Regardless of whether anyone is right to spam unrelated threads, I can think of very good reasons to care about people being sexually attracted to children... even if it's "in private". Who is most likely to start touching kids?
Disclaimer: I have no idea about this 'controversy', though I'm inclined to side with the anti-side, I just don't think that "not caring" is as much of a virtue as is pretended.
What if AI is used to create ultra realistic child porn? Is it okay for a person to look at that because it’s “not hurting anyone”?
I would argue that anyone looking at illustrations of kiddie porn is absolutely harming someone: himself. And we do plenty to protect people from harming themselves, including outlawing various medical practices, sales of certain items and substances, and even certain behaviors that are deemed harmful to society despite “not hurting anyone else”. I’m perfectly happy putting “consumption of animated child porn” on that side of the line.
The whole idea that 'harm' is the only reason for imprisonment or (preventative) detention should be dispensed with. If someone is attracted to children, then we cannot police his mind or his speech, but we certainly can prevent him from acting on it in any way - including watching 'harmless' computer-generated images.
I kind of doubt it. There's free-thought defenders who don't like Loli/shotacon but tolerate its existence, however, considering human instincts, the converse(?, not sure if right word) is probably true. There's people who are virulently against lolisho but aren't pedos themselves.
I believe there's four kinds of people in the pot:
Pro-free thinking / Tolerate-LS
Pro-free thinking / Pro-LS
Anti-LS / Average people
Anti-LS / Real pedos
There could be others types but these seem to be the common I've seen
I would add a subset of those that can enjoy LS but would openly kill you if you showed them REAL CP.
I'm just thinking of the traffic alone to those kinds of sites that offer LS, if EVERY ONE of them was a pedo then we'd need to flood the earth again to cleanse it. It's like equating violent video games to real world violence, the numbers alone don't match up compared to pedos within the pronoun parade.
It’s important to point out that your third group, which is people who are strictly anti-LS, is a supermajority of the population. If you showed that shit to 100 people, what percentage do you think would categorize it as child porn? 80%? 90%? 95%?
And before you compare this to the high percentages of people that go along with false vaccine and diversity narratives, remember that those consensus were created by insanely pervasive propaganda in every area of our lives. There isn’t really any preexisting normie consensus regarding loliporn, so cold polling the general population on this issue would result in mostly organic reactions. And I’m telling you, the overwhelming reaction would be “that’s child porn”.
Holy shit get lost already. Its obvious you are a newfag and you came in the sub, didnt like what it was and start whining about the place just like a leftist.
If you think its full of pedos then why dont you leave? why do you insist on staying around pedos?
That's fine, you're free to die on whatever hill for your beliefs. I just don't believe in wasting time on deaf ears and was trying to give you a hint.
I've heard of that connection (like weed leading to hard drug use) but it doesn't have much to do with this news or people on this forum. Why is everyone who hates censorship expected to approve of statutory rape? Ok honestly I didn't read the story. Did the teacher groom the student with lolisho?
Hahaha, you're seriously obsessed. I see you spamming this shit in various unrelated threads.
You touch kids, you go in the woodchipper. You don't touch kids, I don't care what animated porn you watch in private. This isn't complicated.
Regardless of whether anyone is right to spam unrelated threads, I can think of very good reasons to care about people being sexually attracted to children... even if it's "in private". Who is most likely to start touching kids?
Disclaimer: I have no idea about this 'controversy', though I'm inclined to side with the anti-side, I just don't think that "not caring" is as much of a virtue as is pretended.
What if AI is used to create ultra realistic child porn? Is it okay for a person to look at that because it’s “not hurting anyone”?
I would argue that anyone looking at illustrations of kiddie porn is absolutely harming someone: himself. And we do plenty to protect people from harming themselves, including outlawing various medical practices, sales of certain items and substances, and even certain behaviors that are deemed harmful to society despite “not hurting anyone else”. I’m perfectly happy putting “consumption of animated child porn” on that side of the line.
The whole idea that 'harm' is the only reason for imprisonment or (preventative) detention should be dispensed with. If someone is attracted to children, then we cannot police his mind or his speech, but we certainly can prevent him from acting on it in any way - including watching 'harmless' computer-generated images.
Would you let a loliporn enthusiast watch your children?
Why not?
Bruh, you're on day two of being butthurt about those debate threads derailing from the OP pointing out SoKorean porn bans from five years ago
I suggest letting it go before running the risk of mutating into an Imp.
Probably has something he's trying to hide on the issue.
I kind of doubt it. There's free-thought defenders who don't like Loli/shotacon but tolerate its existence, however, considering human instincts, the converse(?, not sure if right word) is probably true. There's people who are virulently against lolisho but aren't pedos themselves.
I believe there's four kinds of people in the pot:
There could be others types but these seem to be the common I've seen
I would add a subset of those that can enjoy LS but would openly kill you if you showed them REAL CP.
I'm just thinking of the traffic alone to those kinds of sites that offer LS, if EVERY ONE of them was a pedo then we'd need to flood the earth again to cleanse it. It's like equating violent video games to real world violence, the numbers alone don't match up compared to pedos within the pronoun parade.
It’s important to point out that your third group, which is people who are strictly anti-LS, is a supermajority of the population. If you showed that shit to 100 people, what percentage do you think would categorize it as child porn? 80%? 90%? 95%?
And before you compare this to the high percentages of people that go along with false vaccine and diversity narratives, remember that those consensus were created by insanely pervasive propaganda in every area of our lives. There isn’t really any preexisting normie consensus regarding loliporn, so cold polling the general population on this issue would result in mostly organic reactions. And I’m telling you, the overwhelming reaction would be “that’s child porn”.
Holy shit get lost already. Its obvious you are a newfag and you came in the sub, didnt like what it was and start whining about the place just like a leftist.
If you think its full of pedos then why dont you leave? why do you insist on staying around pedos?
That's fine, you're free to die on whatever hill for your beliefs. I just don't believe in wasting time on deaf ears and was trying to give you a hint.
I want to lock you in a room with AbleistSL and see what happens.
wtf i'm no fan of loli drawings but you'd have to be deranged to make this connection...
???
I've heard of that connection (like weed leading to hard drug use) but it doesn't have much to do with this news or people on this forum. Why is everyone who hates censorship expected to approve of statutory rape? Ok honestly I didn't read the story. Did the teacher groom the student with lolisho?