It's not anywhere near that vague. It's vague, but nobody can justify reading "for purposes of adding to a collection" as "nobody needs more than one gun" or "for profit and livelihood" as "you made a $30 profit" to any judge.
Yes, it's a bullshit law, no it's not as bad as you claim.
It's not anywhere near that vague. It's vague, but nobody can justify reading "for purposes of adding to a collection" as "nobody needs more than one gun" or "for profit and livelihood" as "you made a $30 profit" to any judge.
Yes, it's a bullshit law, no it's not as bad as you claim.