If Russia didn't invade when it had the chance, to create a frozen conflict, then obviously the fact that the border is "unsecured" isn't much of an issue.
The glaring difference, even if you can call Mexico a 'hostile nation', is that I don't see millions of Russians illegally entering Finland for whatever reason.
Even if that were an issue, it really has nothing to do with NATO membership.
As for Mexico, that's your thing. Call it a hostile nation all you like, but the situation isn't nearly analogous because Russians aren't going to want to sneak into Finland.
The Russians have no fear of such a thing. In the past two years they've gotten our measure. That is precisely why they're presently engaged in tearing down the hedgemony of globalism in front of the whole world.
Well duh. The enemy's strengths are that they're perfidious, dishonest and sneaky. Not that they're smart or competent.
Particularly in military matters. The Ukro campaign makes that abundantly clear. The people running the war on "our" side don't have military experience more apt than a video game, and it shows.
If Russia didn't invade when it had the chance, to create a frozen conflict, then obviously the fact that the border is "unsecured" isn't much of an issue.
Ignoring the glaring example otherwise.
The US/Mexico border. Which has been a disaster for the United States.
Large borders with hostile nations is a bad thing.
The glaring difference, even if you can call Mexico a 'hostile nation', is that I don't see millions of Russians illegally entering Finland for whatever reason.
Even if that were an issue, it really has nothing to do with NATO membership.
Not even if. They are a hostile nation, to the extent that their criminal satrapy can even be called a nation at all.
It doesn't matter what you see. The capability is there. Large indefensible borders are a major risk factor.
The defense is Russia not wanting to get nuked.
As for Mexico, that's your thing. Call it a hostile nation all you like, but the situation isn't nearly analogous because Russians aren't going to want to sneak into Finland.
The Russians have no fear of such a thing. In the past two years they've gotten our measure. That is precisely why they're presently engaged in tearing down the hedgemony of globalism in front of the whole world.
Because (illegal) immigrants are the same thing as actual armies shooting people and blowing up homes!
You sound the same as when leftists claim "words are violence". Though admittedly certain states might be better off if Mexico invaded for real.
Shooting houses and stuff? You've clearly never been to LA.
Yeah it is the same. Not being able to control entry means you get whatever the enemy chooses to bring.
What’s the weather like in Moscow today, comrade?
Hey now, he's not in Moscow. He's in St Petersburg where most of their propaganda operations are.
Well duh. The enemy's strengths are that they're perfidious, dishonest and sneaky. Not that they're smart or competent.
Particularly in military matters. The Ukro campaign makes that abundantly clear. The people running the war on "our" side don't have military experience more apt than a video game, and it shows.