If you traveled anywhere in the South, you would drive many of these attempts at self-sustained micro-cities. They were called company towns. They ended up completely abandoned because the primary business goes under or got sold off to China. This will be no different.
The only successful revolution in history that actually led to an improvement for the common man was actually a war of secession, organized in pubs in small cities, and fought by rural farmers, seceding from an overbearing globalist empire with a massive and well-funded, but widely dispersed military.
For starters, it sounds like he's talking about creating new cities, not enslaving existing ones. Also, if done well, could be pretty great. If he can actually deliver on giving more access to buying a house, that would be pretty great...if it doesn't ruin wherever they end up being. Also reinvigorating American industry which, when you think about it, is about the opposite of what the WEF wants.
You'll own homes, produce goods, and be happy.
Again, I'm just saying from his pitch; not even endorsing it or anything, just saying it sounds very different - at least to me - than the globalist shit. Doesn't mean it couldn't also be a disaster, but it would be a different disaster.
Except for the tyrants like both Roosevelts, Wilson, and the last 4 bar Trump, and the ones who got functionally assassinated like Harding and Nixon, everyone since 1860.
VTOL vehicles for families... The high rate of auto accidents during rush hour does not inspire confidence in the average citizen piloting airborne vehicles in an urban setting.
If you traveled anywhere in the South, you would drive many of these attempts at self-sustained micro-cities. They were called company towns. They ended up completely abandoned because the primary business goes under or got sold off to China. This will be no different.
Why the hell is he proposing the same idea as the WEF?
It's not that bad of an idea, it's just that they are evil.
It's absolutely a terrible idea.
Cities are a defunct technology. They drive people crazy, and the only benefit, easy coordination, has been superceded by communications technology.
The only successful revolution in history that actually led to an improvement for the common man was actually a war of secession, organized in pubs in small cities, and fought by rural farmers, seceding from an overbearing globalist empire with a massive and well-funded, but widely dispersed military.
You're hating on Trump again, color me shocked.
I'm very dubious of Trump, but what he's saying and what the WEF saying are totally different.
I'd love to see the differences. I don't mean that sarcastically, I want to actually see them and discuss them.
For starters, it sounds like he's talking about creating new cities, not enslaving existing ones. Also, if done well, could be pretty great. If he can actually deliver on giving more access to buying a house, that would be pretty great...if it doesn't ruin wherever they end up being. Also reinvigorating American industry which, when you think about it, is about the opposite of what the WEF wants.
You'll own homes, produce goods, and be happy.
Again, I'm just saying from his pitch; not even endorsing it or anything, just saying it sounds very different - at least to me - than the globalist shit. Doesn't mean it couldn't also be a disaster, but it would be a different disaster.
I'd happily take a different disaster.
Name a new city Gotham and put it in Jersey.
That's just called Camden.
First of all Urban voters vote at least 75-25 in favor of Democrats.
It would be suicide for Republicans to create completely new cities in red states. It would attract urbanites who are predominantly Democrats.
If you want to turn current red states like Montana, Idaho and Kansas completely blue, this retarded plan is how you would do it.
We need to reinvigorate rural communities and create growth in rural areas not build new urban areas.
Republicans will never win urban voters so why the hell would you create new urban areas in your own states?
This is a disastrous policy and I still would hate it if anyone else suggested it.
If DeSantis comes out with a plan like this, I would be the first guy ripping into him.
What if the office of US President is fake and has been owned by WEF/Globalists/Big <Something>/The World's Top Banking Families for decades?
Since at least 1900, maybe longer.
Except for the tyrants like both Roosevelts, Wilson, and the last 4 bar Trump, and the ones who got functionally assassinated like Harding and Nixon, everyone since 1860.
VTOL vehicles for families... The high rate of auto accidents during rush hour does not inspire confidence in the average citizen piloting airborne vehicles in an urban setting.
The average citizen shouldn't be piloting them.
Okay. How?
Urban voters vote at least 75-25 in favor of Democrats.
It would be suicide for Republicans to create completely new cities in red states. It would attract urbanites who are predominantly Democrats.
If you want to turn current red states like Montana, Idaho and Kansas completely blue, this retarded plan is how you would do it.
We need to reinvigorate rural communities and create growth in rural areas not build new urban areas.
I'm still more concerned about the bailouts for women.