Anti-gun Leftists drilled into ESG-consumed corps' minds that ''guns = bad, and parents wont let their children play such game''.
It's not just the guns though. The whole thing is well done and very nicely priced ( $30 USD ).
PalWorld is everything a recent Pokémon should have been. A bunch of ''Dev newbies'' ate a mega franchise's lunch. Who would want to play some mediocre Pokémon N+1 when there is Palworld which did a good ''Monster Collection meets Ark survival'' game?
The Usual Suspects reeeing about the game for all the SJW reasons is just free publicity. ( Muh animal rights, muh slavery, muh AI ( both irrelevant and false anyway ), muh copying Pokémon ( oh my sweet innocent gamesJournoids with no clue of how saturated Japanese monster collection fighting games are. thousands of fictional monsters overlap greatly by now. You can no longer make one that won't look like something already done 3+ times ).
I watched some gameplay. My laptop can't run it. I will probably play it in a few years when I change computer and hardware improvements passively caught up with my limited budget.
Jade Cocoon let you literally beat the monsters down to capture by yourself, and it came out in 1998 before Pokemon had even codified the genre. It even had breeding mechanics that are still more complex than 99% of games, and it was on the PS1.
The only difference is this one gave cute things the guns, making the power of going viral with memes basically do all the marketing for it.
I always wonder what graphs or surveys they are looking at. Like the survey showing 50% of women liked comic books was thrown around but at the height of the MCU plenty of men and women said they liked comics but that meant they watched the MCU movies. Actually going to a comic books store and seeing who buys superhero comics is a better indicator. Add to that the fact that the Pakistani Ms Marvel comic was cancelled multiple times along with other female characters they kept trying to push.
You also had that survey from 14 saying women make up half of gamers that the shill media touted but when you broke that survey down it showed that in large numbers men played games you would expect and women tended to play games you would expect
You'd be shocked how many people who retain important, high-up positions responsible for critical company decisions and they are just dumb as rocks.
They think "okay so women make up 50% of the population so if we start catering to women HOLY SHIT WE'LL DOUBLE OUR PROFITS" which pleases the shareholders to no end and it dominoes from there.
I think it was in 2011 that the head of DC got ambushed at a convention panel by some stupid feminist whining about there being no females writing comics. He said he hires the best candidates but of course he backed down. I’ve said it a million times, if you wanted more girls to read comics then get someone to write a comic book with themes and stories that appeal to women
''Bruh, women are the majority of gamers bruh. You just have to put ugly brown women as protagonists into all games and women will drop candycrush to buy a $90 game from a big studio, bruh. You just hate women, bruh.''
If I may suggest adding in a little panel to the western one that mentions they should probably tack on the very thinnest definition of a video game to their new storefront that the customers have to pay 69.99 for the privilege of buying stuff from.
Look, it's an okay meme and all...
BUT IT'S SPELLED CUSTOMERS!!
"Costumers" are a different thing entirely!
What if it's just language costumisation? philophiraptors
Considering they're only dressing up in the guise of "gamer" and aren't actually one, "costumer" might actually be a valid spelling.
Waiting for the moment when they replace "furries" with "costumers".
Anti-gun Leftists drilled into ESG-consumed corps' minds that ''guns = bad, and parents wont let their children play such game''.
It's not just the guns though. The whole thing is well done and very nicely priced ( $30 USD ).
PalWorld is everything a recent Pokémon should have been. A bunch of ''Dev newbies'' ate a mega franchise's lunch. Who would want to play some mediocre Pokémon N+1 when there is Palworld which did a good ''Monster Collection meets Ark survival'' game?
The Usual Suspects reeeing about the game for all the SJW reasons is just free publicity. ( Muh animal rights, muh slavery, muh AI ( both irrelevant and false anyway ), muh copying Pokémon ( oh my sweet innocent gamesJournoids with no clue of how saturated Japanese monster collection fighting games are. thousands of fictional monsters overlap greatly by now. You can no longer make one that won't look like something already done 3+ times ).
I watched some gameplay. My laptop can't run it. I will probably play it in a few years when I change computer and hardware improvements passively caught up with my limited budget.
Have you thought about a Steamdeck? Runs most things and is fairly cheap, especially if you get one off of ebay.
I checked the Steam website.
Price is not so bad, but I'll wait. I'd rather save those $500 for the next laptop.
Current one ( AMD Ryzen 5 5625U 8GB RAM, I got for ~$580 USD ) is good enough for so many games. Just not the recent high-end graphic stuff.
Jade Cocoon let you literally beat the monsters down to capture by yourself, and it came out in 1998 before Pokemon had even codified the genre. It even had breeding mechanics that are still more complex than 99% of games, and it was on the PS1.
The only difference is this one gave cute things the guns, making the power of going viral with memes basically do all the marketing for it.
Megami Tensei was released in 1992.
I always wonder what graphs or surveys they are looking at. Like the survey showing 50% of women liked comic books was thrown around but at the height of the MCU plenty of men and women said they liked comics but that meant they watched the MCU movies. Actually going to a comic books store and seeing who buys superhero comics is a better indicator. Add to that the fact that the Pakistani Ms Marvel comic was cancelled multiple times along with other female characters they kept trying to push.
You also had that survey from 14 saying women make up half of gamers that the shill media touted but when you broke that survey down it showed that in large numbers men played games you would expect and women tended to play games you would expect
You'd be shocked how many people who retain important, high-up positions responsible for critical company decisions and they are just dumb as rocks.
They think "okay so women make up 50% of the population so if we start catering to women HOLY SHIT WE'LL DOUBLE OUR PROFITS" which pleases the shareholders to no end and it dominoes from there.
I think it was in 2011 that the head of DC got ambushed at a convention panel by some stupid feminist whining about there being no females writing comics. He said he hires the best candidates but of course he backed down. I’ve said it a million times, if you wanted more girls to read comics then get someone to write a comic book with themes and stories that appeal to women
Perfect impression of online shills
Pretty good infographic.
If I may suggest adding in a little panel to the western one that mentions they should probably tack on the very thinnest definition of a video game to their new storefront that the customers have to pay 69.99 for the privilege of buying stuff from.