"The state has demonstrated a reasonable probability of success on its claim that the Amended Policies, if implemented, will have a disparate impact on transgender, gender nonconforming, and nonbinary youth,” Monmouth County Judge David Bauman wrote in issuing a preliminary injunction.
However, he noted that he was “not rendering any final judgments or determinations as to the merits of either the State or the School Boards’ claims,” pending the outcome of a larger, civil rights case related to the issue.
[...]
[New Jersey Attorney General Matthew] Platkin has argued that the districts’ policies pose a serious risk to children’s safety by outing transgender, non-binary and gender non-conforming students.
“As the Superior Court correctly found, and as we have argued from the start, it is likely that these new policies violate the rights of our most vulnerable residents by discriminating against them on the basis of gender identity or expression,” Platikin said in a statement.
The Attorney General added that the state is not seeking to target parental rights, but to reinstate previously existing school policies that had “protected the rights of transgender students and permitted schools to inform parents about their children based on individualized and non-discriminatory assessments of a particular child’s needs and circumstances.”
[...]
Gov. Phil Murphy — who lives within the confines of the Middletown Township school district — blasted the policies as illegal and simply harmful.
The governor, whose children have already graduated from high school, called the policies the result of a “culture war.”
“But let’s not violate the constitutional and civil rights of precious young folks in many cases, who are coming to grips with life as they grow up and grow older, let’s be respectful of that,” Murphy said.
The state has demonstrated a reasonable probability of success on its claim
However, he noted that he was “not rendering any final judgments or determinations as to the merits
This is a good example of a statement that's technically true but a motherfucking lie for all intents and purposes. One of the factors a judge weighs when deciding to grant a preliminary injunction is whether the requesting party will prevail on the merits, so when a judge grants one it's a strong signal of which way they're going to ultimately rule. It's usually not a guarantee, but when a judge outs himself as a groomer it eliminates all doubt.
[New Jersey Attorney General Matthew] Platkin has argued that the districts’ policies pose a serious risk to children’s safety by outing transgender, non-binary and gender non-conforming students.
This is such a hilariously stupid argument to make. The fucking AG is saying that their student body is so violent and out of control that they are claiming they CANNOT KEEP THEM SAFE FROM OTHER STUDENTS.
Think about that for a second. That is their argument, that they are so inept that they allowed violent individuals into every school who could threaten students who are 'different'.
And they have no problem with that apparently. It is more important to keep violent children in schools than to be "outed".
The fucking AG is saying that their student body is so violent and out of control that they are claiming they CANNOT KEEP THEM SAFE FROM OTHER STUDENTS.
Well, that's true in schools with a large Black population. The Highschool teachers are not safe either. Like the one who confiscated some electronics from a student using it in class. He went straight for the kill. Rammed into her and beat the living shit out of her as she was laying unconscious on the ground.
Yeah that's what I got out of it. Outing them to their parents means some nightmare scenario where the child might....get talked out of being a Homogayfag or tranny. The indoctrination might get interrupted.
Best further remove the parent from the equation to prevent such horrors.
This is a good example of a statement that's technically true but a motherfucking lie for all intents and purposes. One of the factors a judge weighs when deciding to grant a preliminary injunction is whether the requesting party will prevail on the merits, so when a judge grants one it's a strong signal of which way they're going to ultimately rule. It's usually not a guarantee, but when a judge outs himself as a groomer it eliminates all doubt.
This is such a hilariously stupid argument to make. The fucking AG is saying that their student body is so violent and out of control that they are claiming they CANNOT KEEP THEM SAFE FROM OTHER STUDENTS.
Think about that for a second. That is their argument, that they are so inept that they allowed violent individuals into every school who could threaten students who are 'different'.
And they have no problem with that apparently. It is more important to keep violent children in schools than to be "outed".
Well, that's true in schools with a large Black population. The Highschool teachers are not safe either. Like the one who confiscated some electronics from a student using it in class. He went straight for the kill. Rammed into her and beat the living shit out of her as she was laying unconscious on the ground.
Wouldn't the party threatening the trannies be the parents in this case, not the students?
Yeah that's what I got out of it. Outing them to their parents means some nightmare scenario where the child might....get talked out of being a Homogayfag or tranny. The indoctrination might get interrupted.
Best further remove the parent from the equation to prevent such horrors.
Uh, aren't those idiots gonna be outing themselves?
Also: Most of them wouldn't need any outing hadn't they been groomed into the delusion that they live in the wrong body.