concerned Ontario Doctor splinter group (not sure what their COVID beliefs are, they are more a dissident group against universal healthcare funding shenanigans).
She did file a defamation suit but in response was hit with a 1.2 million penalty award anti-SLAPP judgment from the judge before the case was even heard.
Apparently it got appealed down to 300k but owes the sum total by the end of the month which will essentially bankrupt her and her family medicine/pediatrics practise.
It's eye-opening what anti-SLAPP type legislation has turned into. what was supposed to be a way to protect the man in the street from frivolous litigation just for speaking, is now a way to destroy anyone who objects to the monolithic narratives of global megacorps. All cheered on by supposed anti-authoritarians.
good info, thanks.
Thanks.
I commented before listing to Dr. Bhattacharya's podcast segment with her.
She does or did head the Concerned Ontario Doctor splinter group (not sure what their COVID beliefs are, they are more a dissident group against universal healthcare funding shenanigans).
She did file a defamation suit but in response was hit with a 1.2 million penalty award anti-SLAPP judgment from the judge before the case was even heard.
Apparently it got appealed down to 300k but owes the sum total by the end of the month which will essentially bankrupt her and her family medicine/pediatrics practise.
It's eye-opening what anti-SLAPP type legislation has turned into. what was supposed to be a way to protect the man in the street from frivolous litigation just for speaking, is now a way to destroy anyone who objects to the monolithic narratives of global megacorps. All cheered on by supposed anti-authoritarians.
That's why you always need to read the fine print on these things.
Governments will never help the man in the street, as a rule, because he can't afford lobbyists.