The interviewer Linsey Davis asked RFK Jr. about his belief that vaccination was linked to autism, which he began to explain before she jumped in and claimed that has all been debunked. The footage then skipped to a different topic entirely.
After the interview concluded, Davis told viewers “We should note that during our conversation, Kennedy made false claims about the Covid-19 vaccines.”
She claimed “Data shows that the Covid-19 vaccine has prevented millions of hospitalizations and deaths from the disease.”
“He also made misleading claims about the relationship between vaccination and autism,” Davis further asserted, adding “Research shows that vaccines and the ingredients used in the vaccines do not cause autism, including multiple studies involving more than a million children and major medical associations like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the advocacy group Autism Speaks.”
“We’ve used our editorial judgment in not including extended portions of that exchange in our interview,” Davis explained.
I don't know about vaccines, but it definitely seems like vaccine mandates and isolation orders did. I also wouldn't consider the experimental injections to be vaccines.
The covid vaccine just caused blood clots, heart attacks, and of course "suddenly" the new number one cause of death among otherwise healthy celebrities who got the shot.
So what caused the big spike in autism that seemed to coincide with the number of vaccines on the child immunization schedule?
I'm not saying they definitely cause autism. But before Covid, I guess I just didn't believe that the entire medical community (95% anyway) could or would cover something like that up. But now I know that isn't the case. They could and would do that.
'The guy who did the study' is, presumably, Andrew Wakefield, and he didn't 'make it all up'. He suggested in a research paper that some research be done investigating the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.
He then went on to produce two documentaries (Vaxxed I&II, available on Bitchute) that will probably confirm your suspicion that vaccines can cause autism. The data is anecdotal -- because scientists refuse to do official studies -- but it's much more convincing that you think. I'm talking perfectly healthy children getting the shots and within 24 hours they end up with dead eyes, and are non-functional for the rest of their lives.
"laurithorne's" suggestion is typical of someone that hasn't looked into the issue. Yes, diagnosis of autism has exploded, so some of the correlation with vaccines is expected and harmless, but the extremely violent reactions are... stunning.
Your own source admits that Wakefield hasn't denounced his work, so no, he hasn't 'admitted that he made it all up'.
I then pointed out that he was involved in two documentaries that present striking, if somewhat biased, anecdotal evidence. You can draw your own conclusions if you deign to watch them.
I fail to see how (a)being right and (b) being reasonable makes me a moron.
Why do interviews with these peoples' hardware? YOU tape the session, and give them a copy, for which they should PAY you; post the original, unedited, on Rumble.
Why does mainstream media even exist any more? What purpose does it serve beyond control? (it's hardly making its owners rich) Why does a candidate need to go on a TV interview show instead of just putting a video up online?
Of course my pleas can only be heard and acted on by those who benefit from media control and those under control, so I'm just yelling into the wind.
I believe that's called 'election interference'.
I used to scoff at the claim that vaccines cause autism.
Now I think it's more likely to be true than false.
I don't know about vaccines, but it definitely seems like vaccine mandates and isolation orders did. I also wouldn't consider the experimental injections to be vaccines.
I agree that Covid vaccines aren't vaccines. I'm referring to the "traditional" vaccines.
They don't cause autism.
The covid vaccine just caused blood clots, heart attacks, and of course "suddenly" the new number one cause of death among otherwise healthy celebrities who got the shot.
So what caused the big spike in autism that seemed to coincide with the number of vaccines on the child immunization schedule?
I'm not saying they definitely cause autism. But before Covid, I guess I just didn't believe that the entire medical community (95% anyway) could or would cover something like that up. But now I know that isn't the case. They could and would do that.
A broadening of the term "autism" and the fact that severe cases of autism where you can't function is no longer a death sentence.
Vaccines don't cause autism, and the guy who did the study admitted he made it all up. Pick a different track.
Link?
'The guy who did the study' is, presumably, Andrew Wakefield, and he didn't 'make it all up'. He suggested in a research paper that some research be done investigating the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.
He then went on to produce two documentaries (Vaxxed I&II, available on Bitchute) that will probably confirm your suspicion that vaccines can cause autism. The data is anecdotal -- because scientists refuse to do official studies -- but it's much more convincing that you think. I'm talking perfectly healthy children getting the shots and within 24 hours they end up with dead eyes, and are non-functional for the rest of their lives.
"laurithorne's" suggestion is typical of someone that hasn't looked into the issue. Yes, diagnosis of autism has exploded, so some of the correlation with vaccines is expected and harmless, but the extremely violent reactions are... stunning.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831678/
You and Wakefield are both full of shit
Don't listen to the moron below. It's all bullshit.
https://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c7452
Your own source admits that Wakefield hasn't denounced his work, so no, he hasn't 'admitted that he made it all up'.
I then pointed out that he was involved in two documentaries that present striking, if somewhat biased, anecdotal evidence. You can draw your own conclusions if you deign to watch them.
I fail to see how (a)being right and (b) being reasonable makes me a moron.
My own conclusion is that self reported anecdotal evidence is the realm of moronic sociologists who whine about how oppressed they all are.
That same level of "EvIDenCe" should be dismissed regardless of how "StRiKiNG" you find it.
It's not "ReAsonAblE" to buy made up bullshit, thats what anecdotes with no evidence of a causal relationship actually are by the way.
Why do interviews with these peoples' hardware? YOU tape the session, and give them a copy, for which they should PAY you; post the original, unedited, on Rumble.
Why does mainstream media even exist any more? What purpose does it serve beyond control? (it's hardly making its owners rich) Why does a candidate need to go on a TV interview show instead of just putting a video up online?
Of course my pleas can only be heard and acted on by those who benefit from media control and those under control, so I'm just yelling into the wind.
call him a liar.
He made more political hay by appearing on "This Past Weekend."
This is not surprising.
What is surprising is the fact that he feels the need to appear on corporate news shows that nobody watches anymore.