'The Marvels' Director Nia DaCosta Describes Critics Of Woke Marvel As "Virulent And Violent And Racist And Sexist And Homophobi...
The Marvels director Nia DaCosta recently shared her opinion that critics of woke Marvel are "virulent and violent and racist — and sexist and homophobic."
Does it ever go thru their minds that what they made is trash?
Remember those leaks at Disney? I think at the very least they know what they're pushing is propaganda. However they live in such a bubble like most leftists they think the only people who could hate their work are hillbilly redneck stereotypes they know from 90's era shows.
They almost certainly believe this is going to appeal to the younger woke demographic except they don't take into account that the people they're trying to appeal to don't even watch this sort of thing. Oh they might spam about it on twitter but we know the type of shit they watch is more stuff like Hunger Games or they play shitty woke platformers if they consume any entertainment at all. They're chasing after a demographic that simply doesn't exist, they've got an image of an opposition demographic that doesn't exist as well.
Not even going into the woke stuff I've been thoroughly unimpressed by a lot of the crap coming out these days purely from a technical and design standpoint. It's fucking lazy, even the costume design and everything is getting lazy, you can't even be wowed by pretty graphics and there's better stuff I've seen from short films made in blender.
I blame DIE stuff for that. You either have diversity hires that will do the minimum amount of work or white guys that had their passion killed by those that hate them.
These people always remind me of the story of the grasshopper and the ant. Not the original version, with the grasshopper being a simple wastrel layabout, who dies of hunger and exposure when winter comes, no I mean the two subsequent versions, where he is turned into two types of social parasites. The first one gratefully earns his keep by providing entertainment to the ants during the winter months. In the second version it is the ants who are honored to provide food and housing to their entertainer God.
These people definitely fall into the second category. Their elitist brains and enlightened egos can't handle being in any way answerable to a group of consumers belonging either to the middle or the working class.
Never heard that second version before. Must be a very modern reiteration of it. I suppose the Grasshopper is some kind of Elvis? Maybe a fourth version is needed, which reminds us of the dangers of falling for Glamours. (The Grasshopper is found to be a ripoff artist.)
(And for version 2, the grasshopper can also play music while the ants work in the summer, or at least provide dinnertime entertainment, if he doesn't opt to just shift for himself in the woods and fields those months.)
I assumed it was A Bugs Life