PornHub traffic in Louisiana drops 80% after digital ID requirement
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (94)
sorted by:
Hurting the big sites like pornhub is a huge victory in and of itself. They've allowed videos on human trafficking and minors. The victims have tried to get the videos taken down and pornhub denied their requests.
Thinking you were going to do away with all the of porn on the internet or stopping everyone from watching porn, and considering anything less a failure, is ridiculous.
Anyone who's against porn understands that this is a victory.
It's hollow because it's a conclusion not a cause of our problems. People wouldn't need porn as much if the entire dating scene wasn't a minefield being patrolled by wolves.
As for trafficking and minors, I ain't defending that shit considering VPNs would hand over ip data if authorities had evidence of those kinds of crimes and needed the information. That just sounds like another company turning a blind eye to shit they should be monitoring like Twitter pre Elon.
That's a bigger risk with all IRL porn and only way to counter that is to go full digital or drawn only.
You're not wrong, but expecting to fix that problem in one generation is unreasonable. Most of those people are broken and can't be fixed. Your best bet is to raise future generations properly and that's a tough task as it is if people aren't willing to homeschool their children.
I will say this: the sexual revolution is what led to a lot of those problems and porn was a key driver, and still is till this day.
Expecting to fix that problem by banning porn is unreasonable. Most of the internet is porn. The only way to achieve the boomercon goal here is totalitarian control over internet activity that would make every leftist cum like gangbusters.
Here you conflate causes with consequences. If the internet had been invented a hundred years ago, or a thousand, it would still be mostly porn. This is human nature.
Your issues are not the same issues that the law intends to fix.
"Porn" back then was women showing their ankles and even people back then found that reprehensible.
Either way, this whole conversation is steering off-topic.
You don't like the law? Okay, fine, don't care.
You don't need porn as a substitute for not getting laid. That shit, if anything, is fucking up your ability to do so. Take up a hobby. Treat porn like the bad habit it is and break it.
And don't masturbate, either. You'll go blind and develop hairy palms!
Also ignore the biological reality that human males are so primed to release sperm that, if you abstain from sex and masturbation entirely, you'll STILL cream your pants, just in your sleep.
Biological realities are hate facts!
Hey! Some people have the ability to not release it in their sleep!
...They usually develop pancreatic cancer.
So cream your pants. Or if you're so inclined, masturbate once a month. This isn't a life or death situation. You will lose more years off your lifespan from having poor exercise and dietary habits than from not being able to coom everyday.
Kek.
Strong drink is a mocker, and should be outlawed. Guns kill people, and should be banned. Same thinking. Doesn't work.
Pornographers would be put to death in a healthy society.
Mild nudity in classic sculptures and paintings was done in a classy way and should have been the Overton window extreme.
The only people defending porn are addicted to it and trying to justify that addiction. Pornography is as immoral as sodomy.
People have no idea how far they have strayed in the West away from God in their pursuits of nothing but their own carnal pleasures, to the point chastity isn't even a part of the modern man's vocabulary.
How many lives has your marriage cult ruined now? How many women gained wealth they never deserved? How much money did the church make from our slavery?
I'm not addicted, I don't even use it. I just know that marriage shilling tradfaggots don't care about the lives they ruin.
Because the "victims" are lying. Exodus Cry belong in hell next to MasterCard.
And the guy suing Twitter because under Jack they refused to remove CSEM he was in that was uploaded against his will? Tech companies don't remove profitable content. And pedos love social media. Not everyone is a liar.