The British media is slowly catching up to things I've already discovered.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
You highlighted the part where the GBI attacks the family structure, which you also hate. So I guess you guys are on the same team.
People can be right for the wrong reasons.
The traditional family structure is outdated, not because it stops boys from wanting to be girls, but that it's built on the assumption that having someone at home while you're at work is at all necessary. If I have to fight women's sick system to get a job, I'm not splitting the money with one.
Regardless, I said that this insidious anti-male agenda had to be monitored and I said several state actors are involved.
Maybe the media will catch up to what I've been saying eventually. Probably not. It hits far too many "sacred" figures.
When did babies evolve the ability to feed themselves?
You cannot be serious.
Your argument for giving women free rent, free utilities, free essentials for living and some level of contributions towards their hobbies and interests for life is that someone needs to hold a bottle to the baby's mouth?
Like that contribution is at all equal?!
Besides, give it 10-15 years and there'll be AI nannies for those rich enough to afford them. Will be much better than the outdated and overpriced equipment we have today.
...Yeah. Feeding babies is indeed a contribution, assuming of course they don't grow up to be like you.
Imagine thinking your own mother feeding you was contributing nothing. I guess you were finally right about something.
It's the contribution. You know, continuation of a species and all that. Providing and caring for your offspring is literally the most important contribution to your species 99.9% of people can possibly make.