Are there statistics on that? This is not a gotcha.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
A whole lot of noise to distract from your inability to produce even a shred of evidence for your claim.
And yeah, you should be able to back up empirical claims. This isn't Redditard "WUTS YOUR SOURCE FOR WHY IT'S BAD TO CUT YOUR DICK OFF", this was a specific claim which was apparently without foundation.
Are there statistics on that? This is not a gotcha.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Just to be clear, you make an empirical claim and have absolutely nothing to back it up with?
Good to know, thanks for the reply making it clear.
Suck my cock you sophist faggot. Go back to Reddit where you belong.
A whole lot of noise to distract from your inability to produce even a shred of evidence for your claim.
And yeah, you should be able to back up empirical claims. This isn't Redditard "WUTS YOUR SOURCE FOR WHY IT'S BAD TO CUT YOUR DICK OFF", this was a specific claim which was apparently without foundation.
Quite sad.