Elon Musk announces female CEO of Twitter is coming. Didn't I call this right back at the beginning?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (43)
sorted by:
What are you so butthurt about? You can say stuff like this all day on Twitter. It's the white identity critics of Jewish power who have been banned.
You can't even link to website like TRS and the NJP on Twitter. Musk is defending Jews while allowing attacks on women, especially white women. It's pretty obvious the system is running an incel/anti-white women psyop on the right to detract from race and Jews, and Musk's Twitter is a big part of it.
What if I told you the problem was both women and jews?
What does this mean? Most of what people complain about women doing is intertwined with liberal ideology, and the people doing the complaining avoid acknowledging that (because they are usually liberals).
Do you think "liberal" ideology as you put it is new?
Did the Roman Empire not have transsexuals or gays? Did the Republic not have a "democracy"? Were there not immigrants? Was there not a constitution that suggested the people deserved liberty?
What I'm saying is that the problems with women in modernity have always been the same problems with women. The only reason they are more pronounced is because of jewish weakening of the patriarchy which kept women in line. It is female nature that is the problem with women not any ideology. If you don't believe me I can find references by ancient greeks over 2000 years old depicting women as liberal communists despite communism never existing. That's because it's in their nature. The jews helped to structure society in a manner that empowers women and oppresses men but even if you eliminate jews from your society you must still structure society to switch the relationship such that men "oppress" women in order to solve the problem of women. You cannot run an "equal" society without Jews and solve the problem of women. Women are not inherently good yet corrupted by jews. Women are inherently evil and jews simply empowered women to be themselves without male dominion to keep women inline.
You don't have to go back to the Roman Empire. We didn't have those things mere decades ago. However, that's because nominally liberal societies weren't living up to their values - and were better for it.
Racism was nearly as popular as breathing oxygen in 1950s America despite America's liberal foundations. Liberal societies have long had legions of illiberal people with all manner of illiberal beliefs within them. It's when liberalism pushed past and overran the illiberal values that things went to shit.
What does this mean to you? People around here abuse the shit out of ideological labels.
Who said anything about an "equal" society? That's a liberal belief.
I notice there is this thread in "wamen question" thought (as if it's worthy of being called "thought") that it is only now in modern times that people show their true selves. Of all the retarded things you guys spout, this is one of the worst. Why on earth do you think people are showing their "true" selves now, of all times?
People are more detached from reality than ever before. We spend more time staring at screens, immersed in virtual worlds, etc. than ever. In-person socialization has collapsed. People have fewer friends, less contact with their families, fewer marriages, etc. than previous generations. It's no wonder that modern gender ideology proliferates now. Yet, you guys say this is when the "true" women shows herself. It doesn't make any sense.
ETA: I meant to include in this bottom part that we are also immersed in a soup of propaganda like never before as well. People's views and opinions are manufactured by mass-produced propaganda like never before.
Because women have gained financial independence from men for resources, along with many things such as equal rights under the law. This allows women to act how they want to act rather than act the way men want them to act. Women don't need to earn men's favor and this is the result you get. That is a major change in modernity with the promotion of technology. Historically, women simply couldn't gain much financial independence even if they wanted to due to the burden of pregnancy/children and the physical labor required to extract resources that women were objectively worse at than men.
Have they really? Is this natural?
Women aren't financially independent. They are in more debt than men are.
How is it that women "act" ?
What does "this" mean? You are talking as if I already agree with you on all sorts of things so you can get away with using this vague language.
There is nothing natural about there being huge swathes of childless women. This is an abnormality unprecedented in history. You are almost making my point for me.
You cannot be this stupid. I'll give you bullet points to help.
They don't have to worry about finding a man to pay their bills, even if they'd like one.
Adding to that, their control of education has allowed them to create a permanent underclass with low self-worth.
Their entire past personality was to hook a simp to provide for them for life. Now they can churn through 3-5 in a lifetime, if not more.
I find it funny how stormfags don't get this. You're the originators of "hide your power level" memes and you can't understand other people do the same on different topics?
Way to address nothing I said (full disclosure: my edit was after this retard's reply)
Why do you think women working is bringing out their "true" selves? Who the hell thinks like this? Most people arrange their lives around their jobs. In other words, their job and all of its constraints shapes them. It doesn't liberate them.
That's not actually happening. Marriage rates are low, and romance is dead.
I can't believe you don't understand this. Women are not dependent on men for a place to live, etc. So they can be honest about how they feel about us and stop the obvious act.
Most of the marriages happening are of people who were already married once. It's women doing their own version of pump and dumping. Siphon and sprinting.
Let's just ignore that far-right ideology borderline deifies women.
How do you hit literally the opposite of reality?
How do you manage to be willfully blind to Jewish domination?
Because the people who tell me it exists are the same people who literally are women.
I'm not joking, some TD stormfag doxxed herself and she's a mid-20s woman. I was talking about it on my community, but I don't want to share it outside there where people could pick it up, mainly because despite my distaste for her, I don't think doxxing is ever right.
I just had to keep a record of it because people still tell me the idea that women are shilling stormfaggotry is tinfoil.
And that's after one stormfag woman outed herself as fucking 16 year olds, and another posted something that glows harder than Chernobyl.
Maybe I should start calling them stormcunts, based on what's been revealed so far.
Let me get this straight...
Your reasoning is that it can't be true because there are women who believe it....?
When your female radiologist tells you that you have a tumor, are you going to disbelieve her, or will you be accusing her of putting it there? should we discard this whole 'radiation comes from inside the atom?' Nonsense as female supremacist science, ascribing a 'birthing' nature to a rounded, feminine form orbitted by electron 'beta males'?
The 'antisemitic trope' is older than European civilization, and it bubbles up time and time again, century after century, for millenia, anywhere one finds a Jewish population that, again and again, through usury and insularity, gets rich and ends up owning everything despite doing no work,.. this is the brainchild of women? Some female scheme through the ages? ...To what end?
It doesn't matter where the Jews go. Every population they ever interacted with after the fall of Jerusalem ended up accusing them of the same subvert-and-financially-control-our-hosts scheme.
Tell me, who was the shadow female puppet master that made Edward Longshanks remove the Jews from Britain? Was Mohammed's wife whispering in his ear? Did Hitler meet a girl in Vienna, and just didn't tell us about her?
Seriously, I wanna know.
No, that's absurd. My reasoning is that, judging by revealed identities so far, the entire stormfag movement, at least here, is a group of white women circlejerking about how important they are and lying about not being women.
Who knows, maybe ArchRespawn is a woman.
I wouldn't trust a female doctor, no. Also, wouldn't they be more likely to lie that you aren't sick, considering that'd do more damage?
I wonder who that describes. Did you know who owns more homes than all investment funds combined? Single women, particularly the divorced. Because they stole them.
I can't take anyone seriously who thinks charging interest on loans is a great sin. It's required to prevent capital raising becoming a popularity contest.
It just comes off as bitterness about their lack of capital.
And then when they die, a bank will take them.
There really is no getting your mind off anything other than women.
And? They'll be dead. What consequence does that have?
It'll be sold on the market and a woman will either be the new owner or steal it from the new owner.
That's your choice. I think people should be free to choose a doctor in non-emergencies that they trust.
Wasn't the last CEO his dog?
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-calls-dog-twitter-ceo-dresses-it-elizabeth-holmes-2023-4
God I hope this is just a troll, but it's too official sounding to be one, in my opinion. Especially as Tesla just jumped before the end of trading on the news.
It'd bring him more SEC trouble if he was kidding.
Tesla still is.
But him stepping down as CEO of another company affects Tesla.
Yeah, you totally called it.
You spam dozens of posts every day blaming women for everything and saying they're controlling the whole world, and you might get something right once every other week.
You ain't got shit on broken clocks.
But yeah, you totally called it.
What if the real troll is that he has hired a full on male that simply chooses to identify as a woman? That will be pretty stellar.
That would be awesome but I doubt it. He still wants advertisers on the platform
Well, it was (kinda) nice while it lasted, from what I heard.
In before it's that whore from Tesla executive that he had twins with.
Jokes aside, this proves that my predictions should be respected more. I said he would hand them the keys to the castle. I said not to trust him.
The CEO of SpaceX is a woman so this is not exactly a significant prediction.
No wonder their rockets keep exploding.
Kek.
I always thought he was the CEO of SpaceX.
Another red flag everyone missed.