Sounds like the lawsuit he was talking about was complete dogshit, but I'm OK with using this quote to imply that Lankford is possibly trafficking underage girls from Mexico. Traitors get the rope.
I'm of the opinion that they're taking him entirely out of context and using it to smear him because he's being a cocksucker right now. I don't see any links in the article but I'm also at work and speed browsing
I don't necessarily appreciate it because that's a Leftoid tactic, but I'm not gonna cry a river over it either.
They link the AP article that is quoted: https://archive.is/MWF1S
The AP article sourced a transcript of a deposition for a sexual assault case (15 year-old boy supposedly had sex with a 13 year-old girl). Presumably said deposition is not publicly available, so the AP is potentially our only window of context.
There's just one more quote taken from the deposition related to this line of questioning:
Under additional questioning about whether he would allow his two daughters to consent to sex at the age of 13, Lankford gave a more expansive answer.
“No, I would not encourage that at all,” he said. “Could she make that choice? I hope she would not, but I would not encourage that in any way with my own daughter.”
It’s unclear whether Lankford, who has no formal legal training, was aware of the legal age of consent at the time of his deposition. [The age of consent in Oklahoma is 16, and although there is an exception in the law for minors between the ages of 14 and 17 who have sexual contact, there is no provision under which a 13-year-old could consent to sex.]
Watching him try to spin and gaslight on his twatter account is comedy gold. And the replies are pretty epic. Now he's pivoting to "but... but... look at the dead babies!!!" (abortion) to try and change the subject.
Sad thing is that he isn't up for reelection until 2029 and people will probably forget and reelect this pedo quisling.
Lankford sounds like a shitbag but I'm not seeing a video or a direct link to his quote. It's entirely possible (and most likely) that he was saying that a 13 year old and and a 15 year old doing the do and "consenting", and not "A 13 y/o girl can fuck a 30 y/o if she wants"
Like if someone here can provide me a link before I find my own I'd be happy to be corrected/wrong whatever. If he thinks kids can fuck anyone that he deserves a rope. But let's not shit our pants over someone saying some teen kids having sex when they shouldn't be is different than kids and adults. I think 2 year age difference at that age is a big difference, but there's context and background I'm missing atp. The article does the classic "stringing together a few quotes that don't have links to back it up" that can be used to make anyone say anything.
Well that explains his open borders bill. He's a uniparty goon who wants a steady supply of kids to fuck.
Sounds like the lawsuit he was talking about was complete dogshit, but I'm OK with using this quote to imply that Lankford is possibly trafficking underage girls from Mexico. Traitors get the rope.
I'm of the opinion that they're taking him entirely out of context and using it to smear him because he's being a cocksucker right now. I don't see any links in the article but I'm also at work and speed browsing
I don't necessarily appreciate it because that's a Leftoid tactic, but I'm not gonna cry a river over it either.
They link the AP article that is quoted: https://archive.is/MWF1S
The AP article sourced a transcript of a deposition for a sexual assault case (15 year-old boy supposedly had sex with a 13 year-old girl). Presumably said deposition is not publicly available, so the AP is potentially our only window of context.
There's just one more quote taken from the deposition related to this line of questioning:
Watching him try to spin and gaslight on his twatter account is comedy gold. And the replies are pretty epic. Now he's pivoting to "but... but... look at the dead babies!!!" (abortion) to try and change the subject.
Sad thing is that he isn't up for reelection until 2029 and people will probably forget and reelect this pedo quisling.
Lankford sounds like a shitbag but I'm not seeing a video or a direct link to his quote. It's entirely possible (and most likely) that he was saying that a 13 year old and and a 15 year old doing the do and "consenting", and not "A 13 y/o girl can fuck a 30 y/o if she wants"
Like if someone here can provide me a link before I find my own I'd be happy to be corrected/wrong whatever. If he thinks kids can fuck anyone that he deserves a rope. But let's not shit our pants over someone saying some teen kids having sex when they shouldn't be is different than kids and adults. I think 2 year age difference at that age is a big difference, but there's context and background I'm missing atp. The article does the classic "stringing together a few quotes that don't have links to back it up" that can be used to make anyone say anything.
I'm healthily skeptical about this, that's all.
13 year olds, Dude.
Jesus