'The guy who did the study' is, presumably, Andrew Wakefield, and he didn't 'make it all up'. He suggested in a research paper that some research be done investigating the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.
He then went on to produce two documentaries (Vaxxed I&II, available on Bitchute) that will probably confirm your suspicion that vaccines can cause autism. The data is anecdotal -- because scientists refuse to do official studies -- but it's much more convincing that you think. I'm talking perfectly healthy children getting the shots and within 24 hours they end up with dead eyes, and are non-functional for the rest of their lives.
"laurithorne's" suggestion is typical of someone that hasn't looked into the issue. Yes, diagnosis of autism has exploded, so some of the correlation with vaccines is expected and harmless, but the extremely violent reactions are... stunning.
Your own source admits that Wakefield hasn't denounced his work, so no, he hasn't 'admitted that he made it all up'.
I then pointed out that he was involved in two documentaries that present striking, if somewhat biased, anecdotal evidence. You can draw your own conclusions if you deign to watch them.
I fail to see how (a)being right and (b) being reasonable makes me a moron.
A broadening of the term "autism" and the fact that severe cases of autism where you can't function is no longer a death sentence.
Vaccines don't cause autism, and the guy who did the study admitted he made it all up. Pick a different track.
Link?
'The guy who did the study' is, presumably, Andrew Wakefield, and he didn't 'make it all up'. He suggested in a research paper that some research be done investigating the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.
He then went on to produce two documentaries (Vaxxed I&II, available on Bitchute) that will probably confirm your suspicion that vaccines can cause autism. The data is anecdotal -- because scientists refuse to do official studies -- but it's much more convincing that you think. I'm talking perfectly healthy children getting the shots and within 24 hours they end up with dead eyes, and are non-functional for the rest of their lives.
"laurithorne's" suggestion is typical of someone that hasn't looked into the issue. Yes, diagnosis of autism has exploded, so some of the correlation with vaccines is expected and harmless, but the extremely violent reactions are... stunning.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831678/
You and Wakefield are both full of shit
Don't listen to the moron below. It's all bullshit.
https://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c7452
Your own source admits that Wakefield hasn't denounced his work, so no, he hasn't 'admitted that he made it all up'.
I then pointed out that he was involved in two documentaries that present striking, if somewhat biased, anecdotal evidence. You can draw your own conclusions if you deign to watch them.
I fail to see how (a)being right and (b) being reasonable makes me a moron.
My own conclusion is that self reported anecdotal evidence is the realm of moronic sociologists who whine about how oppressed they all are.
That same level of "EvIDenCe" should be dismissed regardless of how "StRiKiNG" you find it.
It's not "ReAsonAblE" to buy made up bullshit, thats what anecdotes with no evidence of a causal relationship actually are by the way.