At this point, I'd be looking for a mechanical safe on which you can change the combination yourself. Since they all record the combo.
In theory, an electronic one could work as well, and it might be easier to recode. If you could have any sort of guarantee at all about the software. But I haven't seen like an open source safe.
There are a lot of reasons, but I guess a safe that you can open quickly is the best for actually defending yourself. Or guns not in the safe. I'm sure people do a combination of that. keep your collector shit in the safe and more utilitarian weapons around the house.
That's how my father did it - his nicer firearms, or those used exclusively for hunting, were in the locked gun cabinet. One for home defense was hidden beneath his shirts on a closet shelf.
Yeah, until you get shut out of every supplier/distributor for "reasons". Do the math ahead of time and come up with a way to mine your own iron and smelt your own steel to ensure that you don't get cancelled.
Fair where fair is due, I'm not seeing alot of that.
What I am seeing is alot of gun-owners basically calling for a repeat with Budweiser and to burn them to the ground.
And alot of so-called 'gun owners' suddenly stumbling out of the wood-work to mumble something about how suddenly 'cancel culture' is bad, or how this was totally a good thing due to the person in question being a Jan 6 protestor, or how getting rid of your safes won't mean a damn thing you guise, srsly.
I might not be looking in the right places, though.
You aren't, I don't really see anyone defending them other than "but what can they doooo" cowards or people who are just straight up pretending to totally be Conservative (despite having no opinions that fit with the common zeitgeist of one).
He just never misses a chance to say "conservatives bad" and jam it in a conversation.
Yeah. Enemy take 3 steps and then take 1 steps backwards, we call it a win. Instead, it should be they take 3 steps forward, we make them take 4 steps back.
There shouldn't be a backdoor at all. They shouldn't have that information regardless of what the feds have.
At this point, I'd be looking for a mechanical safe on which you can change the combination yourself. Since they all record the combo.
In theory, an electronic one could work as well, and it might be easier to recode. If you could have any sort of guarantee at all about the software. But I haven't seen like an open source safe.
There's also the issue of EMPs, which is a pretty big mark in favor of mechanical safes as well.
There are a lot of reasons, but I guess a safe that you can open quickly is the best for actually defending yourself. Or guns not in the safe. I'm sure people do a combination of that. keep your collector shit in the safe and more utilitarian weapons around the house.
That's how my father did it - his nicer firearms, or those used exclusively for hunting, were in the locked gun cabinet. One for home defense was hidden beneath his shirts on a closet shelf.
Nice business opportunity there
Yeah, until you get shut out of every supplier/distributor for "reasons". Do the math ahead of time and come up with a way to mine your own iron and smelt your own steel to ensure that you don't get cancelled.
Fair where fair is due, I'm not seeing alot of that.
What I am seeing is alot of gun-owners basically calling for a repeat with Budweiser and to burn them to the ground.
And alot of so-called 'gun owners' suddenly stumbling out of the wood-work to mumble something about how suddenly 'cancel culture' is bad, or how this was totally a good thing due to the person in question being a Jan 6 protestor, or how getting rid of your safes won't mean a damn thing you guise, srsly.
I might not be looking in the right places, though.
You aren't, I don't really see anyone defending them other than "but what can they doooo" cowards or people who are just straight up pretending to totally be Conservative (despite having no opinions that fit with the common zeitgeist of one).
He just never misses a chance to say "conservatives bad" and jam it in a conversation.
Yeah. Enemy take 3 steps and then take 1 steps backwards, we call it a win. Instead, it should be they take 3 steps forward, we make them take 4 steps back.