Biden and the jackass who told him not to shoot it down (probably CCP agent Milley or our diversity hire defense secretary) should be hung for treason for letting this farce go on for 3 fucking days.
It's wrong to say they should be hung. The proper phrasing is that they should be hanged.
I obviously agree, but good luck getting any court to actually try them.
Why? Treason is a federal crime for which one of the possible punishments is death, and could theoretically include willfully allowing a spy balloon to gather intelligence by flying over US territory. It's not a definite case of treason, and not all cases of treason result in the death penalty, but calling this a glowpost seems silly. A glowpost would be "we should go hang Biden and and the jackass who told him not to shoot it down for treason," as that would be advocating violence. This is advocating the application of law.
You really don't want to be giving the security state ammunition to go after you or the platform you're posting on. It's probably legal speech under SCOTUS precedent, but they've gone after platforms for much less than this.
The law does not allow for summary hangings. Whether intended or not, it can be read as advocating for mob justice, as it states the 'should' rather unconditionally.
Note where you Fall on the security/freedom scale, you act out of fear when ever a potential “current event” arises as temporarily problematic for your precious site
Don’t lie, I was banned for merely suggesting the fbi were similar to British redcoats in a meme. You act irrationally and fearfully whenever a potential issue arises.
It's wrong to say they should be hung. The proper phrasing is that they should be hanged.
I obviously agree, but good luck getting any court to actually try them.
You're correct, that's an error I make sometimes because I don't use the phrasing often. I usually say something like "deserves the rope".
This is a glowpost, and I suggest you remove it.
Why? Treason is a federal crime for which one of the possible punishments is death, and could theoretically include willfully allowing a spy balloon to gather intelligence by flying over US territory. It's not a definite case of treason, and not all cases of treason result in the death penalty, but calling this a glowpost seems silly. A glowpost would be "we should go hang Biden and and the jackass who told him not to shoot it down for treason," as that would be advocating violence. This is advocating the application of law.
You really don't want to be giving the security state ammunition to go after you or the platform you're posting on. It's probably legal speech under SCOTUS precedent, but they've gone after platforms for much less than this.
The law does not allow for summary hangings. Whether intended or not, it can be read as advocating for mob justice, as it states the 'should' rather unconditionally.
Note where you Fall on the security/freedom scale, you act out of fear when ever a potential “current event” arises as temporarily problematic for your precious site
Serious question; why are you such a bootlicker?
You're a glowpost.
Your mom is a glow post!
Milley committed treason. From his own damned mouth he committed treason
Would it still be a glowpost if I edited the part about giving them the rope? Suggesting that they're not traitors isn't really reasonable here.
I think it should be fine if 'hung' is just replaced with 'indicted' or something.
Don’t lie, I was banned for merely suggesting the fbi were similar to British redcoats in a meme. You act irrationally and fearfully whenever a potential issue arises.
People used to lynch commie scum like yourself.
Die mad.
I'm counting on it.