How is a random mother teaching her daughter to be a normal woman (or at least what used to be normal) considered "news"
This is just sad.
tiktok and instagram postings
Oh, that's the reason why people are paying attention to this.
Dunno if excessive social media usage is the wisest idea if you're teaching your daughter to be "traditional". Being an example for others is a good thing, but considering women are involved and its social media, its hard to tell if this is completely legitimate or if its just a mask of narcissism (or somewhere in-between, who knows)
I dislike the trad-wives because they seem to not want to work, there's nothing to do once your kids are in school even if she spends 3 hours at the gym. She wouldn't be able to be a SAHW without being an influencer.
Yeah, being able and willing to work is important imo. My grandparents (who were essentially a second pair of parents to me) somehow took care of us and their children while both of them were working, which is insane but I consider it admirable.
They were also both capable of taking care of themselves if necessary. However, I believe that the terms "career" and "independence" are loaded terms for women, its a bad situation. If I had to choose between an '"independent career women" and "supportive homemaker", I'd choose the latter. But if the wife is actually willing to do anything for the family that she can (and isnt morally wrong ofc), I consider that to be the best option.
Well, it's actually a good thing for stay-at-homes to be able to get out. The influencer thing is the wrong direction. Women have been leaders in charity forever. IMO that's the best place.
Basically terminally online women reee'ing over the fact a mother is teaching her daughter the skills and mindset to be happy the rest of her life.
As if that sticks, you KNOW her daughter is going to be married as soon as high school ends or shortly after, she'll be one of the women that even the 1% of guys would fight over to be in a committed relationship with.
Yeah, on the surface of it being a voluntaryist I think "Okay, I do see the point of leaving the girl alone and letting her make her own mind up" at the same time, we know these people are a bunch of creepy online groomers and are hopping mad that the mother is taking an active part in her daughters' life so she doesn't get turned into a massive slut by the time she's 20 and that's not an exaggeration with a lot of young girls these days. So yes with most of these people trying to get vocal they're probably fucking weirdos.
I don't really like the idea of parents pushing too hard with values generally. As long as the girl is warned about the creeps out there looking to brainwash her that should be more than enough. The pushback from the other side is getting real and I do understand it because it's clearly the case of the mother going "I don't want my daughter to grow up to be an OnlyFans whore".
The reason I know this about these people too is because I remember when there was all this hubub about a mother who stepped in hard with this teenage girl who went viral on Instagram and took over her account. You know she had a talk with her around the back to make the point many of the men messaging her were just trying to fuck her and she probably saved that girl's whole social standing doing that so I get it. This is what happens when parents actually take a role in guiding their children instead of allowing children to be groomed online.
If parents don't "push too hard with values," there's a good chance something shitty will fill the void left by those values that weren't pushed. Not to say that it can never work, or that there aren't shitty parents that push shitty values out there.
This seems to be one of those topics where people will downvote you simply for having a nuanced opinion instead of automatically jumping on one side or the other. I do get your point, however I bet the retards out there are thinking that me going 'just don't go too far with it' is an automatic endorsement of zero monitoring from parents because they're retards.
I think it's even more nuanced than that -- it requires constant enforcement, even up until your child is 30 years old. Is that too old to be reinforcing ideals and moral principles? Absolutely not.
Anyone who has kids knows that once they hit 18 they are not an actual adult, they just have the legal capacities of one. But they're still a child, and think like a child and still need a ton of guidance.
In today's society, I've realised that too much parenting isn't enough. So long as it's not over-bearing, but rather actively present to add context and guidance at almost every turn.
Some people might think this is helicopter parenting, but it's not. Some of the channels I'm subscribed to (like Strong Successful Male) constantly goes over stories sent in to him by couples hit by infidelity. The biggest age-range where it happens is between 22 and 35. For almost all of the cases with Christian Conservatives, it's the woman who falters because of friends, loneliness, or co-workers.
So what does that have to do with parenting? That even those who claim to be Conservatives still didn't have enough of a foundation laid to avoid some very obvious pitfalls. And that the parents weren't stringent enough in pointing out examples where pitfalls occur, or how to spot them before the daughter left the household.
Unlike Libertarians, those who espouse Conservative values require much more steeled fortitude in the guarding of their principles, as Conservatives are the ones who have values that can be corrupted. It is the ability to be corrupted that society sees as an opportunity for tempting that individual, which is why it's necessary for parents to be much more effective and present in building up and instilling strong moral foundations in their children.
How is a random mother teaching her daughter to be a normal woman (or at least what used to be normal) considered "news"
This is just sad.
Oh, that's the reason why people are paying attention to this.
Dunno if excessive social media usage is the wisest idea if you're teaching your daughter to be "traditional". Being an example for others is a good thing, but considering women are involved and its social media, its hard to tell if this is completely legitimate or if its just a mask of narcissism (or somewhere in-between, who knows)
Good message at least, but dunno about that part.
I dislike the trad-wives because they seem to not want to work, there's nothing to do once your kids are in school even if she spends 3 hours at the gym. She wouldn't be able to be a SAHW without being an influencer.
Kids at school? Gross, big turn-off...
Yeah, being able and willing to work is important imo. My grandparents (who were essentially a second pair of parents to me) somehow took care of us and their children while both of them were working, which is insane but I consider it admirable.
They were also both capable of taking care of themselves if necessary. However, I believe that the terms "career" and "independence" are loaded terms for women, its a bad situation. If I had to choose between an '"independent career women" and "supportive homemaker", I'd choose the latter. But if the wife is actually willing to do anything for the family that she can (and isnt morally wrong ofc), I consider that to be the best option.
Well, it's actually a good thing for stay-at-homes to be able to get out. The influencer thing is the wrong direction. Women have been leaders in charity forever. IMO that's the best place.
Basically terminally online women reee'ing over the fact a mother is teaching her daughter the skills and mindset to be happy the rest of her life.
As if that sticks, you KNOW her daughter is going to be married as soon as high school ends or shortly after, she'll be one of the women that even the 1% of guys would fight over to be in a committed relationship with.
Yeah, on the surface of it being a voluntaryist I think "Okay, I do see the point of leaving the girl alone and letting her make her own mind up" at the same time, we know these people are a bunch of creepy online groomers and are hopping mad that the mother is taking an active part in her daughters' life so she doesn't get turned into a massive slut by the time she's 20 and that's not an exaggeration with a lot of young girls these days. So yes with most of these people trying to get vocal they're probably fucking weirdos.
I don't really like the idea of parents pushing too hard with values generally. As long as the girl is warned about the creeps out there looking to brainwash her that should be more than enough. The pushback from the other side is getting real and I do understand it because it's clearly the case of the mother going "I don't want my daughter to grow up to be an OnlyFans whore".
The reason I know this about these people too is because I remember when there was all this hubub about a mother who stepped in hard with this teenage girl who went viral on Instagram and took over her account. You know she had a talk with her around the back to make the point many of the men messaging her were just trying to fuck her and she probably saved that girl's whole social standing doing that so I get it. This is what happens when parents actually take a role in guiding their children instead of allowing children to be groomed online.
If parents don't "push too hard with values," there's a good chance something shitty will fill the void left by those values that weren't pushed. Not to say that it can never work, or that there aren't shitty parents that push shitty values out there.
This seems to be one of those topics where people will downvote you simply for having a nuanced opinion instead of automatically jumping on one side or the other. I do get your point, however I bet the retards out there are thinking that me going 'just don't go too far with it' is an automatic endorsement of zero monitoring from parents because they're retards.
I think it's even more nuanced than that -- it requires constant enforcement, even up until your child is 30 years old. Is that too old to be reinforcing ideals and moral principles? Absolutely not.
Anyone who has kids knows that once they hit 18 they are not an actual adult, they just have the legal capacities of one. But they're still a child, and think like a child and still need a ton of guidance.
In today's society, I've realised that too much parenting isn't enough. So long as it's not over-bearing, but rather actively present to add context and guidance at almost every turn.
Some people might think this is helicopter parenting, but it's not. Some of the channels I'm subscribed to (like Strong Successful Male) constantly goes over stories sent in to him by couples hit by infidelity. The biggest age-range where it happens is between 22 and 35. For almost all of the cases with Christian Conservatives, it's the woman who falters because of friends, loneliness, or co-workers.
So what does that have to do with parenting? That even those who claim to be Conservatives still didn't have enough of a foundation laid to avoid some very obvious pitfalls. And that the parents weren't stringent enough in pointing out examples where pitfalls occur, or how to spot them before the daughter left the household.
Unlike Libertarians, those who espouse Conservative values require much more steeled fortitude in the guarding of their principles, as Conservatives are the ones who have values that can be corrupted. It is the ability to be corrupted that society sees as an opportunity for tempting that individual, which is why it's necessary for parents to be much more effective and present in building up and instilling strong moral foundations in their children.
People who say you have no right to interfere in their homes feel completely entitled to interfere in yours.
That said, this is still attention whoring. If she were actually teaching her daughters to be good wives she'd teach them to stay tf offline.