Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

56
Supreme Court changes course !
posted 2 years ago by Telia 2 years ago by Telia +56 / -0

After Texas changed its name to Israel the Supreme Court has decided to let Texas keep its border wire!

A message from the Supreme Court:

"We are sorry we had no idea, Please ADL it was an honest mistake, we stand with Israel!"

13 comments share
13 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (13)
sorted by:
▲ 28 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 28 points 2 years ago +28 / -0

Jokes aside, the problem really is Barrett proving that she was a neocon plant, which is a shame as if they needed a female judge there was another one available at the time I think in Florida who was Latina and Thomas levels of based

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Kaige 19 points 2 years ago +19 / -0

They probably showed pictures of kids crying next to barbed wire and she folded. Kavanaugh is another plant - Barrett and him take turns so they both don't always look like traitors.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

On some of the big issues Kavanaugh at least takes the more conservative leaning.

That current case regarding the administrative state, he's on page with Thomas to essentially gut their powers, the deciding votes are Barrett and Roberts I think.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Barrett is the one with black children right? I think that demonstrates enough. That's neo-something. Not conservatism.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I agree but there was a push at the time for one, probably sold as 'we saw what happened yo Kavanaugh and got limited time to get one in, let's get a conservative woman in so we have a supreme Court majority'

They picked the neocon one though when there was an actual conservative female judge available...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– deleted 15 points 2 years ago +15 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

Which is why I usually fault the right for being short sighted in taking the red meat (or especially letting neocons choose)

We had the other lady, not ONLY would we have gotten Roe v Wade but this issue, maybe even more gun restrictions removed, there's an upcoming case in the supreme Court that targets the administrative state..

Also do you think we'd have AS MUCH lawfare against trump when they have 4 confirmed right leaning judge and one that is mostly right 90% of the time?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Erithal 14 points 2 years ago +14 / -0

do you think we'd have AS MUCH lawfare against trump when they have 4 confirmed right leaning judge and one that is mostly right 90% of the time?

Yes.

Because process is punishment, and the point of lawfare is to increase the cost of opposition by forcing our side to mount expensive legal defenses. As long as the left is waging total war, lawfare will continue to escalate.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

The process IS punishment don't get me wrong, it's why plea deals are so successful in America..

But at a high level, in this case presidential and supreme Court level, you risk a blowback that cripples you. We've seen a number of 'loses' for the Democrats on gun control recently because of their use if lawfare in relation to the second ammendment. The last thing they would want is these cases going up to an actual Conservative majority Supreme Court and losing the restrictions they had on their opponents.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Erithal 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

If the 'blowback' happens after the election has been influenced by the over 9000 indictments, then what difference does the supreme court ruling against them make?

The process has punished, the election been influenced. There is no effect a supreme court ruling can have which undoes the damage the lawfare has already inflicted. Given this effectiveness, why would it ever stop?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

Those African zygotes are creatures of God. They are precious and worth defending at all costs!

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy