But I would imagine there are certain jobs that can be done by someone with a lower IQ? Also not putting them in a position they can’t handle would be a good policy. That does zero favors
Also not outing them in a position they can’t handle would be a good policy. That does zero favors
Which is how we get to the notion that racism can be a positive thing. If we address reality and the IQ distribution of the various racial populations, we'd arrive at some societal messaging telling blacks that no they aren't going to be doctors and rocket scientists but they might find some success working with their hands as a mechanic and that they can succeed in life if they play to their strengths rather than their weaknesses. Put them on a path to success rather than allow them to wallow in failure as they try to live up to the standards of other races. No one likes to try something and fail, and when you set someone to a task at which they are destined to fail, their inevitable failure will breed resentment and bitterness, which is what we see festering in many American blacks.
Stefan Molyneux has made this point. Sure you may have some outliers that can be doctors but holding everyone to the same standard is key. Seeing more Whites/Asians in a field is not reason to whine endlessly about disparities. We live in a society where anyone who has it better than you must have achieved it through some sinister method and then the whole zero sum game idea is pushed. I remember reading Discrimination and Disparities by Sowell and wishing it could be mandatory for middle school kids
we'd arrive at some societal messaging telling blacks
or we don't tell [insert item here] anything. Why would we have societal messaging targeting [insert item here].
There may very well be racial traits limiting what an individual can and cannot achieve, but I really think keeping the focus on race (just reversing the message) doesn't do anyone any favor.
But I would imagine there are certain jobs that can be done by someone with a lower IQ?
There are, and they might even pay a decent living if we secured the border and told the corporations that are addicted to an infinite supply of cheap labor to eat shit.
Lower IQs lower inhibitions. Which means poorer reaction to stimuli and handling emotions.
Even the most braindead retard jobs out there don't want the liability of having someone who might fly off the handle at unknown stimulus and possibly hurt themselves, the equipment/product, or others.
Anybody below 80, we're basically putting on a society-wide puppet show to pretend their contributions matter, because to do otherwise would potentially foster violent resentment.
We have a difficult path ahead. How do we show due reverence to the value of all human life, when there is no dignity to be found in work? How do we make people whose jobs can be replaced by a server with a few graphics cards in it feel like their contributions are valuable?
If we don't find a way to do this, we're going to be failing our fellow man in a catastrophic way.
There used to be value in less skilled work. This societap unbalance has been deliberately destroyed by the government and corps working together to destroy our industrial base to turn us into a "service economy". When they brag about that term, what they're actually doing is laughing about making a perpetual underclass of corporate slaves by filling the economy with shit jobs.
There's always going to be a need for physically demanding jobs require some level of skill, and it doesn't take a very high IQ to do those jobs. Where lower IQ people tend to have problems is abstract thinking. Such a person might be perfectly capable of doing math required for their work because they do it over and over without having to apply the concepts to new things, even if they would never understand it in a more theoretical context. The problem is those jobs will always have shitty pay as long as we have hordes pouring across the Rio Grande looking for a handout.
But I would imagine there are certain jobs that can be done by someone with a lower IQ? Also not putting them in a position they can’t handle would be a good policy. That does zero favors
Which is how we get to the notion that racism can be a positive thing. If we address reality and the IQ distribution of the various racial populations, we'd arrive at some societal messaging telling blacks that no they aren't going to be doctors and rocket scientists but they might find some success working with their hands as a mechanic and that they can succeed in life if they play to their strengths rather than their weaknesses. Put them on a path to success rather than allow them to wallow in failure as they try to live up to the standards of other races. No one likes to try something and fail, and when you set someone to a task at which they are destined to fail, their inevitable failure will breed resentment and bitterness, which is what we see festering in many American blacks.
Stefan Molyneux has made this point. Sure you may have some outliers that can be doctors but holding everyone to the same standard is key. Seeing more Whites/Asians in a field is not reason to whine endlessly about disparities. We live in a society where anyone who has it better than you must have achieved it through some sinister method and then the whole zero sum game idea is pushed. I remember reading Discrimination and Disparities by Sowell and wishing it could be mandatory for middle school kids
or we don't tell [insert item here] anything. Why would we have societal messaging targeting [insert item here].
There may very well be racial traits limiting what an individual can and cannot achieve, but I really think keeping the focus on race (just reversing the message) doesn't do anyone any favor.
Ideally to counteract the current cultural momentum which is quite destructive.
There are, and they might even pay a decent living if we secured the border and told the corporations that are addicted to an infinite supply of cheap labor to eat shit.
Lower IQs lower inhibitions. Which means poorer reaction to stimuli and handling emotions.
Even the most braindead retard jobs out there don't want the liability of having someone who might fly off the handle at unknown stimulus and possibly hurt themselves, the equipment/product, or others.
Anybody below 80, we're basically putting on a society-wide puppet show to pretend their contributions matter, because to do otherwise would potentially foster violent resentment.
We have a difficult path ahead. How do we show due reverence to the value of all human life, when there is no dignity to be found in work? How do we make people whose jobs can be replaced by a server with a few graphics cards in it feel like their contributions are valuable?
If we don't find a way to do this, we're going to be failing our fellow man in a catastrophic way.
There used to be value in less skilled work. This societap unbalance has been deliberately destroyed by the government and corps working together to destroy our industrial base to turn us into a "service economy". When they brag about that term, what they're actually doing is laughing about making a perpetual underclass of corporate slaves by filling the economy with shit jobs.
There's always going to be a need for physically demanding jobs require some level of skill, and it doesn't take a very high IQ to do those jobs. Where lower IQ people tend to have problems is abstract thinking. Such a person might be perfectly capable of doing math required for their work because they do it over and over without having to apply the concepts to new things, even if they would never understand it in a more theoretical context. The problem is those jobs will always have shitty pay as long as we have hordes pouring across the Rio Grande looking for a handout.