Imp is right because society can truly be looked at as men vs. women and that frame of reference makes A LOT of sense. It isn't necessarily the whole story but it's highly correlative. Male interests vs. female interests is a huge part of society. Women have completely and utterly dominated the men in western society.
When you see the recent British Cycling race classification decision and the public's reaction to that news and what happened to the men's category compared to the women's one, it all makes sense.
Dear god Scotland is off the deep end, while Canada went of the deep end in purging their population, Australia in authoritarianism, Scotland has gone off the deep end with misandry but as a twist have kept trying to push trans shit so is essentially creating an internal war due to the conflicting ideologies.
It's hilarious, horrifying and interesting that this essentially is killing off the Scottish independence movement completely. The UK government is at it weakest right now, it'd be easy to get another vote and referendum right now but because of their instability they have no leverage to do it and everyone in Scotland is focusing inwards as a war between TERFs and trans begins with men behind hi by both sides.
This is the proposed misogyny law that I referred to in earlier posts that Scotland was planning to introduce and other parts of the UK and the world would follow. And yes, quickly glancing the explanation document, even a man approaching a woman in real life or online by matching with her or sending a message or saying hello to her is a violation of this law. It is in effect a law to ban unrequited love and rejection. We haven't even got to involuntary celibates who also fall in the scope of this law yet! In the future of Scotland, you had better be a successful man with the ladies if you want to avoid prison!
In order to wonder why it is just women and not men getting protections, you need to look at the recent British Cycling decision on categories in elite cycling. They maintained the women's category based on anger against the "erasure of women's identity". Their compromise was to erase men's identity and replace it with an open category which allows women to compete with men but not the other way round! This was met with celebration and cries of "common sense prevails" by the public. Now there are demands to expand this solution to men's spaces and men's toilets. Ultimately it demonstrates that the public want protections for women but are happy for men's identity to be erased and double standards to be implemented as opposed to equal rights while acknowledging sexual dimorphism in the past.
It's why feminism has political power, influence and while people don't identify with the label in public because of its negative connotations, they privately support their ideas and goals. While men's rights activists advocating for equality between the sexes and calling out inequalities against men are a small minority who are routinely mocked, belittled and condemned.
Imp isn't right. The western world is absurdly gynocentric, which we all pretty much agree on, and the synchronized, clownish coddling of women is leading to our ruin. But that doesn't mean that women are cartoon villains actively colluding to genocide men, and it certainly doesn't mean that women are the one and only problem we face.
But that doesn't mean that women are cartoon villains actively colluding to genocide men
Women are gullible tools that the elites use to gut western civilization. Giving women the right to vote, which they didn't earn, is possibly more damaging to the west in the long run than all the wars in the 20th century.
But that doesn't mean that women are cartoon villains actively colluding to genocide men
You ever spoken to one? I have never met one who wasn't fairly open and vocal about this exact thing. Never. Not one. I'm nearly 40
They enjoy a maximized unapologetic in-group bias. It's easily observed at even the most cursory glance.
I absolutely agree that the illuminati isn't made of feminists though. Mud hut theory/ Orwells description of them as the best kind of spy but not the leadership etc
I have never met one who wasn't fairly open and vocal about this exact thing.
Really? You haven't met a single woman who doesn't openly talk about genociding men?
Honestly, I'm sure a lot of them parrot it just as a nonsense feminist rhetoric, it doesn't mean they're actively colluding to do it. They will however support by default anything that makes things better for themselves at your expense.
Hey isn't it interesting that Imp could come here and blame all women along the lines of a unifying conspiracy theory which holds that women control everything and are working a long game to societally destroy men? That Imp could do that at least 10x a day every day for like a year with no trouble?
I think that's interesting because if you change the word women to the word jew, you have broken the rules and a moderator will snap into action.
It's just interesting isn't it? It's almost like women have fuckall power over you and there are literal jewish people in charge of things including even small forums in which gentiles might dare to speak.
Is that interesting, or am I being unreasonable? You can say x about literally anyone on all the Earth except them. Here. On KIA where the moderators ignore N bombs and ignore 99% other forms of thoughtcrime.
Even more interesting is that just observing that borders on breaking the rules, since it is an observation about the real life behavior of jewish persons, and not female, black, gay etc persons, acting together toward a common goal. A special protection from the mods, that's nice. I bet all those "women" "in charge" of things, hellbent on destroying your life, are pretty jealous of what jews can hobble together despite- per our rules- being apparently so powerless to affect us.
"Blacks are working together toward a common goal(it's hostile to you)"
ALLOWED SPEECH
"Gays are working together toward a common goal(it's hostile to you)"
ALLOWED SPEECH
"Women are working together toward a common goal(it's hostile to you)"
ALLOWED SPEECH
Jews are wor-
RULE VIOLATION
So just pretend this is an Imp post and that I accidentally typed jew instead of woman once or twice. That way, my comment remains compliant with the moderators' sensibilities and I functionally maintain the right to say a perfectly legal thing on a "free speech oriented" forum. It's the perfect hack so just work with me and pretend!
Imp is right because society can truly be looked at as men vs. women and that frame of reference makes A LOT of sense. It isn't necessarily the whole story but it's highly correlative. Male interests vs. female interests is a huge part of society. Women have completely and utterly dominated the men in western society.
When you see the recent British Cycling race classification decision and the public's reaction to that news and what happened to the men's category compared to the women's one, it all makes sense.
Any English Speaking country is dangerous for men at this point.
Dear god Scotland is off the deep end, while Canada went of the deep end in purging their population, Australia in authoritarianism, Scotland has gone off the deep end with misandry but as a twist have kept trying to push trans shit so is essentially creating an internal war due to the conflicting ideologies.
It's hilarious, horrifying and interesting that this essentially is killing off the Scottish independence movement completely. The UK government is at it weakest right now, it'd be easy to get another vote and referendum right now but because of their instability they have no leverage to do it and everyone in Scotland is focusing inwards as a war between TERFs and trans begins with men behind hi by both sides.
This is the proposed misogyny law that I referred to in earlier posts that Scotland was planning to introduce and other parts of the UK and the world would follow. And yes, quickly glancing the explanation document, even a man approaching a woman in real life or online by matching with her or sending a message or saying hello to her is a violation of this law. It is in effect a law to ban unrequited love and rejection. We haven't even got to involuntary celibates who also fall in the scope of this law yet! In the future of Scotland, you had better be a successful man with the ladies if you want to avoid prison!
In order to wonder why it is just women and not men getting protections, you need to look at the recent British Cycling decision on categories in elite cycling. They maintained the women's category based on anger against the "erasure of women's identity". Their compromise was to erase men's identity and replace it with an open category which allows women to compete with men but not the other way round! This was met with celebration and cries of "common sense prevails" by the public. Now there are demands to expand this solution to men's spaces and men's toilets. Ultimately it demonstrates that the public want protections for women but are happy for men's identity to be erased and double standards to be implemented as opposed to equal rights while acknowledging sexual dimorphism in the past.
It's why feminism has political power, influence and while people don't identify with the label in public because of its negative connotations, they privately support their ideas and goals. While men's rights activists advocating for equality between the sexes and calling out inequalities against men are a small minority who are routinely mocked, belittled and condemned.
Imp isn't right. The western world is absurdly gynocentric, which we all pretty much agree on, and the synchronized, clownish coddling of women is leading to our ruin. But that doesn't mean that women are cartoon villains actively colluding to genocide men, and it certainly doesn't mean that women are the one and only problem we face.
Women are gullible tools that the elites use to gut western civilization. Giving women the right to vote, which they didn't earn, is possibly more damaging to the west in the long run than all the wars in the 20th century.
You ever spoken to one? I have never met one who wasn't fairly open and vocal about this exact thing. Never. Not one. I'm nearly 40
They enjoy a maximized unapologetic in-group bias. It's easily observed at even the most cursory glance.
I absolutely agree that the illuminati isn't made of feminists though. Mud hut theory/ Orwells description of them as the best kind of spy but not the leadership etc
Really? You haven't met a single woman who doesn't openly talk about genociding men?
Honestly, I'm sure a lot of them parrot it just as a nonsense feminist rhetoric, it doesn't mean they're actively colluding to do it. They will however support by default anything that makes things better for themselves at your expense.
Hey isn't it interesting that Imp could come here and blame all women along the lines of a unifying conspiracy theory which holds that women control everything and are working a long game to societally destroy men? That Imp could do that at least 10x a day every day for like a year with no trouble?
I think that's interesting because if you change the word women to the word jew, you have broken the rules and a moderator will snap into action.
It's just interesting isn't it? It's almost like women have fuckall power over you and there are literal jewish people in charge of things including even small forums in which gentiles might dare to speak.
Is that interesting, or am I being unreasonable? You can say x about literally anyone on all the Earth except them. Here. On KIA where the moderators ignore N bombs and ignore 99% other forms of thoughtcrime.
Even more interesting is that just observing that borders on breaking the rules, since it is an observation about the real life behavior of jewish persons, and not female, black, gay etc persons, acting together toward a common goal. A special protection from the mods, that's nice. I bet all those "women" "in charge" of things, hellbent on destroying your life, are pretty jealous of what jews can hobble together despite- per our rules- being apparently so powerless to affect us.
ALLOWED SPEECH
ALLOWED SPEECH
ALLOWED SPEECH
RULE VIOLATION
So just pretend this is an Imp post and that I accidentally typed jew instead of woman once or twice. That way, my comment remains compliant with the moderators' sensibilities and I functionally maintain the right to say a perfectly legal thing on a "free speech oriented" forum. It's the perfect hack so just work with me and pretend!
is a handshake account
Alright Imp, how many alts does this make?
Everything feminists accuse others of, is the roadmap of things they will do themselves given the chance.
"I want to walk around in public without being afraid!
->
"We're passing laws so if you walk around in public you have to be afraid
You an alt or just a lurker?
...Lemme get you started...
When in the course of human events...
Post Removed: OP, you don't have enough history in this sub to post new threads, and you can't cite users in your post.
He wasn't right about anything, he was a monomaniacal retard and it's good that he seems to have fucked off for good.
I'm sure he will resume posting when his ban is up. He's still super active in TheDonald.
Damn, I was hoping enough people started telling him to fuck off that he got the hint and fucked off.