Universal suffrage is shit because as soon as you get honest elections the political organizations discover that the best way to manufacture votes is to import voters.
Immigration becomes first and foremost about importing the correct voting demographic to ensure the "correct" outcome of elections.
Importing them or buying them. Women vote overwhelmingly leftist because their mentality gravitates toward replacing the role of a husband with the state. Weak men vote to be mastered, they will vote themselves into chains of slavery for free shit, like what welfare has done to the black communities.
I'm not in favor of barring anyone from voting on identity grounds however (collectivism is cancer), but the natural consequence of a starship troopers system would see the kind of people with weak will excluded from the process.
The average chucklefuck has no idea about anything. Welfare leeches being able to vote for gimmes, cowards and communists viting for self-destructive things that violate the constitution, all of these are problems.
Low information voters are a fucking plague - we will never have legitimacy as long as some wealthy fuck can simply go on television and lie to people, and they eat it up with goldfish tier memory
The vote should be earned through personal sacrifice, heinlein style. The only country to successfully practice something resembling a democratic process and retain liberty was the united states, and we were NEVER meant to have universal suffrage - there were strict qualifications for the right to vote, originally.
They were imperfect restrictions, but the founders knew how moronic of an idea universal suffrage and direct democracy was.
The average chucklefuck has no idea about anything.
The 'average chucklefuck' at least knows the difference between a man and a woman, which cannot be said of the rich scumbags you want to have control over the polity.
The vote should be earned through personal sacrifice, heinlein style. The only country to successfully practice something resembling a democratic process and retain liberty was the united states, and we were NEVER meant to have universal suffrage - there were strict qualifications for the right to vote, originally.
No, that is retarded. It would mean that Bezos and Zuckerberg have a vote, and a coal miner doesn't.
They were imperfect restrictions, but the founders knew how moronic of an idea universal suffrage and direct democracy was.
The funny thing is that you think that universal suffrage actually makes a difference. It doesn't. The elites have control regardless.
I said personal sacrifice, Heinlein style. This translates to dangerous civil service, not wealth. That is explicitly the kind of thing that people like bezos and the other self obsessed types avoid at all costs. It can't be bought, it can't be passed down and it REQUIRES a risk of death.
I have heard of it, but Switzerland is sui generis, unfortunately. And even Switzerland has the problem of globalists breathing down its neck. While not a formal EU member, it has to abide by a lot of crap from the EU.
It's not possible to be a healthy fish in heavily polluted water, unfortunately.
But I do agree that Switzerland is way better than any other Western country.
At this point if the reform party fails, then it's time to look into organizing mass emigration to abandon the nation, or getting arms into the country to fix it.
If you need to import arms you've already lost. The moment the tea binging subjects let their masters take their guns was the moment they surrendered totally.
The british nationals have over time been stripped of the will to liberty. Over hundreds of years of colonial efforts and emigration, nearly every line of people with the mental fortitude to handle being a citizen instead of a subject has left, to the US or other colonies, or been killed in war.
The genetic and cultural remnants of the british nation are no longer capable of freeing themselves.
Beyond the fact that the Ukraine Russia conflict was avoidable, why do you have a bigger problem with Ukrainian refugees than the islamic state of londonistan? You want to talk immigration problems in england, the ukes are the least of their problems.
The british government has sabotaged brexit at every possible opportunity, because the peasants weren't actually supposed to vote for it.
Britcucks have zero say in their government.
Like the rest of the world.
Direct democracy is shit. Universal suffrage is a mistake. Giving every retard a vote is a quick path to destruction in most places.
Universal suffrage is shit because as soon as you get honest elections the political organizations discover that the best way to manufacture votes is to import voters.
Immigration becomes first and foremost about importing the correct voting demographic to ensure the "correct" outcome of elections.
Importing them or buying them. Women vote overwhelmingly leftist because their mentality gravitates toward replacing the role of a husband with the state. Weak men vote to be mastered, they will vote themselves into chains of slavery for free shit, like what welfare has done to the black communities.
I'm not in favor of barring anyone from voting on identity grounds however (collectivism is cancer), but the natural consequence of a starship troopers system would see the kind of people with weak will excluded from the process.
Problems exist not because ordinary people vote, but because their votes count for nothing and MNOs, NGOs, and Bezos/Zuckerberg decide what happens.
But then again, never underestimate the ability of right-wingers to get in their own way.
The average chucklefuck has no idea about anything. Welfare leeches being able to vote for gimmes, cowards and communists viting for self-destructive things that violate the constitution, all of these are problems.
Low information voters are a fucking plague - we will never have legitimacy as long as some wealthy fuck can simply go on television and lie to people, and they eat it up with goldfish tier memory
The vote should be earned through personal sacrifice, heinlein style. The only country to successfully practice something resembling a democratic process and retain liberty was the united states, and we were NEVER meant to have universal suffrage - there were strict qualifications for the right to vote, originally.
They were imperfect restrictions, but the founders knew how moronic of an idea universal suffrage and direct democracy was.
The 'average chucklefuck' at least knows the difference between a man and a woman, which cannot be said of the rich scumbags you want to have control over the polity.
No, that is retarded. It would mean that Bezos and Zuckerberg have a vote, and a coal miner doesn't.
The funny thing is that you think that universal suffrage actually makes a difference. It doesn't. The elites have control regardless.
I said personal sacrifice, Heinlein style. This translates to dangerous civil service, not wealth. That is explicitly the kind of thing that people like bezos and the other self obsessed types avoid at all costs. It can't be bought, it can't be passed down and it REQUIRES a risk of death.
Read starship troopers.
I have heard of it, but Switzerland is sui generis, unfortunately. And even Switzerland has the problem of globalists breathing down its neck. While not a formal EU member, it has to abide by a lot of crap from the EU.
It's not possible to be a healthy fish in heavily polluted water, unfortunately.
But I do agree that Switzerland is way better than any other Western country.
At this point if the reform party fails, then it's time to look into organizing mass emigration to abandon the nation, or getting arms into the country to fix it.
If you need to import arms you've already lost. The moment the tea binging subjects let their masters take their guns was the moment they surrendered totally.
The british nationals have over time been stripped of the will to liberty. Over hundreds of years of colonial efforts and emigration, nearly every line of people with the mental fortitude to handle being a citizen instead of a subject has left, to the US or other colonies, or been killed in war.
The genetic and cultural remnants of the british nation are no longer capable of freeing themselves.
Beyond the fact that the Ukraine Russia conflict was avoidable, why do you have a bigger problem with Ukrainian refugees than the islamic state of londonistan? You want to talk immigration problems in england, the ukes are the least of their problems.
That's what proves they're actually refugees.
lol, were you keeping track who was the first to cross the border?
Who deserved it btw.
The argument used against Syrians is that they were all men who flooded Europe instead of fighting against ISIS. And that was correct.
You did not show me how you discerned that this was the first Ukrainian to enter the UK.
The gods are just, and of our pleasant vices make instruments to plague us.
I viscerally hate the architects of these documents.