Tucker Carlson interviews Andrew Tate
(twitter.com)
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Am I the only one who gives zero fucks about Andrew Tate?
Dude moves to Romania, suffers the consequences. I give no shits.
I guess I am too old to know anything about Tate.
I would recommend the first 30 seconds before Andrew Tate is on camera.
He’s talking about how easy powerful enemies can manufacture false allegations.
As tucker says : “Julian Assange published evidence of US military war crimes in Iraq. Days later he was arrested for “rape”. Years later those “rape charges” were completely dropped. A fact almost never mentioned by the news media. ”
Julian Assange exposed the governments, what has this baldy faggot done to warrant the persecutions, seems like most of his problems were caused by his own stupidity in the first place
I posted it but I don't care about him either, I was a bit surprised about Tucker going there to interview him, considering he is doing this on his own money.
I'm not surprised at all.
I don't know anything about Tate but it is abundantly clear that he is being unfairly targeted.
Anyone being unfairly targeted by the current powers that be is an ally, I don't really care what they say or do. If they piss off the same shitty people that I hate then I am all for them.
Tucker seems to realize that. Hopefully he starts pushing what is happening to the J6 political prisoners next. It is really disgusting how targeting these people has become normal and approved behavior.
I know we are supposed to hate Andrew Tate on here. But the important point is that these false allegations by the deep state can be manufactured against ANYONE they target.
As tucker says : “Julian Assange published evidence of US military war crimes in Iraq. Days later he was arrested for “rape”. Years later those “rape charges” were completely dropped. A fact almost never mentioned by the news media. ”
I don't think anyone here hates Tate, just indifferent. He did move to Romania, a country he acknowledges has strong ties to US and will do anything that the US asks them to. Romania is not exactly known for adherence to the law. So he kind of brought this down on himself, although not sure what other country would have been better. Maybe Poland?
Russia...
Moldavia probably.
It's pretty long, has a bunch of interesting talking points- To which some have status and a bunch are just a bit odd.
After hearing him being dragged through the dirt from the MSM then to actually hear his talking points, I'm not actually surprised that he has a large following of males who are otherwise lacking in positive male role models.
Is not very interesting, I've listen for 30-40 mins of it, is nothing new and I don't trust the dude enough to say there are no bases for his charges. However I was impress that Tucker flew to Romania to take the interview, I did not expect this interview to ever happen. Is Tucker even getting payed for this interviews?
I managed to sit through the first 20 minutes of Tate. After hearing he spent his time reading the Koran, I actually looked him up.
Hmm. No thanks, but there's definitely worse 'role models' for young males.
He stopped being a pornographer and then converted to Islam
There's a hilarious saying that's apt here - "The cat ate a 100 mice and then went for the Haj."
All your sins forgiven! For the simple price of some foreskin. At least his two heads match.
Can I just add - apparently twitter has recently added 2x playback speed. Increases your "information per second"
1x speed gang 😎👍
Does he ask Tate to explain bragging about scamming desperate men? If not, that says a lot about Tucker.
https://odysee.com/@TheDailyRake:6/andrewTate:b9
I don't care much about Andrew Tate but I am impress about Tucker and his interviews since he went to twitter.
Two sides of the pro-woman grift.
What made you flip on Tate? The interview where he brags about scamming men is pretty old. Did he finally do something truly egregious in your eyes, like "transphobia" or saying a non-evil woman exists?
This one.
Imagine positioning yourself as the savior of young men from a feminized society and then repost this crap.
Ah so you would have been fine with Tate scamming the shit out of desperate men as long he doesn't retweet
AWALTNAWALT. You truly are a man of principles.Don't you mean NAWALT? AWALT would be agreeing with me.
I'm not fine with it, but at the time, it seemed that he was doing something to the enemy.
Now it's obvious he was a reverse psychology ploy from them, a perfect false flag who will lead the weak to metaphorical slaughter and allow them to crack down on "misogyny" after his arrest.
Yes, corrected
Or, ya know, hear me out. It's not "them." He's just a scammer getting himself rich.
You have to be pragmatic when you're fighting a battle of this scale. Anyone who seems to be denting their armor becomes your ally, regardless of ethics. You're preventing something far worse.
That's also possible, but the intense coverage of his rise makes me think this crap is as scripted as the "Republicans" talking about women's sports.
Lure broken men in, pretend you're fighting the enemy with them. Sell them a lie that good ones are out there.
Tate didn't realize they were going to destroy him too when he sold us out.
He's not denting anyone's armor. He is capitalizing on social decay to enrich himself.