Jan 6 Prisoner Held In A Closet.
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
The irony of all of this is that instead of making most people so super duper scared to never do it again, it simply makes them want to just do it better next time.
Because they wouldn't do any of this if they weren't terrified. Even with it probably being half their idea and half their men glowing in the crowds, it clearly unnerved the elites on a level we will never understand.
Knowing that, and knowing that even if you are peaceful about it they will treat you like this, only tells those angry enough to act on those desires to not hold anything back next time.
It basically was the Beer Hall Putsch, except in that Hitler was only sentenced to 5 years and served 9 months. So the government that America has now is remarkably more corrupt than Weimar. I can only imagine when the pendulum swings back how much harder things could be.
The Putch was planned. The riot was spontaneous and the entry into the building was aided by DC Police.
There was no riot, there was a crowd of people who walked towards and entered an open building.
The "riot" only happened after police began deploying smoke bombs and flash grenades against people peacefully congregating and waving flags.
Arguably it's fair to call what occurred on the other side of the building preceding the doors opening a small "riot", with pushing and shoving past law enforcement - but it was a gayop almost entirely orchestrated by embedded feds egging them on. Normal people climbed into windows that were already broken. Their only goal was to take pictures and yell "THIS IS OUR HOUSE". Misdemeanor at worst.
But it wasn't an "out of control" riot requiring police intervention to stop either. Unlike a typical sports riot in Los Angeles, violence and looting wasn't the intent. Once people got into the rooms they wanted to get into they were peaceful and orderly. I'm fairly confident had Ashley Babbitt not been murdered and people had gotten into the voting chamber, they would have simply stood around the room and chanted something about electors.
The government wants further violence to justify mass crackdown, a political purge, and a few public executions, (maybe shooting some protestors to death while they are at it).
They know good and god damned well, that this kind of thing will only agitate people more, which is what they are hoping to do.
If they were that certain of their ability to control the entire chain of events, they wouldn't have spent the last year literally pissing themselves in terror of people literally being able to walk near them. They'd have actually done something in response beyond bullying a bunch of guys with unconstitutional jailings.
I'm sure a couple of top feds are sitting smug about how they will totally enact full dictator control if the plebs even breathe wrong, while also posting tough guy posturing all over the place on top of it. But the observable reality demonstrates the opposite. A complete lack of any control, let alone ability to act out any form of mass crackdown beyond their shitty urban sprawls.
That's my point. They know they don't have the political capital they need yet to machine gun unarmed protestors Apartheid style. They're willing and able, they just don't have the rationalization for it yet. They need violence in order to do that.
And still, it's only rarely going to be the actual police. They'd much rather let Antifa do the hard work of burning people's homes down. Then they can roll into the city as a force "just trying to maintain peace", and seizing their homes and selling it to their favorite developer.
And that was my point. They aren't able. They think they might kinda be, but they definitely want you to think they are. Because that's the only true shield they have left, the illusion of power that we saw shimmer by a bunch of retards walking into a building.
That's why they are clamping on it so hard, because it revealed they really aren't as able and all powerful as they want you to think. Further "violence" might justify a response from them, but they have little ability to carry beyond a very minimal (relatively) reaction to try and maintain the illusion of them being this all powerful entity that you stand no chance of fighting.
Reminds me of a story of a Chinese general, leading his army to meet up with the Emperor's forces. The general is delayed due to a storm and, when it's apparent they're going to be late, he turns to his second in command. "What's the penalty for not arriving on time?" he asks his second. "Death," the other man responds.
The general thinks this over for a second, and then asks "What's the penalty for rebellion?"
Yeah that's what I was trying to get at. That's why, despite people's emotional tantrums, we don't just throw "Death" as the sentence for rape or molestation or hurting a child. Because if its death for those, then its also death for just killing them and killing them leaves no witnesses so we are incentivizing worse crimes.
They've left execution as basically the only place left for actual insurrection, which means that they have left no actual reason not to do so next time. If sitting at Pelosi's desk to disrespect her gets you fucking solitary, why not shoot her and become an American hero? Punishment is nearly the same regardless, if not arguably a better end.