I remember for years the media would trot out articles about some study that showed something like 5% of male bottoms became incontinent over time whenever they wanted gay rage bait. They'd have all these other doctors who'd tell us how flawed the studies were, but they were mostly just hysterical raging with almost no complaints.
Oddly enough, more and more women are becoming incontinent as anal sex becomes more common.
I've never understood anal sex, homo or otherwise. It strikes me as the archetypical "I really shouldn't put my penis in that. However...."
...I guess in that sense, I can understand it. It still seems like a really stupid and disgusting thing to do, for all parties involved, no matter how you present it.
you know a woman is really into you if she'll do anal with you, even though it's presumably less pleasure, more pain, and arguably humiliating for her.
Yes, people in relationships feel more loved and secure if their partner makes willing sacrifices for them and, as long as it doesn't permanently damage them, the more painful the sacrifice the more loved they feel.
This is why even normal men want to have anal sex with their wives/GFs every so often, and why normal women want men to buy them expensive shit for no reason like $30 for flowers that do nothing but die and waste money or $3000 rocks. All the time is weird and fucked up and destructive (either gifts or anal), but every so often its a good barometer for the relationship.
I skimmed the article and there is not even a hint of substance, just kvetching.
I remember for years the media would trot out articles about some study that showed something like 5% of male bottoms became incontinent over time whenever they wanted gay rage bait. They'd have all these other doctors who'd tell us how flawed the studies were, but they were mostly just hysterical raging with almost no complaints.
Oddly enough, more and more women are becoming incontinent as anal sex becomes more common.
I've never understood anal sex, homo or otherwise. It strikes me as the archetypical "I really shouldn't put my penis in that. However...."
...I guess in that sense, I can understand it. It still seems like a really stupid and disgusting thing to do, for all parties involved, no matter how you present it.
Small dick problems
Degenerates. No matter the country or era they're all the same.
Yes, people in relationships feel more loved and secure if their partner makes willing sacrifices for them and, as long as it doesn't permanently damage them, the more painful the sacrifice the more loved they feel.
This is why even normal men want to have anal sex with their wives/GFs every so often, and why normal women want men to buy them expensive shit for no reason like $30 for flowers that do nothing but die and waste money or $3000 rocks. All the time is weird and fucked up and destructive (either gifts or anal), but every so often its a good barometer for the relationship.
Porn has normalized it.
This. I don't even know what's being said throughout that whole thing.
A sloot trying to normalize sluttiness to appear higher value for Chad.
Or the beta she's trying to con into paying her bills when Chad moves on to younger and prettier women.
Yeah and despite fucking half the town her entire fertile years, she'll reward this beta with starfish sex once a month, at best.
Chads wont marry them either when theyre used up
Hoes mad: The article
Lol didn't even have to read it to assume that