How many flame throwers do we need?
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
Not a fan of gendering the transformers in any way. It implies they have deployable robo cocks.
The Michael Bay movies did feature a transformer’s testicles.
I.... oh.
That can't be true.
My mistake. It was "scrotum". At 1:10 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLliGoWI1o4
The scrotum joke is the least-bad part of this entire clip. The effects, the dialog, the pacing, it's fucking terrible. If you put a laugh track over this, I would believe that it was from a saturday night live skit.
They're generally designed as androids/gynoids in their robot forms, so it's inevitable simply as a matter of convenience.
I disagree. Transformers' sexual dimorphism doesn't make sense in-universe, but in the absence of primary sexual characteristics I'd still be fine with referring to sexless non-humans as "he" or "she" and not "they" or "it" - even for someone like a Bolo, who is just a sapient ultraheavy tank and has no secondary sexual characteristics either.
I wonder if transformers rule 34 is a thing.
"Dragons fucking cars" is a thing. Transformers are much more humanoid and normal compared to that. Of course it's a thing.
Sisters, stop downvoting literally anything Imp says, come on.