No need to imagine. Ask men who have been railroaded by the legal system and "family courts" since the end of no-fault divorce because of a bias towards women. Hey, nobody likes racists, right? I suppose it's possible a notorious racist could get a fair trial, but I wouldn't bet on it. "Racism" is not against the law, but you're not allowed to be "racist" if you want to make it in life.
And there can be no West without impartial courts obligated to follow rules that favor no one.
No such thing. This kind of entrenched liberal philosophy even among normal people is why I'm doubtful the woke revolution will end any time soon. This person fails to acknowledge that extreme diversity of people and by extension ideas prevents you from having a functioning culture with any idea of impartial courts. There is ALWAYS some bias. Whether it be based on Christian traditionalism, protestant work ethic, common law, our ideas of property and ownership, or a belief in disparate impact theory. These traditions passed down by family and later codified in law school sort of become axiomatic principles in our minds that we are unable to remove from our decision making process. We can enjoy courts that appear fair when we live in cultures that are homogenous enough that bounds of the most extreme views (something related to the Overton window I guess) of any jurist fall within the acceptable range of fairness for all "reasonable persons" within that jurisdiction.
Yes the wokism cult will make things much worse, but it's magnifying a pre-existing problem. Until the whole world finally becomes a Communist paradise and then all courts will be fair and just to the workers of the world.
No need to imagine. Ask men who have been railroaded by the legal system and "family courts" since the end of no-fault divorce because of a bias towards women
Not just family courts. Look at Derek Chauvin's trial. At no point could he possibly have gotten a fair and unbiased trial when all the jury members were comprised of people biased against him.
No need to imagine. Ask men who have been railroaded by the legal system and "family courts" since the end of no-fault divorce because of a bias towards women. Hey, nobody likes racists, right? I suppose it's possible a notorious racist could get a fair trial, but I wouldn't bet on it. "Racism" is not against the law, but you're not allowed to be "racist" if you want to make it in life.
No such thing. This kind of entrenched liberal philosophy even among normal people is why I'm doubtful the woke revolution will end any time soon. This person fails to acknowledge that extreme diversity of people and by extension ideas prevents you from having a functioning culture with any idea of impartial courts. There is ALWAYS some bias. Whether it be based on Christian traditionalism, protestant work ethic, common law, our ideas of property and ownership, or a belief in disparate impact theory. These traditions passed down by family and later codified in law school sort of become axiomatic principles in our minds that we are unable to remove from our decision making process. We can enjoy courts that appear fair when we live in cultures that are homogenous enough that bounds of the most extreme views (something related to the Overton window I guess) of any jurist fall within the acceptable range of fairness for all "reasonable persons" within that jurisdiction.
Yes the wokism cult will make things much worse, but it's magnifying a pre-existing problem. Until the whole world finally becomes a Communist paradise and then all courts will be fair and just to the workers of the world.
Not just family courts. Look at Derek Chauvin's trial. At no point could he possibly have gotten a fair and unbiased trial when all the jury members were comprised of people biased against him.
Also lol at the idea of jury of your peers in current year +X.