so basically, I know the weapon that's causing the damage but ignore the weapon itself and just accept that there is damage all over the place. got it.
With Jews, the best people can do is point that there's a lot of Jews in woke companies
I'm by no means all in on the jewish thing but there's no need to strawman them that hard.
They usually start with he plethora of books and statement where they explicitly state that white people are a problem to be eliminated or controlled. Then corollate that with the large number of jewish people in positions of power in institutions that just so happen to act against the interests of white men especially.
The explicit statements are by no means numerous enough to make a convincing case that all jews deserve scorn, but some of them are just as much demonstrably pieces of shit as the random black thugs filming themselves stomping asian grannies, and are generally better at leveraging their hatred too.
Everybody acknowledges the feminist hate too dingus, you're just mad that no-one else will take that as cause to go all genocidey like you. Hence why even people with a more holistic approach are apparently on the "other side" of your single issue mindset.
The explicit statements are by no means numerous enough to make a convincing case that all jews women deserve scorn,
At this point I'm fine with forcibly dismantling their all of their power and means. Sure it might disenfranchise a few innocent individuals, but it's a drop in the bucket compared to the number of people other individuals in that quadrant of the demographic venn diagram have used their power to torment, so to me it's a clear net gain. Desperate times call for desperate measures. Utopia has never been further from reach in our lifetimes, so I'm not stupid enough to cling to utopian ideals, I've made peace with the idea of creating a smaller injustice to correct a larger one. But it doesn't mean I'm ready to join you on all the way on your crusade for the final solution to the female problem.
You talked about the entertainment industry, and as proof you link to a video citing... some Jewish activists whose actions you don't like, having nothing at all to do with the entertainment industry.
Oops. But it's a good insight into the chaotic mind of a Stormfag, the Gleichschaltung of everything that is "JEW BAD".
Calm down, Cathy Newman, and try to actually read what people say, rather than making stuff up.
that the social justice movements of the 20th and 21st century, women’s rights, civil rights, and LGBTQA+ rights, have nothing to do with the pathetic state of the entertainment industry?
This may shock you, but I believe in linear time, so I don't think the current pathetic state caused things to happen in the past.
So no, you showing a video saying that Jews participated in the civil rights movement made no mention of entertainment and is therefore irrelevant to your claims.
Sorry, wasn't paying attention, the temperature in Tel Aviv is just too damn high!
OK, so you now realized that the video you posted was completely irrelevant, even though you tried to defend it at first, and now posted your second Google result?
You're attempting rational argument with these people. It's not possible, because whatever reason they offer is not the actual reason they hate the Jews. They also cannot be argued out of it.
Easy solution? Work to reduce the influence of both groups and it doesn't matter who is more correct, things will improve.
If imp and the stormies could agree that dismantling the power base of millionaire jewish women C-suites fits within both their agendas, I figure that'd be more productive than constantly bitching at each other and there's enough of those alone to keep both sides busy for the next few years.
Focus on the tasks you have in common and pool your efforts.
This would work, except for the fact that Imp is fucking psychotic and won't compromise on anything or even deign to work against women holding positions of power. He just wants to detonate the entire human race and then gets confused about why everyone hates him. Then he rationalizes it to himself as getting botted.
I am working against women holding positions of power. I've been voting against female board members at every shareholder meeting I have the level of assets required to attend, but nobody's getting ousted. I don't have the numbers, I don't have the wealth to force it through.
For now, we're winning against the resolutions for gender "equity" audits, mainly because the board (and all the autopilot proxy votes) are against it, but I'm seeing more and more of that attempted. If one passes, the dam breaks.
Instead of caring about the shiny keys women and the WEF are waving in front of your faces with Mulvaney and the "women's sports" brigade maybe we should focus on the real problems. Instead of going on about Blackrock being "muh Jewish agenda", we should be focusing on the legal reasons why they should have no votes on shares held for somebody else. Can you imagine how absurd it would be in any other format? Imagine if your landlord could cast your vote in the elections for you! That's how you frame this shit to a fucking normal person. You don't go on about Jewish conspiracies and make the mere mention of the name induce eyerolls to everyone who doesn't have an Adolf Hitler painting in their living room.
Added to that, for those who do get a vote on the proposals, if you don't vote, the system votes for you, on the board's recommendations. That means yes to everyone on the board currently. That's how these people remain. Fix those two issues and you fix the system - nobody would dare rig a shareholder vote.
Why should I compromise with people who literally want to destroy my life and laugh about it? Why should I compromise with people who are shown clear paths to victory and ignore them? Neither women themselves nor their allies have any value as allies to anything good. We've seen that with how the right has gotten since they became a larger part of it.
Where was the push to take back the WI Supreme Court by leveraging the woman's DV conviction against her? No, instead we get women's shill crap. I'm sure that's just a coincidence and there aren't people making sure the right doesn't deviate from a pro-woman paths. The same day we lost Wisconsin for good, everyone was told to go after Bud Light. That'll help us reach 270! No, don't try to remove activist feminist judges who will entrench voter fraud, get mad at piss beer.
Everything you say, undermines your credibility and agency. Your framing is so extreme, that your actions are incongruent with your words.
There are logical conclusions to your thinking, all of which are quite grimdark and quite violent, but they are conclusions.
But you don't go there. So I'm left with only one of two conclusions:
A. You don't actually believe the things you say, you're just a troll trying to provoke others into reaching the mental conclusions you want them to, for your own amusement, or...
B. You know where your thinking leads, but you're just a coward.
Because if you do I can conceptualize that the world as you see it is a catch 22, it's all god's fault, and you are compelled to play by god's rules because the only thing YOU'RE judged for is your own actions.
But, if you do believe in god, and you believe everything you've said over the years, then I'm very curious why you haven't accepted Muhammed as the messenger of God's final revelation.
Now A, that's just being quippy without being constructive.
I think his train is "stuck" somewhere and I'm trying to unjam it.
My hope is that he says he's a believer, because if he is, there's essentially two paths to resolve his thinking. If he wants to be Christian, he needs to learn forgiveness. But if he can't forgive, then the path forward is to accept the next revelation, and it could be said that god is punishing him for not listening to the Prophet.
I am working against women holding positions of power. I've been voting against female board members at every shareholder meeting I have the level of assets required to attend, but nobody's getting ousted. I don't have the numbers, I don't have the wealth to force it through.
You're deranged. You don't look at substance, but only at gender. Which is why you supported Macron and the pro-choice candidate in the Philippines.
If a solid female GOP got the nomination, you'd be voting for Biden. That's how much of a lunatic you are.
Our disagreements run deeper than Jews vs. Women. He is market fundamentalist who would undermine nations and destroy social cohesion in the name of making line go up, just like our current ruling class does.
This is just a convoluted version of saying that you believe in the principles of Martin Luther King or in some other individualist bullshit which operates from the false presupposition of human equality, i.e. zhids and everything else under the 'human' umbrella are 'just like me'. Therefore, reject all 'identity politics' and come back to liberal pluralistic colourblind individualism. How about... bugger off?
Your first paragraph is typical 'cast the first stone' rubbish. 'We can't get rid of evil people because all people are to some degree evil.' Yeah, great. So no one can punish anyone because the judges and police also have their bad sides... 'The Nahtzees had no right to kill zhids because the Nahtzees weren't morally perfect either! Therefore, they were not in a position to cast the first stone'. What a compelling (not!) argument.
Finally, whatever the zhids are, they're a pox on this plane of existence and require nothing short of a Final Solution. Anyone who disagrees with this is simply an abject moron incapable of basic pattern recognition consequent of being unable to uncuck his stupid brain from individualist ideology. 'Anti-Semitic' 'identity politics' is a moral duty that will lead to a better world (not a 'utopia without evil' as those stupid idiots who constantly strawman 'anti-Semitism' like to claim), and is no way comparable to the spergery of scum like 'TheImpossible1'.
Nevertheless, it will get the world closer to it. The world would be a vastly better, cleaner, healthier, safer, saintlier place without filth like Harvey Weinstein, Seth Rogen, Sarah Silverman or all of those putrid scum running the Biden Administration, and, with an uncucked brain, it is abundantly clear that there is a common, all-too-visible thread between these obnoxious characters—something which individualist fools will never and can never see without stepping outside the confines of their limited worldview.
Stop complaining about illegal immigrants if you aren't willing to accept this simple fact about Mayorkas; stop complaining about American involvement in the Ukraine if you aren't willing to accept this indubitable truth about Blinken. Stop complaining about 'the economy' if you aren't willing to accept the truth about Yellen. Stop complaining about the CIA going after people when they're run by a 'David S. Cohen'. Stop complaining about the symptoms and start accepting the obvious pattern underlying them all, one as clear as day, or shut up. Hint: The pattern isn't women.
Post Removed: While I approve of the message, we have a standard policy where we don't want other users cited in the post title because it encourages flame wars. Feel free to re-post, but without naming specific users.
They have these beliefs mostly because they are extraordinarily stupid. But also an important factor is that they don't want to face the reality in which they live. Elites of all stripes are rotten to the core. If you imagine that if you get da Joooz or da whamen out, everything will be alright, it's more comforting than realizing that only a wholesale replacement of the elite class will do.
You sound like a decent fellow. But know that it's impossible to change the minds of these lunatics. Arguing with them is only worthwhile to show them as the lunatics that they are, and that only if it amuses you.
You're not being silenced. But you're playing the martyr because your claims are rather weak.
For one, what exactly were Jews financing in 1623 - or earlier, because you said "more than 400 years"?
The 1965 Hart-Cellar act was a Jewish policy Jews lobbied Congress to do for years.
Was it? And you think it passed because "Jews lobbied"? It's funny that when Jews hold a lot of positions of power, like in Hollywood, you blame the Jews, but when white men hold nearly all positions of power, you blame "Jews lobbying".
Jews fled to Hollywood because they didn't want to pay Edison labs the license fees for cameras and projection equipment.
What's so special about Hollywood that you don't have to pay license fees?
and Jews have run popular entertainment from the very beginning
So back when it wasn't a complete cesspool?
The same kind of people who get upset when a SJW says that "white men have run America from the beginning and are to blame for everything that goes wrong" make the exact same of argument based on far weaker evidence.
so basically, I know the weapon that's causing the damage but ignore the weapon itself and just accept that there is damage all over the place. got it.
I'm by no means all in on the jewish thing but there's no need to strawman them that hard.
They usually start with he plethora of books and statement where they explicitly state that white people are a problem to be eliminated or controlled. Then corollate that with the large number of jewish people in positions of power in institutions that just so happen to act against the interests of white men especially.
The explicit statements are by no means numerous enough to make a convincing case that all jews deserve scorn, but some of them are just as much demonstrably pieces of shit as the random black thugs filming themselves stomping asian grannies, and are generally better at leveraging their hatred too.
So, like women write against men and nobody bats an eyelid?
Your side is just a bizzaro version of mine, created out of some sort of necessity to poison the well.
Everybody acknowledges the feminist hate too dingus, you're just mad that no-one else will take that as cause to go all genocidey like you. Hence why even people with a more holistic approach are apparently on the "other side" of your single issue mindset.
At this point I'm fine with forcibly dismantling their all of their power and means. Sure it might disenfranchise a few innocent individuals, but it's a drop in the bucket compared to the number of people other individuals in that quadrant of the demographic venn diagram have used their power to torment, so to me it's a clear net gain. Desperate times call for desperate measures. Utopia has never been further from reach in our lifetimes, so I'm not stupid enough to cling to utopian ideals, I've made peace with the idea of creating a smaller injustice to correct a larger one. But it doesn't mean I'm ready to join you on all the way on your crusade for the final solution to the female problem.
You talked about the entertainment industry, and as proof you link to a video citing... some Jewish activists whose actions you don't like, having nothing at all to do with the entertainment industry.
Oops. But it's a good insight into the chaotic mind of a Stormfag, the Gleichschaltung of everything that is "JEW BAD".
Calm down, Cathy Newman, and try to actually read what people say, rather than making stuff up.
This may shock you, but I believe in linear time, so I don't think the current pathetic state caused things to happen in the past.
So no, you showing a video saying that Jews participated in the civil rights movement made no mention of entertainment and is therefore irrelevant to your claims.
No, I'm new here. What is this place even?
Oh, you saw no chance at all of salvaging your claims? How sad.
Start out so arrogant, and then fail so miserably.
Sorry, wasn't paying attention, the temperature in Tel Aviv is just too damn high!
OK, so you now realized that the video you posted was completely irrelevant, even though you tried to defend it at first, and now posted your second Google result?
How does this establish a Jewish conspiracy?
Companies are going woke because of ESG and banker investors. . ESG is caused by blackrock which were founded by jews.
You're attempting rational argument with these people. It's not possible, because whatever reason they offer is not the actual reason they hate the Jews. They also cannot be argued out of it.
Easy solution? Work to reduce the influence of both groups and it doesn't matter who is more correct, things will improve.
If imp and the stormies could agree that dismantling the power base of millionaire jewish women C-suites fits within both their agendas, I figure that'd be more productive than constantly bitching at each other and there's enough of those alone to keep both sides busy for the next few years.
Focus on the tasks you have in common and pool your efforts.
This would work, except for the fact that Imp is fucking psychotic and won't compromise on anything or even deign to work against women holding positions of power. He just wants to detonate the entire human race and then gets confused about why everyone hates him. Then he rationalizes it to himself as getting botted.
I am working against women holding positions of power. I've been voting against female board members at every shareholder meeting I have the level of assets required to attend, but nobody's getting ousted. I don't have the numbers, I don't have the wealth to force it through.
For now, we're winning against the resolutions for gender "equity" audits, mainly because the board (and all the autopilot proxy votes) are against it, but I'm seeing more and more of that attempted. If one passes, the dam breaks.
Instead of caring about the shiny keys women and the WEF are waving in front of your faces with Mulvaney and the "women's sports" brigade maybe we should focus on the real problems. Instead of going on about Blackrock being "muh Jewish agenda", we should be focusing on the legal reasons why they should have no votes on shares held for somebody else. Can you imagine how absurd it would be in any other format? Imagine if your landlord could cast your vote in the elections for you! That's how you frame this shit to a fucking normal person. You don't go on about Jewish conspiracies and make the mere mention of the name induce eyerolls to everyone who doesn't have an Adolf Hitler painting in their living room.
Added to that, for those who do get a vote on the proposals, if you don't vote, the system votes for you, on the board's recommendations. That means yes to everyone on the board currently. That's how these people remain. Fix those two issues and you fix the system - nobody would dare rig a shareholder vote.
Why should I compromise with people who literally want to destroy my life and laugh about it? Why should I compromise with people who are shown clear paths to victory and ignore them? Neither women themselves nor their allies have any value as allies to anything good. We've seen that with how the right has gotten since they became a larger part of it.
Where was the push to take back the WI Supreme Court by leveraging the woman's DV conviction against her? No, instead we get women's shill crap. I'm sure that's just a coincidence and there aren't people making sure the right doesn't deviate from a pro-woman paths. The same day we lost Wisconsin for good, everyone was told to go after Bud Light. That'll help us reach 270! No, don't try to remove activist feminist judges who will entrench voter fraud, get mad at piss beer.
Here's the thing TI...
Everything you say, undermines your credibility and agency. Your framing is so extreme, that your actions are incongruent with your words.
There are logical conclusions to your thinking, all of which are quite grimdark and quite violent, but they are conclusions.
But you don't go there. So I'm left with only one of two conclusions:
A. You don't actually believe the things you say, you're just a troll trying to provoke others into reaching the mental conclusions you want them to, for your own amusement, or...
B. You know where your thinking leads, but you're just a coward.
I don't want to be as bad as my enemy.
Okay, I need a clear answer to one question:
Do you, or do you not, believe in god?
Because if you do I can conceptualize that the world as you see it is a catch 22, it's all god's fault, and you are compelled to play by god's rules because the only thing YOU'RE judged for is your own actions.
But, if you do believe in god, and you believe everything you've said over the years, then I'm very curious why you haven't accepted Muhammed as the messenger of God's final revelation.
You are worse than any enemy you have.
Now A, that's just being quippy without being constructive.
I think his train is "stuck" somewhere and I'm trying to unjam it.
My hope is that he says he's a believer, because if he is, there's essentially two paths to resolve his thinking. If he wants to be Christian, he needs to learn forgiveness. But if he can't forgive, then the path forward is to accept the next revelation, and it could be said that god is punishing him for not listening to the Prophet.
Good luck, many have tried.
You're deranged. You don't look at substance, but only at gender. Which is why you supported Macron and the pro-choice candidate in the Philippines.
If a solid female GOP got the nomination, you'd be voting for Biden. That's how much of a lunatic you are.
Our disagreements run deeper than Jews vs. Women. He is market fundamentalist who would undermine nations and destroy social cohesion in the name of making line go up, just like our current ruling class does.
Market fundamentalism is the only economic theory proven to work in practice.
Destroying nations and social cohesion isn't "working."
People acting despite the market is what's destroying nations. ESG would fail in a free market.
ESG is a minor problem compared to mass immigration and outsourcing.
This is just a convoluted version of saying that you believe in the principles of Martin Luther King or in some other individualist bullshit which operates from the false presupposition of human equality, i.e. zhids and everything else under the 'human' umbrella are 'just like me'. Therefore, reject all 'identity politics' and come back to liberal pluralistic colourblind individualism. How about... bugger off?
Your first paragraph is typical 'cast the first stone' rubbish. 'We can't get rid of evil people because all people are to some degree evil.' Yeah, great. So no one can punish anyone because the judges and police also have their bad sides... 'The Nahtzees had no right to kill zhids because the Nahtzees weren't morally perfect either! Therefore, they were not in a position to cast the first stone'. What a compelling (not!) argument.
Finally, whatever the zhids are, they're a pox on this plane of existence and require nothing short of a Final Solution. Anyone who disagrees with this is simply an abject moron incapable of basic pattern recognition consequent of being unable to uncuck his stupid brain from individualist ideology. 'Anti-Semitic' 'identity politics' is a moral duty that will lead to a better world (not a 'utopia without evil' as those stupid idiots who constantly strawman 'anti-Semitism' like to claim), and is no way comparable to the spergery of scum like 'TheImpossible1'.
Nevertheless, it will get the world closer to it. The world would be a vastly better, cleaner, healthier, safer, saintlier place without filth like Harvey Weinstein, Seth Rogen, Sarah Silverman or all of those putrid scum running the Biden Administration, and, with an uncucked brain, it is abundantly clear that there is a common, all-too-visible thread between these obnoxious characters—something which individualist fools will never and can never see without stepping outside the confines of their limited worldview.
Stop complaining about illegal immigrants if you aren't willing to accept this simple fact about Mayorkas; stop complaining about American involvement in the Ukraine if you aren't willing to accept this indubitable truth about Blinken. Stop complaining about 'the economy' if you aren't willing to accept the truth about Yellen. Stop complaining about the CIA going after people when they're run by a 'David S. Cohen'. Stop complaining about the symptoms and start accepting the obvious pattern underlying them all, one as clear as day, or shut up. Hint: The pattern isn't women.
Muh both sides, muh clean your room
get lost.
https://postimg.cc/wy7R6HvM
Post Reported for: Rule 3 - Harassment
Post Removed: While I approve of the message, we have a standard policy where we don't want other users cited in the post title because it encourages flame wars. Feel free to re-post, but without naming specific users.
Sure, what are you hoping to see at Definitely Not E3™ next month?
They have these beliefs mostly because they are extraordinarily stupid. But also an important factor is that they don't want to face the reality in which they live. Elites of all stripes are rotten to the core. If you imagine that if you get da Joooz or da whamen out, everything will be alright, it's more comforting than realizing that only a wholesale replacement of the elite class will do.
You sound like a decent fellow. But know that it's impossible to change the minds of these lunatics. Arguing with them is only worthwhile to show them as the lunatics that they are, and that only if it amuses you.
You're not being silenced. But you're playing the martyr because your claims are rather weak.
For one, what exactly were Jews financing in 1623 - or earlier, because you said "more than 400 years"?
Was it? And you think it passed because "Jews lobbied"? It's funny that when Jews hold a lot of positions of power, like in Hollywood, you blame the Jews, but when white men hold nearly all positions of power, you blame "Jews lobbying".
What's so special about Hollywood that you don't have to pay license fees?
So back when it wasn't a complete cesspool?
The same kind of people who get upset when a SJW says that "white men have run America from the beginning and are to blame for everything that goes wrong" make the exact same of argument based on far weaker evidence.