Also, this is not what people here want to hear, but I think the right is going to blame literally any bad health outcome for the next 30 years on the vaccine.
The beauty of an experimental injection that destroys your immune system - deliberately or not - is the built-in plausible deniability for all other negative outcomes. I mean if they won’t even seriously acknowledge the blood clots and heart attacks, then they certainly won’t be investigating the sharp increase in cancers and other serious illnesses correlating with the administration of the “vaccines”.
Seeing you, our most vocal local vaxtard, positively relishing in that plausible deniability isn’t surprising.
its dumb of us to blame all bad health events on vaccines.
Even at 3% myocarditis the vaccine is a TERRIBLE choice for healthy people who have a 1 in a million chance of dying from covid (many have already survived it)
We don’t need to make crazy claims of 100% fatality.
It makes it too easy for the left to claim we were lying.
The fatality rate doesn't have to be very high for the clotshot to be a prime suspect when things like this do happen because of how conditional probability works.
Even at 3% myocarditis the vaccine is a TERRIBLE choice for healthy people who have a 1 in a million chance of dying from covid (many have already survived it)
You get no argument from me there, but I haven't seen any convincing evidence showing 3%. But even with the lower percentages, it is pretty insane how they forced it on young, healthy people.
It makes it too easy for the left to claim we were lying.
50-year-old men have hardly been immune from heart problems before. So it's a little odd. But I get it, just like the vaccine has to be a panacea on one side, it has to be the root of all evil in the other.
Well, the vaccine will have negative knock-on effects for 30 years, especially since things like the lockdowns have made children retarded; but I'm more interested in the fact that ideological totalism has consequences.
The headline is a bit misleading.
Also, this is not what people here want to hear, but I think the right is going to blame literally any bad health outcome for the next 30 years on the vaccine.
The beauty of an experimental injection that destroys your immune system - deliberately or not - is the built-in plausible deniability for all other negative outcomes. I mean if they won’t even seriously acknowledge the blood clots and heart attacks, then they certainly won’t be investigating the sharp increase in cancers and other serious illnesses correlating with the administration of the “vaccines”.
Seeing you, our most vocal local vaxtard, positively relishing in that plausible deniability isn’t surprising.
So we're about two years into the immune system of 70-80% of people being 'destroyed'? I guess people barely needed it after all.
Don't force me to defend the regime, but didn't they withdraw Johnson and Johnson as well as AstraZeneca?
Please explain what makes someone a 'vaxtard'. I think everything I've said holds up rather well.
its dumb of us to blame all bad health events on vaccines.
Even at 3% myocarditis the vaccine is a TERRIBLE choice for healthy people who have a 1 in a million chance of dying from covid (many have already survived it)
We don’t need to make crazy claims of 100% fatality.
It makes it too easy for the left to claim we were lying.
Which might be the aim of the CIA bots among us…
The fatality rate doesn't have to be very high for the clotshot to be a prime suspect when things like this do happen because of how conditional probability works.
You get no argument from me there, but I haven't seen any convincing evidence showing 3%. But even with the lower percentages, it is pretty insane how they forced it on young, healthy people.
What they actually did was bad enough.
For heart problems it's going to be a strong contender for the foreseeable future because it's been shown to damage the heart, especially in men.
50-year-old men have hardly been immune from heart problems before. So it's a little odd. But I get it, just like the vaccine has to be a panacea on one side, it has to be the root of all evil in the other.
It should be easy enough to thoroughly investigate positive and negative outcomes in both groups if health authorities are willing and able.
Well that's the issue. They won't, we know they won't, and they will absolutely bury anything that even resembles the sort.
So that leaves us with the problem of assuming all smoke is a wildfire. A valid and educated assumption, but likely overcorrecting.
Well, the vaccine will have negative knock-on effects for 30 years, especially since things like the lockdowns have made children retarded; but I'm more interested in the fact that ideological totalism has consequences.