BBC “news” manufacturing the climate hoax
(twitter.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Climate change is a great hoax for getting control of the population and taxing them so why would they stop.
They can literally take money from you and sit on their asses as the "problem" fixes itself. Forget cleaning rivers and oceans, that would have actual work out into it, no instead buy this over priced filter from my friend so you don't have to pay a fine (still have to pay taxes though).
It is so transparent but the news says doomsday was yesterday so people will nod and vote for green initiatives like sheep while not even bothering to think about alternatives like nuclear or what have you.
State controlled energy will fit well with those "15 minute cities" they're planning.
While I don't agree that climate change in its entirety is a 'hoax', this is exactly what I expect. The same people who now shout rather loudly that WE ARE DOOMED, in ten years when it turns out that we are not doomed, will be taking credit for having fixed the 'crisis' that never was. You see, only because of Greta Thunberg's spergery did we avoid catastrophe.
It's interesting that "I care about the environment" nowadays means that you want to put all resources into something that has very little benefit (reducing CO2), while ignoring cleaning rivers or having more nature.
In fact, they're cutting centuries-old forests to burn the trees as "carbon-neutral" energy. That's the "green" movement for you.
There was a poll in Europe that asked people how much they would be willing to give up for 'climate change'. While the vast majority said they were concerned about it, it was something like 10 euros a year. I'd be willing to pay 100 euros or something, but they're robbing us of thousands and spending all our other taxes poorly.
I should have been a bit more clear. I do believe that the climate changing is a thing and that we do have to deal with it. It's the political side of "climate change" that I am calling a hoax.
I see it like some old priest of Zeus telling people that lightning is Zeus being angry and then taking credit when it stops. Lightning/Climate changing is a natural phenomenon that we have to deal with, and though we can affect it somewhat we aren't majorly responsible for it happening.
However we do need to find ways to survive both, in case of lightning we got lightning rods to channel that energy towards the ground leaving most things around it relatively unscathed as an example. Similarly we probably will have to find a way to deal with the heat and possible problems that arise from it (energy consumption, climate controlled fields, etc.) while also taking into account a likely dip in temperatures in the far future.
It's the excessive taxation on and laws to make certain actions mandatory (as well as the media bludgeoning people with it) that I call a hoax.
Not to mention how counterproductive the measures they take are in dealing with the actual problem. Filters and electric cars won't do jack against the heat and if anything will draw power that could be used to cool down people's work places and houses. Not to mention the dumb as fuck green energy initiatives that almost always bite them in the ass or are just a massive waste of space.
What kind of electric cars saved the world the last time about 120k years ago?
They are showing the quiet part out loud a bit there. That chart shows the earth's temperature to be pretty much cyclical and that the current rise in temperature depicted is on pattern with pretty much all of them.
It was Greta Thunberg’s Fetal Alcohol ancestor
They use "proxies for temperatures" and discard the proxies that contradict their hypothesies. In all sciences. Which is why there is a reproductibility crisis.
( most studies cannot be replicated without re-introducing the biased methodology of the original paper )
Cherry-picking.
No matter who is in political power, the woke are always in social power. As you say, that power needs to be broken. But how?
Nitter link
Is it just me or is there no thread after the 1st tweet?
Here's a Nitter link. Twitter insists on being weird.
where's the thread?