Didn't need to. I pointed out you were using Communist for everything, so you immediately switched to Leftist in the next part. Its a sad little backpedal you did when called out, that you are now ranting with as many words as possible to try and obfuscate being called on.
It's not a back-pedal. You intentionally declared that I asserted a world-wide Communist party only, no Socialist involved, conspiratorial cabal. Which I never said. When I explained to you what I meant, you declared that I was backpedaling from the lie you accused me of.
You are really caught up on that little bit of mockery I threw in aren't you?
This was a different accusation you made of me, as if it was my attempt to de-convert your caricature of yourself.
Hey, so do I! In fact, my adult daughter is a lesbian ace! My best friend for my entire life is a hardline anti-Christian Bidenbro! Fit that into your paradigm of what you believe I believe.
That's easy: you're a hypocrite, trying to sound tough on the internet. You can either stand by your statement that you can't live with these people, and they are guilty of the crimes of the people you are associating them with; or you can reject your position. You can either bludgeon your daughter to death for being associated with pedophillia, or you can admit that you can live with people who succumb to Gender Theory.
Why would you care about repentance when you've already established that you can't live with these people, and they are equally guilty of crimes that others committed? There's simply no room for repentance in your position. You've already established that de-conversion is impossible, that's why you've taken the hardline stance of proclaiming guilt by association. Repentance would be deconversion, which you've rejected out of hand.
You've made your position crystal clear, you just don't actually believe in it.
Anyone who succumbs to Gender theory is in a cult
People can't be de-converted from this cult
A harmonious society can't exist while this cult exists within it.
All cult members are equally guilty, and should be treated as such
You've allowed no avenue for repentance. You've allowed no avenue of withdraw. You've allowed no avenue for escape.
Accepting anyone who repents violates 2, 3, and 4. Repentance assumes that people can de-convert. A repenting dissident who's beginning to understand that the cult is wrong, has to continue to pushed from society according to 3. If someone repents, and you treat them differently from those who do not, you are not treating them as being equally guilty
Of course, that assumes that you were actually holding the position you argued. I made the good faith assumption that you actually believe in the shit you say. That was my mistake. At this point, your whole argument becomes moot because you haven't been honest at all. You lie about the shit I say, then you lie about what you actually believe, so there's not much left to talk about.
No this was your point. You've lost the plot so much trying to paint my beliefs that you are confusing my actual beliefs with the ones you've made up and I responded to with "if that's true, then X."
The very idea of describing it like a "cult" is to remove agency and responsibility for their actions, which is not something I ever believe in doing for anyone.
So you've managed to once again, paint your own caricature of my beliefs, mixed in your own, and then declare hypocrisy because your beliefs aren't congruent with my own.
Which is why the whole argument was moot a long time ago, you seem to be incapable of understanding that your aren't the arbiter of truth and describing reality. So thereby anyone who doesn't agree with your point is not just wrong, but intentionally being wrong by not assimilating your assertions into their beliefs.
Once again leading to what I said last time:
I suppose when you believe yourself to have all the answers and world figured out, narcissism and its fragility comes with the territory.
It's not a back-pedal. You intentionally declared that I asserted a world-wide Communist party only, no Socialist involved, conspiratorial cabal. Which I never said. When I explained to you what I meant, you declared that I was backpedaling from the lie you accused me of.
This was a different accusation you made of me, as if it was my attempt to de-convert your caricature of yourself.
That's easy: you're a hypocrite, trying to sound tough on the internet. You can either stand by your statement that you can't live with these people, and they are guilty of the crimes of the people you are associating them with; or you can reject your position. You can either bludgeon your daughter to death for being associated with pedophillia, or you can admit that you can live with people who succumb to Gender Theory.
Why would you care about repentance when you've already established that you can't live with these people, and they are equally guilty of crimes that others committed? There's simply no room for repentance in your position. You've already established that de-conversion is impossible, that's why you've taken the hardline stance of proclaiming guilt by association. Repentance would be deconversion, which you've rejected out of hand.
You've made your position crystal clear, you just don't actually believe in it.
You've allowed no avenue for repentance. You've allowed no avenue of withdraw. You've allowed no avenue for escape.
Accepting anyone who repents violates 2, 3, and 4. Repentance assumes that people can de-convert. A repenting dissident who's beginning to understand that the cult is wrong, has to continue to pushed from society according to 3. If someone repents, and you treat them differently from those who do not, you are not treating them as being equally guilty
Of course, that assumes that you were actually holding the position you argued. I made the good faith assumption that you actually believe in the shit you say. That was my mistake. At this point, your whole argument becomes moot because you haven't been honest at all. You lie about the shit I say, then you lie about what you actually believe, so there's not much left to talk about.
No this was your point. You've lost the plot so much trying to paint my beliefs that you are confusing my actual beliefs with the ones you've made up and I responded to with "if that's true, then X."
The very idea of describing it like a "cult" is to remove agency and responsibility for their actions, which is not something I ever believe in doing for anyone.
So you've managed to once again, paint your own caricature of my beliefs, mixed in your own, and then declare hypocrisy because your beliefs aren't congruent with my own.
Which is why the whole argument was moot a long time ago, you seem to be incapable of understanding that your aren't the arbiter of truth and describing reality. So thereby anyone who doesn't agree with your point is not just wrong, but intentionally being wrong by not assimilating your assertions into their beliefs.
Once again leading to what I said last time: