Based or not? Tekken director says staff are adding boob jiggle in games without his permission
(www.sankakucomplex.com)
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Boob jiggle is always based.
So long as it's a woman and not a tranny character anyway.
Not real women, not real tits.
True, completely agreed.
Wait, does that Nikke based as they have boob AND butt jiggle WHILE shooting guns?
Gacha mobile shit is never based. It's a parasite cloaked in the skin of a game.
Why do I imagine this:
"Why do the boobs jiggle?"
"Oh some guys on the team keep adding it though I never made that requirement"
"So why don't you tell them to stop you're their boss?"
"......nah"
Probably far less than that.
What I'd bet is that nobody said anything about it one way or another. No instructions to add, no instructions to remove. The programmers, wanting to make a game that will sell, add basic-bitch boob physics because completely static tits on characters that have them would be extremely odd. Nobody approves because it's just an intrinsic aspect to the character like adding cloth simulation on a character with robes.
Eventually, some Leftist goes: "MAMALLIAN BREASTS?!!! IN A GAME I REFUSE TO PLAY?!!! IN CURRENT YEAR?!!!"
And then everyone turns around and claims plausible deniability so they can't get in trouble. No one looks into it because there's no point into launching that level of an investigation; and everyone knows that no one is actually upset about it.
Yeah, because there's boob physics and then there's boob physics. As everything else gets more realistic, static breasts look more awkward, like the character is made of plastic, if they don't bounce a little.
Its pretty noticeable in anime when the big titty waifu runs down a flight of stairs without even a little bounce at the end. Of course that's in 2d where it's less realistic, and the bounce has to be animated by hand. Leaving it out is much more noticeable in 3d, and implementing such basic physics interaction is trivial in any modern engine. (Rigging and modeling might need to account for it, but it's become easier from that end too.)
There's a big difference between gainaxing with each breast having its own physics calculation and taking over a full second to come to rest, and a character's breasts taking just a split second to catch up to a change in velocity. The first looks silly and sexualized (not that there's anything wrong with that in the right situation) while the second is basically needed for an animation to feel satisfying at all if the character is sufficiently realistic and has a medium sized or larger bust.
Agreed on all parts. My only issue is that if RDR2 has horse testicle physics by someone who wasn't a zoophile programmer, I can assume that some dedicated programmer worked on boob physics for months without ever even contemplating that his work could be taken as "boob physics" rather than "appropriate animation".
I dont think he cares. He was already on Twitter telling the usual suspects "Fuck off" when they were complaining about characters in the game being too sexy.
The usual suspects have found their "enemy" and they will forever attack him using any new fodder they can find on social media even if he does a 180.
Which is what yoko taro would do if square enix told him to make the characters more "modern". He would make one artist work solely on creating the most perfect boobs in existence.
They should make a mode for journalists that's not only easy, but all the breasts are covered up, and they are fully static.
Anything deeper than "Press the spacebar to win the game" is going to be too hard.
Why does Cookie-Clicker keep wining GOTY?
If it makes feminists seethe, it's probably based.
I miss Dead or Alive. :( Why did DOA6 have to be so shit and probably kill the franchise?
Feminists will be seething as if tit jiggle in this game is akin to the patriachy keeping women as sex slaves in every man's home.
To be fair they seethe no matter what the context. The idea that boys are having fun without their supervision keeps them up at night.
Muh objectification muh soggy knees
Objectification, but only when it's women. Men walking around topless showing off abs and pecs, even in shows meant for children, is perfectly fine to them of course. Always double standards.