He's repeatedly stated that 'Trump cultists' are the ones who were saying that they wouldn't back DeSantis. Which is pretty accurate, and even if it were wrong, it's a perfectly legitimate POV. Just like DeSantis cultists are people who wouldn't back Trump.
The people on this thread are really, really silly. This guy backed a different candidate than we did, and now you're obsessed with telling him "I TOLD YOU SO" to boost your own ego when he is on the side of the angels now.
Nah. He's at least insinuated I was a trump cultist for pointing out people have the right to vote for Trump in a primary even if he thinks Trump will lose in an election against biden
Then he went on a rant about how much he hates Trump cultists
We're talking about evidence-based predictions here (or really patently obvious outcomes) and complete disdain for the community you're trying to sway - not who anyone does or doesn't want to vote for. I don't mind if someone supports DeSantis. He seems like a nice governor. I wouldn't assume someone who doesn't vote for Trump is a DeSantis cultist. That doesn't even make sense.
Anyone who is so into DeSantis that he's DeSantis or bust - meaning that he won't vote for Trump if he's the nominee. That's a DeSantis cultist.
I've been critical of this guy, and in fact was so when his takes were a good deal more popular than they are now. But I do understand him. While I'm not as anti-coronavaccine as the average person here, this guy suffered because of the mandates, and as a result, he thought that DeSantis was good for his foresight and Trump was less so because he continued to advocate for the vaccine. That is understandable.
Now let's suppose that you are correct and he did show 'disdain' for the community, and that it's not good to be able to stand up for yourself (even if wrongly) against a group. Water under the bridge. What is it achieving to hate on a guy who supported DeSantis, then accepted with grace that his candidate lost and is now on your side?
it's not good to be able to stand up for yourself (even if wrongly) against a group
Never said that. Anyway you're kind of generalizing here as well. Perhaps others care but I don't need or want an apology from the guy. He can do what he wants. If he's not a shill perhaps he will reconsider where he gets his news from and that those of us who disagreed might have been on to something. Nothing wrong with challengers throwing the hat in the ring, but there was never a question that Trump would be the nominee.
True, you mentioned 'disdain' for the community. That is the unfavorable interpretation of what he was doing, and what I said was a positive spin on the same thing.
If he's not a shill
If?
Nothing wrong with challengers throwing the hat in the ring, but there was never a question that Trump would be the nominee.
Hindsight is 20/20. Before the indictments, there was a window of opportunity.,
He's repeatedly stated that 'Trump cultists' are the ones who were saying that they wouldn't back DeSantis. Which is pretty accurate, and even if it were wrong, it's a perfectly legitimate POV. Just like DeSantis cultists are people who wouldn't back Trump.
The people on this thread are really, really silly. This guy backed a different candidate than we did, and now you're obsessed with telling him "I TOLD YOU SO" to boost your own ego when he is on the side of the angels now.
Nah. He's at least insinuated I was a trump cultist for pointing out people have the right to vote for Trump in a primary even if he thinks Trump will lose in an election against biden
Then he went on a rant about how much he hates Trump cultists
We're talking about evidence-based predictions here (or really patently obvious outcomes) and complete disdain for the community you're trying to sway - not who anyone does or doesn't want to vote for. I don't mind if someone supports DeSantis. He seems like a nice governor. I wouldn't assume someone who doesn't vote for Trump is a DeSantis cultist. That doesn't even make sense.
Anyone who is so into DeSantis that he's DeSantis or bust - meaning that he won't vote for Trump if he's the nominee. That's a DeSantis cultist.
I've been critical of this guy, and in fact was so when his takes were a good deal more popular than they are now. But I do understand him. While I'm not as anti-coronavaccine as the average person here, this guy suffered because of the mandates, and as a result, he thought that DeSantis was good for his foresight and Trump was less so because he continued to advocate for the vaccine. That is understandable.
Now let's suppose that you are correct and he did show 'disdain' for the community, and that it's not good to be able to stand up for yourself (even if wrongly) against a group. Water under the bridge. What is it achieving to hate on a guy who supported DeSantis, then accepted with grace that his candidate lost and is now on your side?
Never said that. Anyway you're kind of generalizing here as well. Perhaps others care but I don't need or want an apology from the guy. He can do what he wants. If he's not a shill perhaps he will reconsider where he gets his news from and that those of us who disagreed might have been on to something. Nothing wrong with challengers throwing the hat in the ring, but there was never a question that Trump would be the nominee.
True, you mentioned 'disdain' for the community. That is the unfavorable interpretation of what he was doing, and what I said was a positive spin on the same thing.
If?
Hindsight is 20/20. Before the indictments, there was a window of opportunity.,