You want wind so you do not put more CO2 in the atmosphere so you cut down trees that not only help regulate CO2 but they are also a habitat for the wildlife the same people pretend to care about.
Not sure how much energy do windmills produce but it makes me question if anyone involved in this made any calculation on the effectiveness in reducing CO2 emissions.
There are literally people out there that think we should have 0% CO2 in the atmosphere. They aren't shitposting. They really think that anything higher than literally fucking nothing is too high.
Actually, that makes a great question for the climate alarmists: how much CO2 should be in the atmosphere?
If I recall, anything less than 200ppm means you're fast-tracking your way to extinction, and at 150 you're utterly and completely fucked. The eco-terrorists wouldn't live long enough to get it to 0%.
Trying to reason with people who think they can fly planes, or consume anything with ''carbon-neutrality because my ticket paied for planting trees'' can't work.
They didn't think to hold those beliefs. They just Listened.
There is no guarantee the planted trees won't be cut down in X years for whatever reason. There is no guarantee they won't burn in a fire. If you haden't paied to get trees planted, natural regeneration would have done it. You just added extra GHG emissions by having people produce, care-for, transport and plant those trees.
I wanna see a carbon neutral ticket where they promise "for every ticket purchased we will slaughter 300 cats and bury them in an underground anaerobic pressure vault to replace the oil used". Just to see if cultists can still get the warm and fuzzy feelings from a more direct carbon capture route.
You want wind so you do not put more CO2 in the atmosphere so you cut down trees that not only help regulate CO2 but they are also a habitat for the wildlife the same people pretend to care about.
Not sure how much energy do windmills produce but it makes me question if anyone involved in this made any calculation on the effectiveness in reducing CO2 emissions.
There are literally people out there that think we should have 0% CO2 in the atmosphere. They aren't shitposting. They really think that anything higher than literally fucking nothing is too high.
Actually, that makes a great question for the climate alarmists: how much CO2 should be in the atmosphere?
Having more CO2 in the atmosphere promotes plant growth. You're literally increasing their food supply.
0% CO2 in the atmosphere sounds like the fastest way imaginable to kill all life on the surface of the Earth.
Almost like that's the goal of the left...
Reminds me of the 90s movie, The Arrival, except with the political slant of the Useful Human Idiots flipped.
If I recall, anything less than 200ppm means you're fast-tracking your way to extinction, and at 150 you're utterly and completely fucked. The eco-terrorists wouldn't live long enough to get it to 0%.
You could ask this of +90% of "climate experts," and they wouldn't even understand the question. It's depressingly retarded.
Okay but there are also literally people out there who believe they can communicate with bugs.
Don't lump crazies in with regular people, it only gives weight to their beliefs
About 350ppm
And that number is based on, what?
Understood data of the effects of carbon concentration
Trying to reason with people who think they can fly planes, or consume anything with ''carbon-neutrality because my ticket paied for planting trees'' can't work.
They didn't think to hold those beliefs. They just Listened.
There is no guarantee the planted trees won't be cut down in X years for whatever reason. There is no guarantee they won't burn in a fire. If you haden't paied to get trees planted, natural regeneration would have done it. You just added extra GHG emissions by having people produce, care-for, transport and plant those trees.
I wanna see a carbon neutral ticket where they promise "for every ticket purchased we will slaughter 300 cats and bury them in an underground anaerobic pressure vault to replace the oil used". Just to see if cultists can still get the warm and fuzzy feelings from a more direct carbon capture route.