Funny how they didn't have a problem with that 'toxic misogynistic media culture' when it actually was the 2000s. Only when they need to cite it to take out someone they don't like does it come up. Just like they ignored Saddam's use of WMD until they needed a reason for another endless war.
Funny how they didn't have a problem with that 'toxic misogynistic media culture' when it actually was the 2000s
TIL that feminists didn't exist in the 2000s, and never complained about misogynistic media at that time. Of course, a feminist like you probably never noticed as you agreed with it.
I assume this is an editorial, but it doesn't excuse them from turning a news website into someone's personal blog. Again like with the Chads study I have to question the whole declaration of "toxic misogyny" here. What is author claiming? I thought the dictionary definition of misogyny was about hating women. The reverse is "misandry" or hating men. I never got the impression that Brand or even Howard Stern hated women. Where's that coming from?
"Toxic" is a vague insult that has different meanings depending on the speaker who uses them and their audience. It's practically slang. They might as well have written "Based", "sick", or "bitchin'." What point are you making here, NBC?
Yes, pretty much everyone can reject the claim. NBC provided no support or even said anything of substance at all. All I see is a company of so-called journalists who have existed in a lefty bubble for so long that they see nothing wrong with parroting out feminist queer-theory without a hint of reservation or irony.
Misogyny means you didn't do what the ladies wanted and immediately throw yourself at their mercy for daring to be born male. That is what all of the other name calling ("phobias") is all about as well.
LOL. You obviously haven't been paying attention. The left is sex positive when it involves women - women being promiscuous as they want is 100% great and should be supported by everyone. But this doesn't apply to men, of course. When it comes to sex and men, men are considered all evil rapists who take advantage of innocent women and subject them to horrific abuse.
To be fair though, this doesn't just apply to the "left" but feminists in general, including tradcucks of which there are many on this forum, who are also feminists as they would never criticise female behavior (even if they don't call themselves feminists and even if their moral code would tell them that such female behavior is wrong, they are unable to think badly of women).
I think males displaying sexuality is more oppressed today than it was 100 years ago. Men are only allowed to express sexuality when women say so which is no freedom of expression at all.
I think males displaying sexuality is more oppressed today than it was 100 years ago.
No doubt. But even 100 years ago feminists were already gaining power and were influencing society in a big way.
Men are only allowed to express sexuality when women say so which is no freedom of expression at all.
Exactly, in the past, there were restrictions on male (and female) sexuality, but were based on stronger logic and principles than "what women want men to do" which is the norm these days.
As I pointed out, modern tradcucks are feminists, not "traditionalists" as traditionalists obtained their sexual morality from God, not women. Apparently these so-called "traditionalists" don't believe the warning in Genesis 2 about deferring to women applies any longer.
According to Why Men Are the Way They Are when female restrictions were removed in the 60s male restrictions were doubled down on by the "conservatives". Likewise, according to Biohistory when restrictions are removed from women the culture always reverts to matriarchy, which kills off the host culture and people. It is patriarchy or bust.
Funny how they didn't have a problem with that 'toxic misogynistic media culture' when it actually was the 2000s. Only when they need to cite it to take out someone they don't like does it come up. Just like they ignored Saddam's use of WMD until they needed a reason for another endless war.
Makes you wonder what's going on in woke-run Hollywood as we speak?
TIL that feminists didn't exist in the 2000s, and never complained about misogynistic media at that time. Of course, a feminist like you probably never noticed as you agreed with it.
Okay so scotch tape is the second most transparent thing I can think of now.
Thanks for that.
I think their tape is for gaffing.
I like how the official twitters for major news media brands now sound like your annoying liberal wine aunt at thanksgiving.
I assume this is an editorial, but it doesn't excuse them from turning a news website into someone's personal blog. Again like with the Chads study I have to question the whole declaration of "toxic misogyny" here. What is author claiming? I thought the dictionary definition of misogyny was about hating women. The reverse is "misandry" or hating men. I never got the impression that Brand or even Howard Stern hated women. Where's that coming from?
"Toxic" is a vague insult that has different meanings depending on the speaker who uses them and their audience. It's practically slang. They might as well have written "Based", "sick", or "bitchin'." What point are you making here, NBC?
Yes, pretty much everyone can reject the claim. NBC provided no support or even said anything of substance at all. All I see is a company of so-called journalists who have existed in a lefty bubble for so long that they see nothing wrong with parroting out feminist queer-theory without a hint of reservation or irony.
Misogyny means you didn't do what the ladies wanted and immediately throw yourself at their mercy for daring to be born male. That is what all of the other name calling ("phobias") is all about as well.
LOL. You obviously haven't been paying attention. The left is sex positive when it involves women - women being promiscuous as they want is 100% great and should be supported by everyone. But this doesn't apply to men, of course. When it comes to sex and men, men are considered all evil rapists who take advantage of innocent women and subject them to horrific abuse.
To be fair though, this doesn't just apply to the "left" but feminists in general, including tradcucks of which there are many on this forum, who are also feminists as they would never criticise female behavior (even if they don't call themselves feminists and even if their moral code would tell them that such female behavior is wrong, they are unable to think badly of women).
I think males displaying sexuality is more oppressed today than it was 100 years ago. Men are only allowed to express sexuality when women say so which is no freedom of expression at all.
No doubt. But even 100 years ago feminists were already gaining power and were influencing society in a big way.
Exactly, in the past, there were restrictions on male (and female) sexuality, but were based on stronger logic and principles than "what women want men to do" which is the norm these days.
As I pointed out, modern tradcucks are feminists, not "traditionalists" as traditionalists obtained their sexual morality from God, not women. Apparently these so-called "traditionalists" don't believe the warning in Genesis 2 about deferring to women applies any longer.
According to Why Men Are the Way They Are when female restrictions were removed in the 60s male restrictions were doubled down on by the "conservatives". Likewise, according to Biohistory when restrictions are removed from women the culture always reverts to matriarchy, which kills off the host culture and people. It is patriarchy or bust.