They've basically been forced to push back, as a radical feminist cult literally took over their government and much of their culture has been influenced by the impact of that. (Not to mention when you're in control, you get in everywhere, including most major companies).
Even with the (supposed) main head of the cult removed from power a few years ago, these things won't just go away.
And when I say they were radical feminists, I mean they were feminist (or rather, female supremacist) enough to make the ones we have here look like innocent angels. One of the more reprehensible scandals that came out was them literally sacrificing a ferry full of children to their "goddess".
The Megalia faction, and more specifically the 8 goddesses cult are some seriously messed up shit. South Korea was basically a feminist experimenting ground for the rest of the world.
the response to that ferry capsize was so horrendous. it had an entire school senior class on a field trip. nearly every single one of them drowned in their rooms as they were told to stay in place while the ferry slowly sank.
Meanwhile, all the higher-ups were scrambling to construct a narrative to cover their asses. The so-called trusted authorities will send you to your death if it means they don't lose face. Face is everything.
And when I say they were radical feminists, I mean they were feminist (or rather, female supremacist) enough to make the ones we have here look like innocent angels.
The charts show that American and British women are more liberal than Korean women. Does that mean the Koreans were just more radical in some non-liberal type of way?
The issue that we are having here is that the terms liberal and Neo-Marxist are basically incompatible.
Liberals, as a movement, believe in the empowerment of the individual.
Neo-Marxists (including feminists) believe in group identities (class, gender, race) as defining traits and they believe in the use of authoritarian power (guns) to make people do what they are told.
Neo-Marxists will use liberalism, as long as the individuals make choices that they agree with. With women and feminisms, they generally do. Women use the individual power and responsibility granted by liberalism to make selfish, self-serving choices, which in general advance the cause of feminisim.
None the less, Marxists and Neo-Marxists are ostensibly working towards a revolution, at which point they will pick up guns and make everyone do what they want. At that point the sham of liberalism will have served its purpose.
They've basically been forced to push back, as a radical feminist cult literally took over their government and much of their culture has been influenced by the impact of that. (Not to mention when you're in control, you get in everywhere, including most major companies).
Even with the (supposed) main head of the cult removed from power a few years ago, these things won't just go away.
And when I say they were radical feminists, I mean they were feminist (or rather, female supremacist) enough to make the ones we have here look like innocent angels. One of the more reprehensible scandals that came out was them literally sacrificing a ferry full of children to their "goddess".
The Megalia faction, and more specifically the 8 goddesses cult are some seriously messed up shit. South Korea was basically a feminist experimenting ground for the rest of the world.
the response to that ferry capsize was so horrendous. it had an entire school senior class on a field trip. nearly every single one of them drowned in their rooms as they were told to stay in place while the ferry slowly sank.
Meanwhile, all the higher-ups were scrambling to construct a narrative to cover their asses. The so-called trusted authorities will send you to your death if it means they don't lose face. Face is everything.
Didn't someone involved in that entire fiasco basically end up dead in a field somewhere with everyone basically turning a blind eye to the matter?
Damn, it's been a long while since I looked into that fuck up.
Eh, modern feminism is an iteration of marxism. They will sacrifice everything to retain power, including their precious "representation".
For those of you unaware: Raz0rfist goes over the story of the sinking of the Sewol
The charts show that American and British women are more liberal than Korean women. Does that mean the Koreans were just more radical in some non-liberal type of way?
The issue that we are having here is that the terms liberal and Neo-Marxist are basically incompatible.
Liberals, as a movement, believe in the empowerment of the individual.
Neo-Marxists (including feminists) believe in group identities (class, gender, race) as defining traits and they believe in the use of authoritarian power (guns) to make people do what they are told.
Neo-Marxists will use liberalism, as long as the individuals make choices that they agree with. With women and feminisms, they generally do. Women use the individual power and responsibility granted by liberalism to make selfish, self-serving choices, which in general advance the cause of feminisim.
None the less, Marxists and Neo-Marxists are ostensibly working towards a revolution, at which point they will pick up guns and make everyone do what they want. At that point the sham of liberalism will have served its purpose.
Why did I think South Korea was more advanced than this?