A person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms, but such a term shall not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all a part of his personal collection of firearms.
It just doesn't give a number because of course it doesn't, but someone who already had an FFL and continues to sell guns at the volume they did under their FFL would clearly be in violation of this law. They claim this isn't regulating guns, just interstate commerce.
It's not anywhere near that vague. It's vague, but nobody can justify reading "for purposes of adding to a collection" as "nobody needs more than one gun" or "for profit and livelihood" as "you made a $30 profit" to any judge.
Yes, it's a bullshit law, no it's not as bad as you claim.
There's a law that says.
It just doesn't give a number because of course it doesn't, but someone who already had an FFL and continues to sell guns at the volume they did under their FFL would clearly be in violation of this law. They claim this isn't regulating guns, just interstate commerce.
It's not anywhere near that vague. It's vague, but nobody can justify reading "for purposes of adding to a collection" as "nobody needs more than one gun" or "for profit and livelihood" as "you made a $30 profit" to any judge.
Yes, it's a bullshit law, no it's not as bad as you claim.