Alex Bruesewitz was photoshopping images of Stormy Daniels and labeling it Jenna Ellis. Jenna Ellis sent him a legal notice and he changed it to Jebba Ellis.
Brendan Dilley and his obnoxiously retarded army of Trump "memers" were also making sexual photoshopped pictures of her with DeSantis.
I don't like Jenna Ellis and I think she is a shit tier lawyer that Trump should never have hired but she was actually being harassed by some of the dumbest grifters working for Trump 2024.
That last sentence reminded me of The Daily Show’s parody civics textbook where one of the classroom activities was to cut out pictures of Supreme Court robes and “restore the dignity of the court” by taping them over naked pictures of the nine justices. I laughed for about five minutes straight when I got to that page.
Then later they put out a “teacher’s edition” that had corrections written into the original text by a professor (i.e. telling how stuff really works when the original contained a joke) but on the naked justices page he just wrote “look… just because you CAN do something doesn’t mean you SHOULD.” I about died a second time.
Only in America can a woman see criticism of their shared public opinion as harassment.
That's adorable.
What does this refer to? Read the comment thread but still don't know.
Alex Bruesewitz was photoshopping images of Stormy Daniels and labeling it Jenna Ellis. Jenna Ellis sent him a legal notice and he changed it to Jebba Ellis.
Brendan Dilley and his obnoxiously retarded army of Trump "memers" were also making sexual photoshopped pictures of her with DeSantis.
I don't like Jenna Ellis and I think she is a shit tier lawyer that Trump should never have hired but she was actually being harassed by some of the dumbest grifters working for Trump 2024.
That last sentence reminded me of The Daily Show’s parody civics textbook where one of the classroom activities was to cut out pictures of Supreme Court robes and “restore the dignity of the court” by taping them over naked pictures of the nine justices. I laughed for about five minutes straight when I got to that page.
Then later they put out a “teacher’s edition” that had corrections written into the original text by a professor (i.e. telling how stuff really works when the original contained a joke) but on the naked justices page he just wrote “look… just because you CAN do something doesn’t mean you SHOULD.” I about died a second time.
I doubt she had a legal leg to stand on. Lawyers know as much as anyone about sending bullshit letters.
Why is this all happening?