the political party that is supposed to be about family values and integrity
I thought we all realized that "muh family values" was a grift long ago? What does a federal political party being for family values mean anyway, especially when so many politicians are faggots and pedos? (not nearly as many as the Democrats but still)
I agree those women are distractions and useless except as rubber stamps for important votes, but agree much more with the "non-issue" part. I wouldn't even consider the left's frame for a second, when we know they are opportunistic liars who would be OK with the behavior done by anyone on their side. The only correct response to this transparent smear job - which opens with "known for her strong stance against drag queens and transgender people, claiming their mere existence 'sexualizes' spaces" - is to laugh and point at the pervert writer who has Boebert living rent free in his head. If this was AOC she'd be tweeting that he wants to date her so bad.
Why don't conservatives practice "No Enemies To The Right"?
Okay, forget family values. I threw that in there because she divorced her husband and is now doing this. It's a bad look regardless of where you stand.
But I will not bend on integrity. This behavior is not the behavior of someone who cares about their integrity of the perception of their integrity.
At best she's a liability, at worst she's a snake. What a great ally to have.
To be equally fair, she killed her neighbor's dog.
That doesn't seem to be the case at all. Hadn't heard it, but looking in to it, one of Boebert's neighbors shot another neighbor's dog. The dogs repeatedly were getting lose, killed Boebert's neighbors goats in one incident, Boebert's own goats in another.
Boebert did not kill any dogs, and the dogs that were killed...it sounds like they had it coming in a big way, thanks to their shitty owner.
It was yet another political smear job, where some irresponsible lunatic made it political. Boebert and the actual dog shooter were victims of the neighbor and her dogs. In a very real and measurable way; they lost animals to those dogs.
What does a federal political party being for family values mean anyway, especially when so many politicians are faggots and pedos? (not nearly as many as the Democrats but still)
Typically, it means that if you can't maintain and lead a properly functioning household, there's no way in the world you can properly lead a city, a county, a state, or a nation.
To be honest women should not be leading the household or trying to take national leadership roles in politics in the first place. She should be at home taking care of her children or doing community activities with the other women. As a society we're a little far removed from that understanding though.
Everything you said is 100% correct, and it's precisely why we've strayed so far from the basic concepts of gender roles that everything (especially in Western nations) is falling apart.
I thought we all realized that "muh family values" was a grift long ago? What does a federal political party being for family values mean anyway, especially when so many politicians are faggots and pedos? (not nearly as many as the Democrats but still)
I agree those women are distractions and useless except as rubber stamps for important votes, but agree much more with the "non-issue" part. I wouldn't even consider the left's frame for a second, when we know they are opportunistic liars who would be OK with the behavior done by anyone on their side. The only correct response to this transparent smear job - which opens with "known for her strong stance against drag queens and transgender people, claiming their mere existence 'sexualizes' spaces" - is to laugh and point at the pervert writer who has Boebert living rent free in his head. If this was AOC she'd be tweeting that he wants to date her so bad.
Why don't conservatives practice "No Enemies To The Right"?
Okay, forget family values. I threw that in there because she divorced her husband and is now doing this. It's a bad look regardless of where you stand.
But I will not bend on integrity. This behavior is not the behavior of someone who cares about their integrity of the perception of their integrity.
At best she's a liability, at worst she's a snake. What a great ally to have.
To be equally fair, she killed her neighbor's dog.
She's just a piece of shit person who doesn't care about anyone but herself. Why does anyone think she cares about other people?
That doesn't seem to be the case at all. Hadn't heard it, but looking in to it, one of Boebert's neighbors shot another neighbor's dog. The dogs repeatedly were getting lose, killed Boebert's neighbors goats in one incident, Boebert's own goats in another.
Boebert did not kill any dogs, and the dogs that were killed...it sounds like they had it coming in a big way, thanks to their shitty owner.
It was yet another political smear job, where some irresponsible lunatic made it political. Boebert and the actual dog shooter were victims of the neighbor and her dogs. In a very real and measurable way; they lost animals to those dogs.
First, it was another neighbor and not Boebert who shot those dogs.
Second, the only piece of shit is the neighbor who let their dogs roam and attack neighborhood livestock. Dogs who attack livestock are fair game.
Typically, it means that if you can't maintain and lead a properly functioning household, there's no way in the world you can properly lead a city, a county, a state, or a nation.
To be honest women should not be leading the household or trying to take national leadership roles in politics in the first place. She should be at home taking care of her children or doing community activities with the other women. As a society we're a little far removed from that understanding though.
Everything you said is 100% correct, and it's precisely why we've strayed so far from the basic concepts of gender roles that everything (especially in Western nations) is falling apart.
Women don't lead households