And because they're funded by Trudeau, this "conservative" paper had to post the far left response: Adam Zivo: Yes, 'straight pride' is offensive https://archive.is/bye3W
"gay people aren't respected in every single country yet, therefore we must continue parading around the streets of America with our cocks hanging out."
At least we have justification- without us our species and thus civilization wouldn't exist.
Did you know that all of history's most iconic & important figures (with the possible exception of Jesus) were the result of heterosexual sex?? From Napoleon to Shakespeare, Aristotle to Darwin, Plato to Einstein, da Vinci to Obama, Mozart to Elton John...all of them exist because of straight people having straight sex!!
Straight Pride is stupid and unhelpful as a serious effort in the same way that "Men's Liberation" is.
You can not win a battle with Leftists by accepting their dialectic and trying to play an Uno Reverse.
Straight Pride can only be understood as an anti-parallel, affirmative, narrative: "I'm proud of being a providing, protecting, and centering father for my inspirational, restorative, and empathetic wife, so that our relationship can turn my boys into good men, and my girls into good women."
"Pride" as in being an advocate for your identity politic does nothing to undermine the Leftist framework that you are choosing to play the foil in.
Then you'll get a reply about some Based Homosexual Married Couple in a healthy monogamous gay relationship, raising their boys to be good men. "Why it gotta be straight though?!"
How about calling it "being normal pride" or something similar? Anything to remind them that they're degenerate weirdos and try to force them to rationalize their own position. I know it won't work and they'll just scream things like "bigoted ist-aphobe", but at least it will annoy and it's better than letting them determine the rules of engagement.
You can't be proud of being average. The reason pride is a sin is because when you are proud of mediocrity, it is simply narcissism, and an abandonment of trying to improve yourself. You should only be proud of excellence.
Straight pride? The fuck is this? We donβt need any of this pride shit when we should just be promoting normality.
Especially when we're falling into the same trap the degenerates are in, basing our identity on our sexuality. Better we have something like a day around an event, an old tradition or aspect of an old faith and make the way you celebrate it is being with family or friends who aren't huge degenerates.
"Super straight" is just letting the enemy determine the rules of engagement. A straight man isn't going to want to fuck another man and there's nothing "super" about not wanting to fuck a tranny. A man claiming to be a woman is still a man and he will never be a woman.
If that were all it was, lefties wouldn't have cracked down as hard and as quickly as they did.
Superstraight revealed that trannies have a difficult relationship with consent. In the current culture, supposedly, anyone has any right to deny or revoke consent, for any reason, at any time. "Any reason" includes biological sex. That means there's at least one reasonable and completely unassailable context in which trannies could not punish you for denying them.
It forced them into a position where you can either side with trannies, or respect consent, but not both. And of course, every single non-leftist person, even the normies, are going to respect consent. The trannies threw fits, because they are entitled little predators, and for just a moment, that truth was undeniable. All leftists could do is shut it down as hard and as fast as possible.
And because they're funded by Trudeau, this "conservative" paper had to post the far left response: Adam Zivo: Yes, 'straight pride' is offensive https://archive.is/bye3W
"gay people aren't respected in every single country yet, therefore we must continue parading around the streets of America with our cocks hanging out."
OK faggot lol
Hardly, it's a tongue-in-cheek reaction meant to point out leftist hypocrisy. It's more social frustration than actual "pride."
Por que no los dos?
At least we have justification- without us our species and thus civilization wouldn't exist.
Did you know that all of history's most iconic & important figures (with the possible exception of Jesus) were the result of heterosexual sex?? From Napoleon to Shakespeare, Aristotle to Darwin, Plato to Einstein, da Vinci to Obama, Mozart to Elton John...all of them exist because of straight people having straight sex!!
STRAIGHT PRIDE WORLDWIDE
πβ Gay pride
ππ Straight wrath
Straight Pride is stupid and unhelpful as a serious effort in the same way that "Men's Liberation" is.
You can not win a battle with Leftists by accepting their dialectic and trying to play an Uno Reverse.
Straight Pride can only be understood as an anti-parallel, affirmative, narrative: "I'm proud of being a providing, protecting, and centering father for my inspirational, restorative, and empathetic wife, so that our relationship can turn my boys into good men, and my girls into good women."
"Pride" as in being an advocate for your identity politic does nothing to undermine the Leftist framework that you are choosing to play the foil in.
Then you'll get a reply about some Based Homosexual Married Couple in a healthy monogamous gay relationship, raising their boys to be good men. "Why it gotta be straight though?!"
Well, the question was explicitly about straights.
How about calling it "being normal pride" or something similar? Anything to remind them that they're degenerate weirdos and try to force them to rationalize their own position. I know it won't work and they'll just scream things like "bigoted ist-aphobe", but at least it will annoy and it's better than letting them determine the rules of engagement.
You can't be proud of being average. The reason pride is a sin is because when you are proud of mediocrity, it is simply narcissism, and an abandonment of trying to improve yourself. You should only be proud of excellence.
I get what you mean. It's just that my point wasn't to actually celebrate mediocrity, but rather to point out that they're freaks and degenerates.
Uno reverse is a small tactic useful for shutting up morons, but no, it is not a grand strategy capable of taking us to victory.
It's like: "Nice meme, but there's a war."
Straight pride? The fuck is this? We donβt need any of this pride shit when we should just be promoting normality.
Especially when we're falling into the same trap the degenerates are in, basing our identity on our sexuality. Better we have something like a day around an event, an old tradition or aspect of an old faith and make the way you celebrate it is being with family or friends who aren't huge degenerates.
"Super straight" is just letting the enemy determine the rules of engagement. A straight man isn't going to want to fuck another man and there's nothing "super" about not wanting to fuck a tranny. A man claiming to be a woman is still a man and he will never be a woman.
If that were all it was, lefties wouldn't have cracked down as hard and as quickly as they did.
Superstraight revealed that trannies have a difficult relationship with consent. In the current culture, supposedly, anyone has any right to deny or revoke consent, for any reason, at any time. "Any reason" includes biological sex. That means there's at least one reasonable and completely unassailable context in which trannies could not punish you for denying them.
It forced them into a position where you can either side with trannies, or respect consent, but not both. And of course, every single non-leftist person, even the normies, are going to respect consent. The trannies threw fits, because they are entitled little predators, and for just a moment, that truth was undeniable. All leftists could do is shut it down as hard and as fast as possible.