Good, try to do that as it might finally get the supreme Court to outline the restrictions of the presidency and embolden local level and state level officials to realise 'hey wait, he can't actually enforce this WITHOUT our help, he really is just a puppet!'
Forbes notes the executive order “also directs the attorney general to develop a plan to prevent firearms dealers whose federal licenses have been revoked from continuing to sell guns.”
I'm sorry, you haven't been doing that? You have one job, enforce the fuckin law.
If you morons can't even stop people you know are selling guns commercially with a revoked license why should I think you'd be able to tackle the black market?
Fuckin clown world out here boys.
Just get rid of the FFL system, you mooks apparently aren't running it in the first place.
The only government agency that is proactive in going after people who "forget" to do things is the IRS. Because money is important to them, the laws are just games they play with the masses.
Its the same with the huge chunk of illegals who just "forget" they are overstaying their visas. They never go anywhere unless they get attention on them, and then proceed to take up a huge chunk of our tech industry.
That's actually incorrect. You can only make so many sales before you are required to get an FFL, if you lose your FFL and sell guns at the same rate, you're violating the law.
A person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms, but such a term shall not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all a part of his personal collection of firearms.
It just doesn't give a number because of course it doesn't, but someone who already had an FFL and continues to sell guns at the volume they did under their FFL would clearly be in violation of this law. They claim this isn't regulating guns, just interstate commerce.
It's not anywhere near that vague. It's vague, but nobody can justify reading "for purposes of adding to a collection" as "nobody needs more than one gun" or "for profit and livelihood" as "you made a $30 profit" to any judge.
Yes, it's a bullshit law, no it's not as bad as you claim.
Good, try to do that as it might finally get the supreme Court to outline the restrictions of the presidency and embolden local level and state level officials to realise 'hey wait, he can't actually enforce this WITHOUT our help, he really is just a puppet!'
I'm sorry, you haven't been doing that? You have one job, enforce the fuckin law.
If you morons can't even stop people you know are selling guns commercially with a revoked license why should I think you'd be able to tackle the black market?
Fuckin clown world out here boys.
Just get rid of the FFL system, you mooks apparently aren't running it in the first place.
The only government agency that is proactive in going after people who "forget" to do things is the IRS. Because money is important to them, the laws are just games they play with the masses.
Its the same with the huge chunk of illegals who just "forget" they are overstaying their visas. They never go anywhere unless they get attention on them, and then proceed to take up a huge chunk of our tech industry.
That's actually incorrect. You can only make so many sales before you are required to get an FFL, if you lose your FFL and sell guns at the same rate, you're violating the law.
the law is unconstitutional.
Sure, but it's the law and it hasn't been over turned because of muh commerce clause
There's a law that says.
It just doesn't give a number because of course it doesn't, but someone who already had an FFL and continues to sell guns at the volume they did under their FFL would clearly be in violation of this law. They claim this isn't regulating guns, just interstate commerce.
It's not anywhere near that vague. It's vague, but nobody can justify reading "for purposes of adding to a collection" as "nobody needs more than one gun" or "for profit and livelihood" as "you made a $30 profit" to any judge.
Yes, it's a bullshit law, no it's not as bad as you claim.
Oi, the daft old bastard is goin' t' do it, just in toime for St. Paddy's! I gotta call Seamus, we gotta go plow a field!
scotus just strike down all gun law that isn't 2a please.
Wormtongue definitely has him.