There are literally people out there that think we should have 0% CO2 in the atmosphere. They aren't shitposting. They really think that anything higher than literally fucking nothing is too high.
Actually, that makes a great question for the climate alarmists: how much CO2 should be in the atmosphere?
If I recall, anything less than 200ppm means you're fast-tracking your way to extinction, and at 150 you're utterly and completely fucked. The eco-terrorists wouldn't live long enough to get it to 0%.
There are literally people out there that think we should have 0% CO2 in the atmosphere. They aren't shitposting. They really think that anything higher than literally fucking nothing is too high.
Actually, that makes a great question for the climate alarmists: how much CO2 should be in the atmosphere?
Having more CO2 in the atmosphere promotes plant growth. You're literally increasing their food supply.
0% CO2 in the atmosphere sounds like the fastest way imaginable to kill all life on the surface of the Earth.
Almost like that's the goal of the left...
Reminds me of the 90s movie, The Arrival, except with the political slant of the Useful Human Idiots flipped.
If I recall, anything less than 200ppm means you're fast-tracking your way to extinction, and at 150 you're utterly and completely fucked. The eco-terrorists wouldn't live long enough to get it to 0%.
You could ask this of +90% of "climate experts," and they wouldn't even understand the question. It's depressingly retarded.
Okay but there are also literally people out there who believe they can communicate with bugs.
Don't lump crazies in with regular people, it only gives weight to their beliefs
About 350ppm
And that number is based on, what?
Understood data of the effects of carbon concentration
Understood by who?